GDT: Amerks @ Sens 7 PM ET - TV: Sabres.com, ESPN+? Radio: WGR550

jc17

Registered User
Jun 14, 2013
11,390
8,202
Four guys on AHL deals on the ice (and one WHL guy as the backup). 88 total NHL games in the lineup. And they worked.

If this is something Leone can keep up, I'm looking forward to the AHL season. Now how do I sell enough blood to buy the AHL pass through Flohockey? I'm not sure, though it's more that they don't accept it when you bring it in in buckets.
How much do you think was coaching/camp and how much do you think the result tonight was a testament to the drafting/development up to this point?
 

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
24,853
31,310
Starting to see why Ostlund/Kulich are here, and Savoie is not.
I would love to know when they decided he was the one out. It could honestly be he was the one Edmonton wanted most because…hometown kid, highest draft pedigree…and Adams was targeting a player who wasn’t traditionally “available” and had to give to get.

But I’ve wondered if Savoie was going to be in the plans since Benson fell. I’ve believed Kulich surpassed him since his 18 year old season in Roch. I’ve believed they preferred Ostlund since he was the best player at a WJC that Savoie struggled in. But…when Helenius was drafted I thought that could mean more for Ostlund’s future than Savoie since I never thought Savoie would play center at that level. We saw days later that it didn’t. Could have been any of those steps or none of them…and it kills me that we will never know because it is interesting as hell.

But I never worried about the cost of that deal. Because I still had Helenius, Ostlund, Kulich and Benson. And Rosen and Wahlberg if you want them. Just…there’s still too many guys…You know?

But I think Savoie will be a good player…probably better than some of those and not as good as others…but I’ve never minded that he was the one to go first and I was ecstatic when he was there at their pick. When Benson fell the next year it changed a bit for me though.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
155,888
110,011
Tarnation
How much do you think was coaching/camp and how much do you think the result tonight was a testament to the drafting/development up to this point?

The bulk of the Rochester returnees have worked together enough for there to be some chemistry there going into these games. They have an idea who they are playing with and what is expected other than Helenius IMO. And he's a mid-first rounder who just played a season against men in Finland. The PP did things that it did when it worked last year even if the trigger man in Kulich wasn't there - there is continuity and I would put that on the staff.

That said, there is also a f*** ton of talent there. Three first round picks dressed for them tonight (Ostlund, Rosen, Helenius) as well as a recent high second (Wahlberg). Add in some nice mid-to-late round pro Russian finds in Neuchev, Komarov, and Novikov and there is clear talent in who tgivehey've drafted. They could've had another recent first rounder in the lineup if Johnson dressed. They have a solid batch of talent, but the augmentation with some quality AHL-level depth guys who play their role is something to look at Karmanos' body of work and give him a tip of the cap IMO.

Some of it is talent. Some of it is coaching. I don't think it's clearly leaning one way or the other.
 

Bobby Bottle Service

Win for Rick
Dec 15, 2005
5,363
3,519
Toronto
I would love to know when they decided he was the one out. It could honestly be he was the one Edmonton wanted most because…hometown kid, highest draft pedigree…and Adams was targeting a player who wasn’t traditionally “available” and had to give to get.

But I’ve wondered if Savoie was going to be in the plans since Benson fell. I’ve believed Kulich surpassed him since his 18 year old season in Roch. I’ve believed they preferred Ostlund since he was the best player at a WJC that Savoie struggled in. But…when Helenius was drafted I thought that could mean more for Ostlund’s future than Savoie since I never thought Savoie would play center at that level. We saw days later that it didn’t. Could have been any of those steps or none of them…and it kills me that we will never know because it is interesting as hell.

But I never worried about the cost of that deal. Because I still had Helenius, Ostlund, Kulich and Benson. And Rosen and Wahlberg if you want them. Just…there’s still too many guys…You know?

But I think Savoie will be a good player…probably better than some of those and not as good as others…but I’ve never minded that he was the one to go first and I was ecstatic when he was there at their pick. When Benson fell the next year it changed a bit for me though.
Kulich and Benson drove Matt down the depth chart, and Konsta sealed the deal.

I imagine if EDM wanted Ostlund he would have been available. I'm happy with how it's panning out so far.
 

Matt Ress

Don't sleep on me
Aug 5, 2014
5,616
3,286
Appalachia
Thought Ostlund is a little thicker than last year. Giving the puck up on the first GA was pretty bad but he definitely made up for it with that slice
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chainshot

ValJamesDuex

Registered User
Nov 4, 2021
10,718
6,071
Screen Shot 2024-09-26 at 9.36.31 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL

Dubi Doo

Registered User
Aug 27, 2008
20,280
14,178
Good to hear they're coming out aggressive and seem to be well conditioned in these few preseason games. Far cry from last year. Hopefully, that means they won't fall on their face for the first third of the season. I have hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeDislikeEich

Gabrielor

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
14,058
15,057
Buffalo, NY
I would love to know when they decided he was the one out. It could honestly be he was the one Edmonton wanted most because…hometown kid, highest draft pedigree…and Adams was targeting a player who wasn’t traditionally “available” and had to give to get.

But I’ve wondered if Savoie was going to be in the plans since Benson fell. I’ve believed Kulich surpassed him since his 18 year old season in Roch. I’ve believed they preferred Ostlund since he was the best player at a WJC that Savoie struggled in. But…when Helenius was drafted I thought that could mean more for Ostlund’s future than Savoie since I never thought Savoie would play center at that level. We saw days later that it didn’t. Could have been any of those steps or none of them…and it kills me that we will never know because it is interesting as hell.

But I never worried about the cost of that deal. Because I still had Helenius, Ostlund, Kulich and Benson. And Rosen and Wahlberg if you want them. Just…there’s still too many guys…You know?

But I think Savoie will be a good player…probably better than some of those and not as good as others…but I’ve never minded that he was the one to go first and I was ecstatic when he was there at their pick. When Benson fell the next year it changed a bit for me though.
Benson is without a doubt the best of them, for sure.

My immediate reaction was sad to be losing Savoie, since I still think he has a top 6 ceiling, but within minutes I was much happier to have McLeod and actually push the NHL team forward (and I have a friend who loves Tullio).

Wahlberg seems like the guy every other team is trying to snatch from us in a trade, and I see why. He's unique in our pool. Rosen is still a wildcard on NHL future for me, but he's a jack-of-all-trades with speed at this point, so there must be a spot for him. Helenius I feel has a low ceiling and is near guaranteed to hit it. Ostlund's even more wildcardy. Don't have a beat on what his NHL role is, yet.

Our prospect pool, sans a top-top tier franchise guy, is as balanced as it's ever been. You name it, we have it.

I just need the guys already in Buffalo to move this thing forward, so the reinforcements actually matter, and we aren't rebuilding a team with them in 3-4 years.
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,154
2,008
The bulk of the Rochester returnees have worked together enough for there to be some chemistry there going into these games. They have an idea who they are playing with and what is expected other than Helenius IMO. And he's a mid-first rounder who just played a season against men in Finland. The PP did things that it did when it worked last year even if the trigger man in Kulich wasn't there - there is continuity and I would put that on the staff.

That said, there is also a f*** ton of talent there. Three first round picks dressed for them tonight (Ostlund, Rosen, Helenius) as well as a recent high second (Wahlberg). Add in some nice mid-to-late round pro Russian finds in Neuchev, Komarov, and Novikov and there is clear talent in who tgivehey've drafted. They could've had another recent first rounder in the lineup if Johnson dressed. They have a solid batch of talent, but the augmentation with some quality AHL-level depth guys who play their role is something to look at Karmanos' body of work and give him a tip of the cap IMO.

Some of it is talent. Some of it is coaching. I don't think it's clearly leaning one way or the other.
Komarov looks bigger than 6'3" 198. What a score that would be if he could play NHL minutes
 

Tatanka

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2016
4,707
3,184
Benson is without a doubt the best of them, for sure.

My immediate reaction was sad to be losing Savoie, since I still think he has a top 6 ceiling, but within minutes I was much happier to have McLeod and actually push the NHL team forward (and I have a friend who loves Tullio).

Wahlberg seems like the guy every other team is trying to snatch from us in a trade, and I see why. He's unique in our pool. Rosen is still a wildcard on NHL future for me, but he's a jack-of-all-trades with speed at this point, so there must be a spot for him. Helenius I feel has a low ceiling and is near guaranteed to hit it. Ostlund's even more wildcardy. Don't have a beat on what his NHL role is, yet.

Our prospect pool, sans a top-top tier franchise guy, is as balanced as it's ever been. You name it, we have it.

I just need the guys already in Buffalo to move this thing forward, so the reinforcements actually matter, and we aren't rebuilding a team with them in 3-4 years.
I have noticed more high IQ plays in three pre-season games from 18 yo Helenius than I have in 2.5 years of Krebs. I see a much higher ceiling for Konsta. Middle 6 C with defensive chops. His battle on the blue line last night during a forecheck was top notch. I think he and Ostlund are in the plans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778

old kummelweck

Registered User
Nov 10, 2003
25,766
5,856
I have noticed more high IQ plays in three pre-season games from 18 yo Helenius than I have in 2.5 years of Krebs. I see a much higher ceiling for Konsta. Middle 6 C with defensive chops. His battle on the blue line last night during a forecheck was top notch. I think he and Ostlund are in the plans.
Krebs for me is the tail of poor prospect development.
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,154
2,008
Sabres roster lists him at 6'4" and 208.

Jerry Forton described him as "almost 6-foot-4" back in May.
Makes more sense. Prospects sites have him way lower. He looked like a bruiser. If he can skate with any decency and keep the offence up he could be a real menace somewhere in the lineup in the future. Obviously, means nothing now. Solid AHL year would be impressive.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad