For all of the hand-wringing about Binner and Hockey Canada's goaltending selections, I think that Canada got the overall 2nd best goaltending of the 4 teams in the round robin. All of Canada, Sweden, and Finland saw their goalies allow multiple softies and look mechanically unsound. I don't think that Binner's best game was as good as the best goalie game we saw from Sweden or Finland, but both of those teams also got a goalie game that was worse than Binner's worst performance.
Lankinen was dreadful against Canada and the decision to leave him in so long before going to Saros probably cost them that game. Make no mistake, the Canada vs Finland game was won in net. Moneypuck had the expected goals at 4.004 to 1.755 in favor of Finland (excluding the empty netter). Binner allowed a stinker and Finland made a hell of a push at the end, but Lankinen was significantly worse than Binner was and that push at the end doesn't completely erase how well Binner played. Gustavsson looked shaky on the 2 goals he allowed vs Finland. Both were cross-crease plays, but he left his 5 hole massively wide open on goal #1 and then goal #2 was a flub that squeaked around him. I wouldn't call either a bad goal, but you can't allow both of those on just 4 shots against in 1st period. And then the OT winner against Ullmark was at least as soft as the worst goal Binner has allowed. All in all, Sweden's 2 goalies had a -1.65 goals above expected in this game, which cost them their tournament.
That's a game each for Sweden and Finland where their goalies allowed more than a goal above expected. Binner had 2 games with a negative goals above expected, but they were -0.54 and -0.69. He didn't dig a hole for his team nearly as deep as the worst hole Sweden and Finland had to try and overcome.
Avoiding the deep low meant that he statistically outperformed most of the field. Binner's SV% is 4th of the 8 goalies who saw action in the tournament and 2nd among the 6 goalies who played a single second in a game that was played before the championship matchup was set. His .892 isn't an impressive number, but it looks better than the .882, .870, .813, and .811 posted by Ullmark, Saros, Gustavsson, and Lankinen.
I get people making the argument that Canada could have gotten better goaltending and that Binner has allowed a softie each game. If the goalies were selected a week before the tournament then I think we'd have seen Blackwood and/or Thompson in these games. And I think it is reasonable to think that they would have had a good chance to outperform what Binner has done so far. But none of that means that Binner hasn't done his job. Binner was 'good enough' against Sweden and locked it down when needed with a few huge stops before Marner won it in OT. He got noticeably outplayed by Helly vs the USA, but he assisted on Canada's only goal with a nice play and was good enough that Canada would have at least gotten to OT if they had scored 2 goals. And then he was genuinely good against Finland to help them clinch a spot.
The general consensus entering this tournament is that Canada had the worst goaltending and that their path to success was for them to simply get goaltending that was 'good enough' to allow their superior offense to thrive. Binner has done that while 2 of the countries with a perceived edge in net watched their goalies give away games that turned out to be tournament-enders.