Toggle sidebar

Player Discussion Andrew Peeke

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I love Peeke as posters here have disagreed with. I think he is right where his salary should be. But he doesn't have the physicality you would expect from a guy his size. He does his job with minimal mistakes. I would not be surprised to see him get better and extended. Just another awful opinion...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Hook and Alan Ryan
This is Brandon Carlo’s ice time over the last five games:
IMG_4689.jpeg


This is Andrew Peeke’s ice time over that same stretch:
IMG_4690.jpeg


I’m wondering how people feel about this and what we feel it could mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wintersej, BMC and Dr Hook
Mr. Make-Believe said:
This is Brandon Carlo’s ice time over the last five games:
View attachment 967633

This is Andrew Peeke’s ice time over that same stretch:
View attachment 967634

I’m wondering how people feel about this and what we feel it could mean.
Click to expand...
i'm not a huge carlo fan, but he's certainly helpful and good at what he does. with that being said, this team
is desperate to find goals and he has value to help get that guy. if they do deal carlo, they'd need to find another
RD because the organization is pretty thin there...and it's nice to see peeke doing well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tbaybruin, CDJ, BMC and 3 others
neelynugs said:
i'm not a huge carlo fan, but he's certainly helpful and good at what he does. with that being said, this team
is desperate to find goals and he has value to help get that guy. if they do deal carlo, they'd need to find another
RD because the organization is pretty thin there...and it's nice to see peeke doing well.
Click to expand...
Carlo is pedestrian without Hampus. Bring him back and Carlo becomes better than average IMO. Peeke is feeling it now and probably a better play in crunch time than Carlo right now.

Mad-Marcus said:
I love Peeke as posters here have disagreed with. I think he is right where his salary should be. But he doesn't have the physicality you would expect from a guy his size. He does his job with minimal mistakes. I would not be surprised to see him get better and extended. Just another awful opinion...lol
Click to expand...
Yeah I was one that questioned the move. I still think they could have gone about it differently but it's working out ok. Keep grooming he and Lohrei together
 
  • Like
Reactions: neelynugs and Mad-Marcus
neelynugs said:
i'm not a huge carlo fan, but he's certainly helpful and good at what he does. with that being said, this team
is desperate to find goals and he has value to help get that guy. if they do deal carlo, they'd need to find another
RD because the organization is pretty thin there...and it's nice to see peeke doing well.
Click to expand...
Loved the Peeke move from day one. DS get shit on a bunch and rightfully so but he did well on this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tbaybruin and Mr. Make-Believe
neelynugs said:
i'm not a huge carlo fan, but he's certainly helpful and good at what he does. with that being said, this team
is desperate to find goals and he has value to help get that guy. if they do deal carlo, they'd need to find another
RD because the organization is pretty thin there...and it's nice to see peeke doing well.
Click to expand...
Rd is thin in the whole league
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tbaybruin
Mr. Make-Believe said:
This is Brandon Carlo’s ice time over the last five games:
View attachment 967633

This is Andrew Peeke’s ice time over that same stretch:
View attachment 967634

I’m wondering how people feel about this and what we feel it could mean.
Click to expand...
It means to me, and really, sample size could be bigger, that Carlo is expendable and should be used to address a need through a trade. I don’t dislike Carlo at all, but if Peeke can fill his minutes, it should be on the table.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4ORRBRUIN, BruinDust, Greek_physique and 2 others
neelynugs said:
i'm not a huge carlo fan, but he's certainly helpful and good at what he does. with that being said, this team
is desperate to find goals and he has value to help get that guy. if they do deal carlo, they'd need to find another
RD because the organization is pretty thin there...and it's nice to see peeke doing well.
Click to expand...
If Will Borgen can get you Kaapo Kakko, there's a deal out there for Carlo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: quietbruinfan, BruinDust, 4ORRBRUIN and 2 others
dafoomie said:
If Will Borgen can get you Kaapo Kakko, there's a deal out there for Carlo.
Click to expand...
As a Carlo backer, I have always considered him taking more crap from fans then he should have, many fans just throw shit out there, oh he is soft, oh no offense, just ripping the guy and have no clue what they are talking about, and generally do not understand what his job is. I admit this has not been Carlos best year, and I have always been against trading him, but I would now listen to offers, if it would help this team. I must ask though, how do you replace, his contract, his age, and his talent as a shutdown d-man, and realize he is a quality d-man, trust me, it will not be easy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDiesel
Mr. Make-Believe said:
This is Brandon Carlo’s ice time over the last five games:
View attachment 967633

This is Andrew Peeke’s ice time over that same stretch:
View attachment 967634

I’m wondering how people feel about this and what we feel it could mean.
Click to expand...

I think it means, over the last 5 games, Peeke has been on the ice more often when the Bruins get hemmed into their own zone. Had that 3:50 shift a couple games ago. That's not by design.

That said, Peeke has done a good job in a very difficult situation with McAvoy out and no other RD to replace Charlie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pearljamvs5 and DKH
Mr. Make-Believe said:
This is Brandon Carlo’s ice time over the last five games:
View attachment 967633

This is Andrew Peeke’s ice time over that same stretch:
View attachment 967634

I’m wondering how people feel about this and what we feel it could mean.
Click to expand...
It means Peeke has moved past Carlo as the #2RD.

It means Carlo is expendable for the right return (which I think we all knew).

Carlo hasn't had a great year, with no consistent puck moving partner and taking that dirty hit against Dallas, he's been up and down. He's probably feeling the heat from fans and media too (who want the Bruins to be better and blame him and others in the core for the down season). Despite that, I still think he can be (and occasionally is) one of the best defensive D in the league. I can't think of many D that get buried with defensive assignments like he does. I think a re-set would do wonders for him mentally. I think teams would line up for his services and I would hope to get a return fitting a player with his history and experience.

How do the Bruins replace what he brings? Maybe they don't. Maybe it's time to build a more modern D, with guys who play a bit more two-way.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Raleighfern, neelynugs, CDJ and 2 others
  • Like
Reactions: CDJ
Hookslide said:
As a Carlo backer, I have always considered him taking more crap from fans then he should have, many fans just throw shit out there, oh he is soft, oh no offense, just ripping the guy and have no clue what they are talking about, and generally do not understand what his job is. I admit this has not been Carlos best year, and I have always been against trading him, but I would now listen to offers, if it would help this team. I must ask though, how do you replace, his contract, his age, and his talent as a shutdown d-man, and realize he is a quality d-man, trust me, it will not be easy.
Click to expand...
Carlo plays all the hard minutes and he has to be valued properly, but if the thesis around here is that they need to either carry the puck faster, move the puck faster, add more skill, etc, shouldn't you look at moving the guy who plays a ton of minutes who doesn't give you that? It would suck to lose him, but if it brings back a legit top 6, maybe even top line forward you do it.

They created that possibility when they got Peeke. With McAvoy, Lindholm, Zadorov, and Peeke in your top 4 and Lohrei on the bottom pair they can fill that hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tbaybruin, NDiesel, Dr Hook and 1 other person
dafoomie said:
Carlo plays all the hard minutes and he has to be valued properly, but if the thesis around here is that they need to either carry the puck faster, move the puck faster, add more skill, etc, shouldn't you look at moving the guy who plays a ton of minutes who doesn't give you that? It would suck to lose him, but if it brings back a legit top 6, maybe even top line forward you do it.

They created that possibility when they got Peeke. With McAvoy, Lindholm, Zadorov, and Peeke in your top 4 and Lohrei on the bottom pair they can fill that hole.
Click to expand...

I would not move Carlo till the off-season, if moving him is on the table. I like what Peeke is bringing right now, but I would also like to see him sustain the performance through the end of the season before making that call. Either that or he needs to be out in a hockey trade where a RD comes back that has a different skill set.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom