Confirmed with Link: [ANA/STL] Cam Fowler and 2027 4th round pick for 2027 2nd round and Jeremie Biakabutuka

TheDarkWingThatDucks

Registered User
Oct 30, 2024
71
81
Not trolling, where was he open about wanting a trade? All I’ve seen is him being open to one, after Verbeek brought it up, and it seems like it was made clear he wasn’t wanted.

All I’ve seen were insiders saying they’d heard he wanted to play for a contender, I never heard a word about him wanting out from anyone Ducks or Ducks adjacent.

I think the issue with Verbeek is that he is always the one throwing in the sweetener, whilst never receiving one.
He got the sweetener when he tried for Dadanov ……. 🥺
 

LuGBuG

Quack Quack
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2006
4,923
3,608
Ducks
Fowler isn't a victim here. His play was uninspired, he was open about wanting a trade. Verbeek has made moves that are open to criticism, but this isn't one of them.
I don’t think it was a bad move at all and agree Fowler isn’t a victim. I just can understand everything surrounding what was happening impacting his play negatively. He’s been here his entire career, knew he was on his way out and there is a lot of hockey stress and real life stress that comes along with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rybread86

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,544
2,421
Not trolling, where was he open about wanting a trade? All I’ve seen is him being open to one, after Verbeek brought it up, and it seems like it was made clear he wasn’t wanted.

All I’ve seen were insiders saying they’d heard he wanted to play for a contender, I never heard a word about him wanting out from anyone Ducks or Ducks adjacent.

I think the issue with Verbeek is that he is always the one throwing in the sweetener, whilst never receiving one.
Verbeek is busy right now. Dealing with these outright lies from keith handle. Poor guy, can’t catch a break
 

Deuce22

Registered User
Jun 17, 2013
6,078
8,677
SoCal & Idaho
Not trolling, where was he open about wanting a trade? All I’ve seen is him being open to one, after Verbeek brought it up, and it seems like it was made clear he wasn’t wanted.

All I’ve seen were insiders saying they’d heard he wanted to play for a contender, I never heard a word about him wanting out from anyone Ducks or Ducks adjacent.

I think the issue with Verbeek is that he is always the one throwing in the sweetener, whilst never receiving one.
Wanting to play for a contender equals open to a trade for me. Ducks aren't contending anytime soon. I agree with your last paragraph, but sometimes you just have to take your medicine to do what needs to be done.
 

Lord Flashheart

Squadron Commander
Jul 21, 2011
9,275
2,118
Leipzig/Zg
Trouba is a few years younger than cam, a former captain, Big and right handed. All of that said… Trouba >>> Fowler moving forward
Let's not pretend like Trouba is some huge upgrade. He's already made quite a few mistakes, he's frequently behind the play, and his mobility is not good, all of these are bound to get even more exaggarated as he gets older. On the other hand he does bring some physicality and muscles in the crease. Interestingly enough, "everyones" new favorite descriptor of hockey games, Stat cards, had him, from memory, mostly in the negative in the games he played ao far.

As Verbeek said in the intermission of last game, trading Fowler will give younger guys opportunity to grow, meaning that, among other things, it will force the coach to play younger guys more.
 

Deuce22

Registered User
Jun 17, 2013
6,078
8,677
SoCal & Idaho
Let's not pretend like Trouba is some huge upgrade. He's already made quite a few mistakes, he's frequently behind the play, and his mobility is not good, all of these are bound to get even more exaggarated as he gets older. On the other hand he does bring some physicality and muscles in the crease. Interestingly enough, "everyones" new favorite descriptor of hockey games, Stat cards, had him, from memory, mostly in the negative in the games he played ao far.

As Verbeek said in the intermission of last game, trading Fowler will give younger guys opportunity to grow, meaning that, among other things, it will force the coach to play younger guys more.
Fowler, as an offensively focused LHD, was redundant with our young LHD. Trouba is a better fit with those guys and balances out the pairings. If he was good, Rangers wouldn't have be desperate to dump him. Hopefully, he's a short term fix until Luneau is ready and Moore (fingers crossed) gets signed.
 

Ducks DVM

sowcufucakky
Jun 6, 2010
54,755
34,111
Long Beach, CA
Wanting to play for a contender equals open to a trade for me. Ducks aren't contending anytime soon. I agree with your last paragraph, but sometimes you just have to take your medicine to do what needs to be done.
Open to a trade yes. That’s much different than asking for a trade though.

I feel like he’s the new kid being taken advantage of because he either plays too much hardball and loses out or doesn’t play enough hardball and gets taken advantage of.
 

Ducks DVM

sowcufucakky
Jun 6, 2010
54,755
34,111
Long Beach, CA
Fowler, as an offensively focused LHD, was redundant with our young LHD. Trouba is a better fit with those guys and balances out the pairings. If he was good, Rangers wouldn't have be desperate to dump him. Hopefully, he's a short term fix until Luneau is ready and Moore (fingers crossed) gets signed.
I think Moore is why Dumoulin and Gudas won’t be extended. He won’t sign if he’s blocked long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 70sSanO
Oct 18, 2011
44,301
10,244
The bigger issue here for me is someone who has been here 14 years, never caused a problem, never complained about things even when bad wanted out so badly he'd go to another mediocre team


Something is not right here with how the organization is being run. Ownership needs to be paying more attention
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boo Boo

duckpuck

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2007
2,610
2,745
Fowler, as an offensively focused LHD, was redundant with our young LHD. Trouba is a better fit with those guys and balances out the pairings. If he was good, Rangers wouldn't have be desperate to dump him. Hopefully, he's a short term fix until Luneau is ready and Moore (fingers crossed) gets signed.

This is exactly the point. Trouba better fits the ducks current needs.

And to that point, many here have (in my view correctly) criticized Cam's soft play. But what really bothers me is that in his entire time on the ducks, I never saw him stand up for a teammate. I don't mean fighting. I mean when there were scrums, I can't recall a single time where he was in the middle of it or actively mixing it up. I think that is why he was never captain and never could be.

The bigger issue here for me is someone who has been here 14 years, never caused a problem, never complained about things even when bad wanted out so badly he'd go to another mediocre team


Something is not right here with how the organization is being run. Ownership needs to be paying more attention

Why can't it just be about the player? He didn't fit in the ducks plans, was blocking younger guys, was seemingly in decline (or at least not playing well), and Fowler himself wanted to move on.

He was going to see reduced ice time and potentially be scratched. To me, finding a place for a guy in that situation and accepting a lesser return is actually the right thing to do for both the player and the organization. Moving on was best for all.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad