Another fight after a clean hit (Brad Stuart obliterates Pietrangelo)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Em etah Eh

Maroon PP
Jul 17, 2007
3,130
1,537
Yeah, was a perfectly clean hit. No need for a fight there and a dumb penalty. I do like the chipiness though. Perron got away with a dirty slash on zets so he better be ready for payback later on.
 

Crease

Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
Jul 12, 2004
24,396
26,622
He didnt have to fight any one, he choose to fight stewert. If he didnt want to fight he could have skated away when he saw stewert coming straight towards him. but he choose to drop his gloves

Stuart knows he has to answer the bell. The point is that he shouldn't have to.
 

cice963

Registered User
May 2, 2009
426
0
How can the tie-down rule apply when a player is forced to fight?

It does not apply
"A player who is involved in an altercation, when the opponent has been identified as an instigator, shall not be assessed a game misconduct penalty if his jersey should be removed by an opponent or an official in the discharge of his duties, regardless as to whether or not he was properly “tied-down†(jersey properly fastened to pants)."
 

The Red Line

Registered User
Oct 11, 2010
8,505
5,022
So Stuart doesn't get called on the tie-down? Stuart got straight dropped. Funny how he can only throw a punch when he is down on the ground while the ref's are trying to break it up.

Stay class brohan.

Wow.

Stay cluelessly biased.
 

Dynheart

Registered User
Aug 21, 2011
2,039
54
He didnt have to fight any one, he choose to fight stewert. If he didnt want to fight he could have skated away when he saw stewert coming straight towards him. but he choose to drop his gloves

The man didn't have a choice. Did you see Stewart? There was going to be a fight weather Stuart wanted to or not. So either he drops them and gives himself some type of chance, or just let Stewart pull his Jersey over his head and pummel him anyway.

The result would have been the same eithehr way because Stewart wanted a fight either way with, or without Stuarts permission.
 

monkeywrench

Registered User
May 11, 2010
977
22
Edmonton
They need to start handing out suspensions for idiots starting fights over clean hits.

You got to be kidding me? It makes people think before they throw a huge hit or even a dirty hit if they know they will have to fight, which prevents injuries
 

heygarebear

Blues
Feb 28, 2002
2,668
41
STL - Nashville
a lot of crying in this thread. who cares if stuart was challenged. he better have been. Petro is easily our best player. after seeing perron out of a season.. clean hit or not.. you have to send a message.
 

Mr Dangles

Made of 100% genuine star stuff.
Sep 23, 2008
2,012
0
Arizona
Really St. Louis? That was a perfectly clean hit. It makes you look like a child who didn't get their way.

Stewart, not the entire city/team is 'to blame.' It was a clean hit, but Stewart wanted to make a statement. It's just as childish to whine about Stewart looking for a fight.
 

Kaoz*

Guest
So much butthurt. Gotta send a message if you mess with star players.

Exactly. This has been happening since hockey became a professional sport so not sure why people are so surprised by it... has there been an influx of new fans?

Players fight after a clean hit because they want to attempt to deter those big hits in the future clean or not, or at least make the player hesitate before making it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad