Harbour Dog
Registered User
Paywalled
Man, that backhander was deadly. Seamless transition from 'this is going to be a pass' to 'this is going just under the bar'.
Paywalled
Man, that backhander was deadly. Seamless transition from 'this is going to be a pass' to 'this is going just under the bar'.
Paywalled
I’m obviously happy that he’s been scoring points regularly for over a week now.Are the impatient people becoming less so now or are you still unhappy?
No this is spot on. He is at least getting possession a lot more now, and actually doing more things with the puck. Still lazy on the forecheck and lot of floating.Maybe I’m stretching here, but I feel like he has been a lot more noticeable the past 3-4 games. Still plenty of mistakes, lazy forechecks, etc, but he’s touching the puck a lot, and the points are coming as a result.
Every time I read “The Athletic” I see “The Atlantic” and wonder when one of the most respected left-leaning magazines start covering hockey.Man, that backhander was deadly. Seamless transition from 'this is going to be a pass' to 'this is going just under the bar'.
He's going to be good in a year or two. He's already doing great things out there every night. He had a beautiful pass to Zib in the neutral zone that looked like was going to give zib a break away if he didn't cough up the puck.
points in the last three games and you call it a stretch?Maybe I’m stretching here, but I feel like he has been a lot more noticeable the past 3-4 games. Still plenty of mistakes, lazy forechecks, etc, but he’s touching the puck a lot, and the points are coming as a result.
It is nothing but sheer luck. We know the kid has already been ruined by his evil stepfather of a coach. Just like Kakko. Just like Chytil.Let that puck luck flow, baby...
points in the last three games and you call it a stretch?
Well...pretty much.Same story with every player:
Is xGF good?
If NO, bad player.
If YES, is GF good?
If NO, good player with bad luck.
If YES, good player with correct luck.
*yawn
Well...pretty much.
Besides, that’s not like “Alexis Lafreniere has 69 expected goals”, it’s literally every shot location, shot type, and what happened after the shot.
You don’t even have to look at the ixG, the shot locations are the main thing.
Oh my bad.I wrote that at the same time you posted the chart, so it looked like a response, but had nothing to do with that specifically.
Shot location, xGs, etc. all interesting, to a point. I find it lazy to just throw everything that troubles those data points into 'luck'.
Then again, I'm not ever in here saying or even implying the kid's a bust or something. Just really unimpressed/concerned with what I'm seeing from a player development pov.
Oh my bad.![]()