I think I made my position pretty clear if you cared to read all of my posts on the topic, and I feel the concerns are well justified. If you can't take the time to read the posts, here are the cliff notes -
This organization continues to draw from the same well for their coaches, and their coaches continue to have the same shortcomings. People are pleased with the development job Appert did because the prospects are putting up points in the minors, but if you delve into the situation there, it becomes apparent that the players are playing the same shinny hockey that Granato was running in Buffalo - puck chase and ignore all passing lanes and discipline and just outwork your opponents. No discipline. No details. No on ice communication. No Teamwork. Just go play harder as individuals.
I devoted a huge chunk of my life to playing and coaching hockey and I have some pretty strong opinions on how the game should be coached and played. These are my opinions and I am entitled to them. If you read all of my posts you would see that I am willing to give the guy a chance, but I was voicing my concerns, as I believe the coaches that the USNT churns out are very homogenous in their style and philosophy, and that style lacks the details that all the current players seem to be lacking, so bringing in more of the same when it is failing the organization seems a bit insane to me.