Proposal: All Bruins rumors/proposals: 16/17 Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

DitClapper

Registered User
May 15, 2014
7,896
348
Imagine the possibilities with a Landeskog-Krejci-Backes line. The nasty would be back.

Something's brewing.

 

chizzler

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 11, 2006
13,737
6,977
Isn't that how most trades work? You're either a buyer or seller...and very rarely is there a hockey trade between two contending teams.

Not two contending team but one bad and one good is usually the scenario. But I get it.
 

WhalerTurnedBruin55

Fading out, thanks for the times.
Oct 31, 2008
11,347
6,720
Isn't that how most trades work? You're either a buyer or seller...and very rarely is there a hockey trade between two contending teams.

We aren't a contending team (being realistic). We don't have to burn the team down, but making some moves for the betterment of the long term should be the plan instead of minimal short term gain.
 

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
I like landeskog alot... And I believe getting out of Colorado would be good for him... but that contract can't make sense unless we find a way to move belesky

We already have backes, marchand, pastrnak who will be paid like first line wingers... krecji and bergeron at center

If we go to 6 x 6 million front line guys there's no way to afford 3+ for 3rd line guys

To be honest I'd rather have landeskog and a kid making 6.75 next year than spooner and belesky... so I'm fine with this... I'm willing to give up our first... I'm willing to throw in a decent prospect ( not atop 3 one) And I'm assuming spooner

We have the assets to make it work... just need to make the cap work too

If it is langeskog and iginla
For spooner, first, debusk, hayes... I do this deal too
 

Jean_Jacket41

Neely = HOF
Jun 25, 2003
25,698
14,217
With the smurfs
Landeskog is a pipe dream. No way Sweeney pulls this off. But that would be a nice core for another run.

Next year:

Marchand-Bergy-Pasta
Landeskog-Krejci-Vatrano
Debrusk-Backes-Czarnik
Blidh-UFA-Heinen
 

Flannelman

Quiet, Gnashgab.
Dec 3, 2006
13,880
3,148
You're right about Hayes, Beleskey. If they bring in lando, they have got to find a way to move both at the culmination of this season, especially if they want to do more than a bridge w pasta. Very fair point
 

Sheppy

Registered User
Nov 23, 2011
58,680
64,633
The Arctic
Assuming they dump Beleskey or Hayes...

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
Landeskog - Krejci - Vatrano
Debrusk/Heinen - Backes - Czarnik
Blidh - Moore - Ferland

I'd like to see the Bruins add Ferland, too. I really like that guy.
 

Oates2Neely

Registered User
Jan 19, 2010
19,875
14,749
Massachusetts
I like landeskog alot... And I believe getting out of Colorado would be good for him... but that contract can't make sense unless we find a way to move belesky

We already have backes, marchand, pastrnak who will be paid like first line wingers... krecji and bergeron at center

If we go to 6 x 6 million front line guys there's no way to afford 3+ for 3rd line guys


To be honest I'd rather have landeskog and a kid making 6.75 next year than spooner and belesky... so I'm fine with this... I'm willing to give up our first... I'm willing to throw in a decent prospect ( not atop 3 one) And I'm assuming spooner

We have the assets to make it work... just need to make the cap work too

If it is langeskog and iginla
For spooner, first, debusk, hayes... I do this deal too

With all due respect, NOT paying 3rd line guys 3m is the goal. Youth on ELC's + veterans on short term/ money should make up the 3rd line.
 

Speed Shooter

Fly. Don't look, just fly.
Jul 6, 2010
768
62
God's Country
I want no part of trading Carlo, McAvoy or Lindgren for virtually any forward. There is plenty of room on this defense for all three, and we could desperately use them...even Lauzon would be hard to let go seeing how he's battled his way into minutes for Canada this year.

Definitely hoping Zboril is the D involved with any potential deals we might be trying to swing.

Would not trade Lindgren for "virtually any forward?"

Easy on the hype train, man.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad