Havoc
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2009
- 7,334
- 7,600
Give Kerfoot second line usage and top PP on a good year and he probably only manages tying Kadri having a bad year and even then I wouldn't bet any money on it.off-season? Why is it an off-season?
And yes - Kadri needs full 2nd line usage and top Pp usage to be a 50pt guy with bad defense.
And not one person on that thread wants Kadri back unless he takes a discount. Not one.
Also given our current circumstances Kadri is currently more useful than Kerfoot because our PP is costing us games and could potentially cost us a playoff series. So focusing on their ES points like you did doesn't actually give a fair comparison.
And agreed on last sentence. That goes for us as well.