I don't know how anyone could watch that Rangers game last night and not see Ovechkin playing very well, challenging for pucks in the corners, battling for position around the next, making nice passes, creating chances - and not see how he was a billion percent better against the Rangers than he had been for the previous few games.
Yes, it's absurd that teams top scorer gets the most ice-time. Just absurd.He's not currently dangerous enough to do damage in a regular season game.
And this team is no way guaranteed to make the playoffs (but I think they might sneak in but long way to go this season).
I think they should scratch him for a game. He continues to get the most ice time (yes including PP) and that is absurd.
It's patently obvious something is wrong with him. Injury, age, or maybe his heart / head isn't where it needs to be. The only people who think otherwise are in denial. Maybe he's in denial as well. It would make more sense for him to be because of pride and being an elite competitor.Yes, it's absurd that teams top scorer gets the most ice-time. Just absurd.
It's not at all absurd to suggest scratching the teams top scorer. Because why shouldn't we be like the Blue Jackets?
It's entirely different conversation to talk about reducing his minutes on a back-to-back nights than suggesting to scratch him entirely. One sends a headline message all across the league.It's patently obvious something is wrong with him. Injury, age, or maybe his heart / head isn't where it needs to be. The only people who think otherwise are in denial. Maybe he's in denial as well. It would make more sense for him to be because of pride and being an elite competitor.
I thought he had a pretty good game against the Rangers - probably his best game in a while. But this one after travelling and a back to back against the Hawks? Not so much. So that's fatigure or frustration / mental disconnect maybe? Who knows.
I don't think it's sacrilege to suggest reducing his ice time by 2 minutes a game, or giving him a game off here and there to rest up (obviously me using the word scratch was triggering, lol). They - probably because he is demanding it himself - are trying to force the goals by playing 1st line minutes and continuing to be out for every single minute of PP time. Wouldn't hurt to play 1:30 instead of 2 minutes, would it?
I know it's a polarizing subject around here and there is a view that some of us are putting the boot in and shitting on him. I'm definitely not doing that: I just think some time management could be beneficial - but like every other person here, I don't know what is actually ailing him. So it might not make any difference at all.
It's not sacrilege, it just doesn't make sense. If a somewhat struggling 38-year-old leads the team in points, giving his ice time (which isn't egregious, it's less than 20 minutes a game) to some other player probably won't solve the team's problems.I don't think it's sacrilege to suggest reducing his ice time by 2 minutes a game, or giving him a game off here and there to rest up (obviously me using the word scratch was triggering, lol). They - probably because he is demanding it himself - are trying to force the goals by playing 1st line minutes and continuing to be out for every single minute of PP time. Wouldn't hurt to play 1:30 instead of 2 minutes, would it?
I kinda think if you change "is built" to "was built", he has that right. I think that was the focus of Ted and his minions coming into the season, with BMac leading the guerilla effort to move the team forward. But I think Carbs has done such a masterful, jujitsu job of laying bare the holdover core's fatal defects, and then moving on from them piece by piece and bringing this team's style of play into the 2020s that that statement is no longer right.At 4:50 the guy says "the whole systen in Washington is built around Ovie getting that record".
Sigh - these talking heads don't watch the games, do they?
I love the optimism. But what scares me is that he isn’t even really generating chances. In the past when he had these cold streaks he would still have opportunities, they just wouldn’t go in. He hasn’t had more than 5 shots on goal since October and most games he only has 2 or 3. He has never looked this slow and invisible and it’s hard to imagine this would get better. Only way is if he really spends the off-season entirely revamping his conditioning and nutrition plan.Ovechkin has scored 40+ goals or at that pace in shortened seasons EXCEPT for, wait for it:
6th, 7th and 12th season in the league. He's in season #19. Even if the team wasn't lacking in a number of areas, streaks/runs DO happen.
I mean, I get it, but age 39 and 40 is not a guarantee that he'll do WORSE. Selanne is just one precedent of a guy who upgraded his totals in some later seasons.
So let's just say he finishes this year at say 19 total. That doesn't mean he can't hit 30+ the following year even at age 39 just given his sample size.
Come on….he knows the record will be hard to achieve in ANY way….Not many reasons to play if he deems record hard to achieve in some reasonable way
Gods I hope so….feels like he could have physically adapted a few years ago….now it feels like there’s no turning back….like I don’t see him suddenly cutting 15lbs and being agile again….would be amazing if he could do that….just needs to score a few and see if he can heat up….I have a feeling Ovi likes hockey so much he'll play until he is no longer allowed to. With his build, strength and smarts he could go the Andreychuk route for sure.
You forgot: "Leads the team in assists & points".Isn't scoring, can't puck handle, can't defend, doesn't move on offense. Anyone else would be benched/waived. I'd love to see him hit the record but I'd rather see Stanley Cup #2, #3, etc in Washington. He's an anchor at this point and not in a good way
No i think this Ovi is what we'll see. The extra lbs protect against injury at least. But yeah, im with you.Gods I hope so….feels like he could have physically adapted a few years ago….now it feels like there’s no turning back….like I don’t see him suddenly cutting 15lbs and being agile again….would be amazing if he could do that….just needs to score a few and see if he can heat up….
I don't think keeping Ovie around is preventing the Caps from winning another Cup.Isn't scoring, can't puck handle, can't defend, doesn't move on offense. Anyone else would be benched/waived. I'd love to see him hit the record but I'd rather see Stanley Cup #2, #3, etc in Washington. He's an anchor at this point and not in a good way
Fair point, YippieKaey!You forgot: "Leads the team in assists & points".
No i think this Ovi is what we'll see. The extra lbs protect against injury at least. But yeah, im with you.
I think it's all of it together. He's a family man now and probably feeling it with the body but won't admit it. He's had a lot hit him in the past several years and the endless questions about the records add up. Kind of annoying every press conference they mention it. I don't think anyone is saying you're dumping on Ovy. I don't believe anyone is. He's in a situation we all face at his age, especially someone with a history of physical sports, hard labor, or a military career. The key thing for him to do is adapt and accept some changes like with PP time or slots. If he does that, then folks will complain about his contract. Nobody will ever be satisfied. It's the sad reality of professional sports.It's patently obvious something is wrong with him. Injury, age, or maybe his heart / head isn't where it needs to be. The only people who think otherwise are in denial. Maybe he's in denial as well. It would make more sense for him to be because of pride and being an elite competitor.
I thought he had a pretty good game against the Rangers - probably his best game in a while. But this one after travelling and a back to back against the Hawks? Not so much. So that's fatigure or frustration / mental disconnect maybe? Who knows.
I don't think it's sacrilege to suggest reducing his ice time by 2 minutes a game, or giving him a game off here and there to rest up (obviously me using the word scratch was triggering, lol). They - probably because he is demanding it himself - are trying to force the goals by playing 1st line minutes and continuing to be out for every single minute of PP time. Wouldn't hurt to play 1:30 instead of 2 minutes, would it?
I know it's a polarizing subject around here and there is a view that some of us are putting the boot in and shitting on him. I'm definitely not doing that: I just think some time management could be beneficial - but like every other person here, I don't know what is actually ailing him. So it might not make any difference at all.