BruinsFanSince94
The Perfect Fan ™
again, can we get Katz for JJ
Owners can't BE involved in trades, HUTCH
again, can we get Katz for JJ
Speed, puck handling, vision, confidence carrying the puck, two way play, big numbers in college as a 20 year old...I am asking this in all seriousness, what have people seen in Anders Bjork to make them believe he will be a good pro who can score?
Kessel makes what, $6.8m after TOR's retention. If the Pens want to retain another $1.8m or more, I would be all over that.
I like Donato, Zboril, Frederic, Studnicka, still hope Gabrielle comes around. The thing is I was legitimately serious in asking this, he hasn't shown me anything at a pro level and I dont watch college so I know very little about him. I see him being pencilled in as a top 6 forward and was curious what people thought about him and what stood out.In all seriousness is there a prospect you actually like?
I like Donato, Zboril, Frederic, Studnicka, still hope Gabrielle comes around. The thing is I was legitimately serious in asking this, he hasn't shown me anything at a pro level and I dont watch college so I know very little about him. I see him being pencilled in as a top 6 forward and was curious what people thought about him and what stood out.
I also dont like counting on prospects without a back up plan. I hope they all pan out (except Khokolochev)
This thread is going pretty much as I thought it would. Interesting, when most thought the Bruins were just a tweak or two away, most the proposals and discussion was reasonable. Now with the fan base wanting a major move to counter Toronto / Threat of Karlsson to TB, it has become a **** show.
I won't lie, I am bummed that the Bruins have been jumped by Toronto, I guess that's why I have been checking this thread so much. However, I just don't see a way this team can be improved in a major way without giving up top notch assets which would leave gaping holes.
Hoping Donny can surprise us, but at this point, he's got to be getting the feeling that he's watching from the sidelines - missing out on Tavares, Kovalchuk etc.
And get there healthy. You might see a different team.This team was a goal scoring machine last year. Who have they lost? Riley/Rick Nash? Khudobin? Step away from the ledge guys, it's gonna be alright. Even if they don't win it all next year, they're still a playoff team. Let's get there first and see what happens.
The team had such confidence in him that it gave him top six responsibilities right out of the gate. And, in his brief time here before injuries, seemed to validate its confidence in him.Speed, puck handling, vision, confidence carrying the puck, two way play, big numbers in college as a 20 year old...
Speed, puck handling, vision, confidence carrying the puck, two way play, big numbers in college as a 20 year old...
Exactly. Most believed they were 3-5 years away from being a true contender last year before start of visit. They overachieved last year and many of us, myself included, allowed that to alter our expectations for this year. Year 2. Not 5th or even 3rd.This team was a goal scoring machine last year. Who have they lost? Riley/Rick Nash? Khudobin? Step away from the ledge guys, it's gonna be alright. Even if they don't win it all next year, they're still a playoff team. Let's get there first and see what happens.
bjork is incredibly underrated around these parts, IMO. he learned a few good lessons this year (mainly don't
skate through the middle of the ice with your head down), and i saw glimpses of pretty high-end play from him.
he's behind the 8-ball a little bit with the injury/rehab, but i have a feeling he'll be 'ready' from day 1. love his
burst and energy out there, think he's a slam dunk top 9 guy.
And this is my argument about just relying on prospects. "They might be" "They could be ". I get the risks of rebuilding but they have done well so far, I hate the idea of just giving away seasons when a couple of moves could put you over the top. But I do look at winning one Cup every ten years or so as being much better than being a perennial contender that never wins.Absolutely. Bjork is probably my favorite of the Bruins' young wingers (including Debrusk, Donato and Heinen), and I like them all. I expect all four of them to be in the starting lineup next season. There's no reason that they cannot all be 20+ goal scorers, perhaps as soon as next season. For that reason, I don't really see the urgency for Boston to seek a trade to acquire a top-six winger.
Based on my small sample viewing size on Cehlarik, I would say:
Heinen has a shot/release as good as Cehlarik's or better, he just doesn't use it enough.
Heinen is a better skater (which is not saying much).
Heinen's passing is as good as anyone's.
Cehlarik is bigger.
Heinen has been much healthier.
I would love to see Cehlarik stay on the ice and show everyone what he's capable of. At the same time, I would not say he's "in the same boat as the other three". I think that Heinen, Donato, and Bjork (depending on health) are all ahead of Cehlarik at this point.
I believe it's clearly:
Heinen
Donato
Bjork
Cehlarik
As far as that group goes.
I don't care how pedestrian or vanilla Heinen's game seems to some people, the kid had 47 pts in 77 games in the NHL last year. Somehow, I keep seeing him lumped in with guys that spent most of the year in PRO, while he was a contributing member of the NHL club.
I don't get it.
And this is my argument about just relying on prospects. "They might be" "They could be ". I get the risks of rebuilding but they have done well so far, I hate the idea of just giving away seasons when a couple of moves could put you over the top. But I do look at winning one Cup every ten years or so as being much better than being a perennial contender that never wins.
Main complaint is still too many similar style prospects at forward and on the team. Again a couple tweaks and they could have one of the best forward groups in the league, even if Toronto had Tavares