leetch99
Leetch66 Joined 2007
I think Stutzle will also be a very good player ...it takes time.Stutzle
I think Stutzle will also be a very good player ...it takes time.Stutzle
He’s on pace for 50 points. Laf on pace for about 32. Stutzle averages 18 minutes per game, to Lafreniere’s 13:57-14mins, with no PP time. It just goes to show you how potent narratives are when people start buy into them. They clearly don’t pay any attention to that stuff, nor do they watch Laf play. I would have some respect if someone openly admitted that they don’t watch enough of him or whatever.17 of Timbo’s points are on the power play. It’s insane how much people underestimate the importance of PP minutes for total production.
Next year.Slowly but surely figuring it out. He's still very far from a finished product.
Too bad that a guy shooting 18% cannot supplant a guy who has all of 3 goals this season on a top 3 PP playing with some of the best playmakers in the league.
I understand not wanting to fix something that's not broken but please for the love of God give Laf a chance.
And that's just on this board. Some of the comments are borderline ignorant.He’s on pace for 50 points. Laf on pace for about 32. Stutzle averages 18 minutes per game, to Lafreniere’s 13:57-14mins, with no PP time. It just goes to show you how potent narratives are when people start buy into them. They clearly don’t pay any attention to that stuff, nor do they watch Laf play. I would have some respect if someone openly admitted that they don’t watch enough of him or whatever.
Slowly but surely figuring it out. He's still very far from a finished product.
Too bad that a guy shooting 18% cannot supplant a guy who has all of 3 goals this season on a top 3 PP playing with some of the best playmakers in the league.
I understand not wanting to fix something that's not broken but please for the love of God give Laf a chance.
I mean...fine...but it's still easily the weakest part of his game and a very natural thing to point to that needs improvement.
It is a unique situation we have with our powerplay. Its been years since we had one this good, but at the same time Kakko and Lafreniere basically get no touches on it, which has been a hinderance to their development.
Even if Strome is gone, I'm not sure who else would come off that unit, so again one of them will be the odd man out. Considering he basically gets no quality power play time, Lafreniere's numbers are starting to look solid for a second year player.
This sentence is giving my Jimmy Vesey flashbacksWouldn't surprise me if he is a better playoff player than regular season.
The development piece is that it lets him see the ice better with far more space and time, if he then has success on it, it then forces teams to back up off him even at 5v5, which then gives him more time and space.I don't know how much of a hindarance lack of PP1 time has been with regards to development. Its more of a hindrance to stats. I'd say the bigger hindrance with development has been poor linemates/poor chemistry with linemates. Guys like Lundell manage to produce on the third line with minimal PP time because of the style Florida plays and him having quality linemates. With Chytil looking better recently Laf looks good on the third line. And once Kakko comes back they will have him, Vatrano or Copp at RW which is a step above Goodrow and like 15 steps above Gauthier.
Love Copp, but there is no reason for Laf not to be on PP1 next year.The development piece is that it lets him see the ice better with far more space and time, if he then has success on it, it then forces teams to back up off him even at 5v5, which then gives him more time and space.
As stupid as it might sound, it may be better off, cap wise, to put Kakko there. He'd already be under contract/bridged for 2+ seasons.Love Copp, but there is no reason for Laf not to be on PP1 next year.
Does the LHS thing mean Kakko might be a better fit too?As stupid as it might sound, it may be better off, cap wise, to put Kakko there. He'd already be under contract/bridged for 2+ seasons.
Paying Laffy w/ PP1 production could get expensive
I almost wonder if the NYR know this and that's why they're trying to balance everything the best they can so that they can ice a competitive team going forward? It makes you wonder. Because does Gallant honestly not think Laf or Kakko can play the bumper as effectively as Strome?As stupid as it might sound, it may be better off, cap wise, to put Kakko there. He'd already be under contract/bridged for 2+ seasons.
Paying Laffy w/ PP1 production could get expensive
It would make logistical sense.I almost wonder if the NYR know this and that's why they're trying to balance everything the best they can so that they can ice a competitive team going forward? It makes you wonder. Because does Gallant honestly not think Laf or Kakko can play the bumper as effectively as Strome?