TheStuntman
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2015
- 800
- 743
24,300 followers is next no followers?If it’s an “NHL insider” with next to no followers, they’re not legitimate sources.
24,300 followers is next no followers?
This isn't isolated but a consistent thing that is happening to people's posts and not just mine.
None of us want to trade Zegras and we are all sick of the trade threads that pop up but deleting information because you don't agree with it is wrong. If it's bad info then we can discuss it and and move on.
What are people going to think of the mods here if it comes out that the rumors were true and you have been spending your time trying to cover them up?
It's not a one time thing or even isolated to my postings. The follower count I quoted was for Anthony SanFilippo who writes for Philadelphia teams.Which "insider" are we talking about here? Having a following does not mean they deserve to be considered a legit source, the majority of those guys are complete hacks.
24,300 followers is next no followers?
This isn't isolated but a consistent thing that is happening to people's posts and not just mine.
None of us want to trade Zegras and we are all sick of the trade threads that pop up but deleting information because you don't agree with it is wrong. If it's bad info then we can discuss it and and move on.
What are people going to think of the mods here if it comes out that the rumors were true and you have been spending your time trying to cover them up?
The link that was deleted here was an account that started in 2019 and has 3,100 followers. It’s not a legit account. If you’re on the trade boards, then they’re even stricter.24,300 followers is next no followers?
This isn't isolated but a consistent thing that is happening to people's posts and not just mine.
None of us want to trade Zegras and we are all sick of the trade threads that pop up but deleting information because you don't agree with it is wrong. If it's bad info then we can discuss it and and move on.
What are people going to think of the mods here if it comes out that the rumors were true and you have been spending your time trying to cover them up?
I would trade Mac before Z. Z is more impactful to the team than Mac IMO. Mac plus something else should grab a really good piece coming back our way. In fact, Mac should stay on the wing and Z should be the playmaking center in the next game.I'm only okay with trading Zegras if its for a massive upgrade. I just know he will blossom elsewhere and I have thought he has looked good this season for the most part, points aside.
Hanging around the distant reaches of the Western Conference playoff race, the Ducks are showing signs of turning a corner following six consecutive seasons well out of that mix. While general manager Pat Verbeek may elect to move veteran defenseman Brian Dumoulin, that doesn’t make him a seller. At least not to the degree he’s been in recent years. The Ducks would also be open to trading John Gibson, although there don’t seem to be any teams currently shopping for a goaltender in his price range. Gibson is willing to waive a no-trade clause to go to Edmonton — the Oilers insist they aren’t in the goalie market — and Anaheim has had on-again, off-again conversations with Carolina going back to last summer. They seem to be (mostly) off now. Add it all together and it may end up being a quiet deadline period in Anaheim.
It appears that Gibson probably finishes his contract in Anaheim at this point.
I don’t mind having him here at all but the idea of trading him isn’t to get a late round pick. The idea would be to retain 50% on him and receive a reasonable asset in return. With his performance this season I don’t think it’s that far-fetched although at the end of the day it comes down to if there’s enough suitors out there for him.I’ve said this over and over again , Gibby here and supporting Dostal is more important than a late round pick. They are at .500 because both goalies have not been burnt out this season sharing the work load.