how is vegas or Toronto going to Give him a Q offer of 10mil? from his stand point he has all the cards.
It’s been reported that Toronto wouldn’t be opposed to viewing him as a rental…but at the same time, from a Shark’s standpoint, why would they be looking at a team looking to give up a rental price for Meier over a team looking at him long term. If Toronto somehow offers the best package over both NJD and CAR for only a guaranteed rental, then that seems like poor asset management on Toronto’s part.
And Vegas seems to have nothing of value to really win out a bidding war against other teams here.
The assumption is that an extension adds meaningful value. The evidence is mixed. Faulk, Pageau and Lindholm didn’t get much more than expected, for example.
The absence of a new contract may simply subtract some trade partners.
If the Canes are giving up Jarvis and a 1st, there's basically no chance they give up Morrow as well. The 3rd round pick is whatever but 1st, Jarvis and Morrow... lol, good luck getting anywhere near that value given Meier's RFA status.1st, 3rd, Jarvis, Morrow for an extended Meier
Lets get this over with!
Really? Buffalo fans I saw were very lukewarm on it saying they wont move any of their young guys or firstsBuffalo fans do not agree with this report.
Some fans are delusional and/or aren't paying attention to the GM.Really? Buffalo fans I saw were very lukewarm on it saying they wont move any of their young guys or firsts
True, but how can the Leafs afford his $10M QO next year so that he isn't a rental? Four $10M + players seems like a stretch to me, but who knows.
Ohh no I’d give Sandin, Knies and 2 1sts for Meiers.That offer would be like 5th place on possible offers they will receive for Mieir.
Could trade for him and either flip him or someone else in the summer to recoup the assets.No one is going to pay the price for Meier and treat him as rental
Could always trade Matthews in the summer since he's gone after next season anywaysCould be that if they can agree to terms on a long term deal at 8 ish million they trade Nylander or another piece to make space? Could even flip Meier at the draft although I don't know how likely that would be given the acquisition cost
I like Kane as a UFA better. Keep all their assetsThe Sabres should be in on him.
They could decide to move Meier or Nylander in the summer depending on their extension demands.
If he's not a rental how they gonna fit him next year......The report was that the Leafs do not want to move their 1st or top prospects for a RENTAL.
Key word there, RENTAL. Meier is not a rental, hes an rfa after this year.
Meier should be the Devils to lose. They have the prospects and picks to make it work. It would be really foolish of them to not pull the trigger imo.
Holtz + 1st + whatever else you need to get it done.
It’s been reported that Toronto wouldn’t be opposed to viewing him as a rental…but at the same time, from a Shark’s standpoint, why would they be looking at a team looking to give up a rental price for Meier over a team looking at him long term? If Toronto somehow offers the best package over both NJD and CAR for only a guaranteed rental, then that seems like poor asset management on Toronto’s part.
And Vegas seems to have nothing of value to really win out a bidding war against other teams here.
Leafs would have to move Murray in a soft deal and trade brodie for picks in the offseason. When Muzzin goes on Ltir in game 1 they can add a 1 year rental D with his cap.So they'd get Meier or just this season and have to move him in the off-season, is that what you are suggesting they might do? So in other words, a "rental"
Kidding said, I understand he's under a teams control for a year so he's not a rental in the classic sense of the word, but if they can't keep him for another year due to contract demand or the QO, he's essentially still a rental in that they'd only have him for the remainder of this season. Would they be willing to give up a 1st and Knies in that scenario? I haven't followed the leafs enough these past couple of years to know so will rely on what others say.
If Toronto feels they can make a roster that will fit him in next year, then yeah, that's not a rental but I'll still be surprised to see that play out, regardless of what fans on HF put on paper that works.
That depends if we resign him long term in the offseason. If it is just for this season then noProbably the only player available for which i would give up Knies
Trade away the old toys for the new toysHow does Vegas have the assets/money to be in on everyone
I've said it once, and i'll say it again. Meier will be a Devil and the Devils will be trading Mercer.
I've said it once, and i'll say it again. Meier will be a Devil and the Devils will be trading Mercer.
Feels like Johnny hockey all over again.Too much speculation for nothing.
Timo will be a Devil. Fans of other teams should stop dreaming now to avoid big disappointment.
Could move him or Nylander in the off season. That would be the likely outcome. He gives an element to the Leafs top 6 that they don't have, so I could see a scenario where they would rather go with Meier over Nylander. But I really doubt the Leafs would get him.If he's not a rental how they gonna fit him next year......
Timo is not married. And his non-wife is not nurse.Feels like Johnny hockey all over again.