As a package or individual trades
Need: elite young center with lots of speed
c'mon EJ, you're better and smarter than this!
1. Regardless of immediate need, must grow total level of talent which is usually only via steady, selective, opportunistic draft and development [b'c unless there are extenuating circumstances/gross misevaluation of talent, trading does not return better pieces].
Trades are for if/when opportunity knocks, and to then also deal from position of strength with surplus, not from position of weakness b'c of deficit. Example is the competition --- which drives up price --- of suitors for our young D. And we keep those D, except for Fox, b'c of need to have full roster w/depth, + cap compliant, etc.
2. Our pivot situation is not shallow.
Zib = 1st line guy
Chytil = 2nd line w/upside
Barron/Krav = 3rd line now no prob, w/upside
blais/Rooney etc etc = 4th line fully covered
Yes, we could use a high end prospect C [so can everyone else besides LAK], but availability and price prohibit that, and again, for umpteenth time, dealing youth = vets which damages cap structure and limits roster flexibility. I see here you went with 2 elcs for one elc, but my pt remains.
3. Patience.
Kakko may turn out to be Draisatil (very) lite and LaF was rated most complete/upside 1OA prospect since MacKinnon.
4. You need to join me in going in the correct direction.
We don't want to use LaF + KK to get a high end C; we want to use other pieces to get a high end C prospect to add to them.
Have something in mind for Kraken's Bernier
am busy now
will try to post this w'e
Don't be silly, bern's not going to let you trade bluest of blue chips.
Damn right!
empty words. he still responds in bern's threads.
bern champions free speech and is open to tolerance and discussion, even with those with whom he happens to disagree.
Obviously, from the above we may gleam you endorse the opposite.
Stand in the well of shame and ignominity that you deserve.