Shadowtron
Registered User
Let’s look on the bright side…he’s having a career year in assists! That’s something, right? :shrugs::
For sure penalty minutesLet’s look on the bright side…he’s having a career year in assists! That’s something, right? :shrugs::
I read this in Laff’s voice lol.For sure penalty minutes
1 game point scoring streak
Seriously, though, this has been his best game (stupid penalty aside) in quite a while.
GOOD GRAVY! hahahaha.View attachment 638158
Laffy trying to convince tourists he was a 1st overall NHL pick in Time’s Square 5 years from now.
and keep your first round picks.Kreider is signed through 26-27 but luckily Panarin's contract only runs until 25-26.
All we have to do is be patient until the 26-27 season and then we'll see what Laf can really do.
And Kakko is on pace for 36pts in his D+4I remember waking up from a nap reading that we got the 1st overall pick. Elation would be an understatement.
NYPost article maybe, something like: "Rangers Win Lottery, Right to Draft Alexis Lafreniere".
And I said to myself, imagine he busts? That would be the most Rangers thing ever. We were already slightly concerned with Kakko at this time.
..And here it is, nearing the breaking point. If he's not producing something like 0.7 Points/Game between now and thru next season, can we officially call him a bust? That's like 57 points over 82 games.
For God's sake. There's a 90% chance he's a complete Yakupov/Daigle at this point.
It's so depressing.
One really needs to question the whole “best player available” mantra.I don’t play enough hockey to understand how a LW can’t learn to play RW
Laf will get better but he’s blocked at LW. It’s so weird that getting 2nd or 3rd pick would of been best to draft Stutzle since he’s a C
Also getting 1st Hughes over Kakko
Especially considering the franchise’s hole at center, I can sympathize with this mindset.One really needs to question the whole “best player available” mantra.
Im not going to kill the Rangers for these picks, because they absolutely were the consensus. But when it comes to drafting wingers, you really, really need to consider the importance of the position when making these selections. The player has to be much, much better than the best available C or D given how relatively unimportant the position is.
Ovechkin is the consensus 1OA? Ok. That’s one thing.
But when it comes to the non-generational types (we knew Kakko and Laf were not that), this is an important consideration for me. What’s more valuable, an 80 point winger or a 60 point center? This might be stretching the comparison, but I personally want the center every time.
I don’t think Laf has even learned to play LW yet lolI don’t play enough hockey to understand how a LW can’t learn to play RW
Laf will get better but he’s blocked at LW. It’s so weird that getting 2nd or 3rd pick would of been best to draft Stutzle since he’s a C
Also getting 1st Hughes over Kakko
Well we would have ended up with Byfield… so…One really needs to question the whole “best player available” mantra.
Im not going to kill the Rangers for these picks, because they absolutely were the consensus. But when it comes to drafting wingers, you really, really need to consider the importance of the position when making these selections. The player has to be much, much better than the best available C or D given how relatively unimportant the position is.
Ovechkin is the consensus 1OA? Ok. That’s one thing.
But when it comes to the non-generational types (we knew Kakko and Laf were not that), this is an important consideration for me. What’s more valuable, an 80 point winger or a 60 point center? This might be stretching the comparison, but I personally want the center every time.
I think that's why Byfield was originally considered to be the 1OA for at least a year before the draft. I remember people coming up with so many scenarios where we could somehow trade up to the #1 spot to draft him.One really needs to question the whole “best player available” mantra.
Im not going to kill the Rangers for these picks, because they absolutely were the consensus. But when it comes to drafting wingers, you really, really need to consider the importance of the position when making these selections. The player has to be much, much better than the best available C or D given how relatively unimportant the position is.
Ovechkin is the consensus 1OA? Ok. That’s one thing.
But when it comes to the non-generational types (we knew Kakko and Laf were not that), this is an important consideration for me. What’s more valuable, an 80 point winger or a 60 point center? This might be stretching the comparison, but I personally want the center every time.
Considering our depth at center then (or lack thereof), I would have taken Byfield.Well we would have ended up with Byfield… so…
And we’d be worse off than we are now. Laf was the consensus 1OA. in scout polls it was pretty much unanimous, it wasn’t like Byfield was close. Unless we traded down to 2OA we simply couldn’t risk picking Byfield. And you think Laf is catching a rash of shit? He’d have been know as Bustfield on here halfway through D+1.I think that's why Byfield was originally considered to be the 1OA for at least a year before the draft. I remember people coming up with so many scenarios where we could somehow trade up to the #1 spot to draft him.
Considering our depth at center then (or lack thereof), I would have taken Byfield.
That may be.....I'm just recalling (or trying to) the events leading up to the draft....I don't recall Laffy's name coming up until later...kind of like Kakko....he seemed to come out of nowhere.And we’d be worse off than we are now. Laf was the consensus 1OA. in scout polls it was pretty much unanimous, it wasn’t like Byfield was close. Unless we traded down to 2OA we simply couldn’t risk picking Byfield. And you think Laf is catching a rash of shit? He’d have been know as Bustfield on here halfway through D+1.
Nah. Laf was one of those guys that was getting 1OA buzz as a 15 year old.That may be.....I'm just recalling (or trying to) the events leading up to the draft....I don't recall Laffy's name coming up until later...kind of like Kakko....he seemed to come out of nowhere.
Lol what?? Laf was about as consensus 1st overall as they come for years. He was hyped since he was like 15. He was supposed to be a tier below McDavid. On MacKinnons level.I think that's why Byfield was originally considered to be the 1OA for at least a year before the draft. I remember people coming up with so many scenarios where we could somehow trade up to the #1 spot to draft him.
Considering our depth at center then (or lack thereof), I would have taken Byfield.
Yeah, Laf was the front runner for a couple of years but I think D-1 Byfield did have some traction.Lol what?? Laf was about as consensus 1st overall as they come for years. He was hyped since he was like 15. He was supposed to be a tier below McDavid. On MacKinnons level.