"What if?" cuts both ways though. What's the upside in this case? If we had teams that needed to be instructed to work out to be fit, then those teams weren't worth a shit to begin with. So the nebulous idea that Ovi conducting himself better would have rubbed off in some transformational way isn't convincing to me.
What seems far more likely is that a naturally indestructible guy becoming a gym rat to push the boundaries of that ability would have broken himself a time or two, perhaps irreparably.
For 20 years with remarkable, unmatched consistency, this team has had one guy be amazing in a way that no other guy has ever been in 50 years. To look at that guy as deficient somehow, instead of focusing on all the other pieces that weren't enough or didn't work out or couldn't take themselves seriously or couldn't coach effectively and on and on, is a perspective I just can't wrap my head around.
Yes, Ovi could have been better at some things. But you have one guy moving mountains for you while everyone else is carrying pillows and you want to blame him for his lack of effort? He's literally the best ever at the thing that matters most and yet you want MORE from him?
It's like standing at the finish line of the longest marathon ever, waiting for the winner that just literally finished faster than anyone ever has, and saying, "Pffft. You could have been faster. And you not being faster is why everyone else is slower. Your stunning, world-class achievement is disappointing to me. Impressive, but not nearly impressive enough. Do better."
Look, I get that this is just one of those "just sayin" types of hokey observations, but it's bananas.