If your team needs a shooter trying to find his shooting way, what do you have to offer for Alex Newhook?
Wasn’t he just dealt for a 1 st ?If your team needs a shooter trying to find his shooting way, what do you have to offer for Alex Newhook?
Second season with the habs, has 2 years left on his deal after this season, played 55 games out of 82 last season.Wasn’t he just dealt for a 1 st ?
And an early 2nd.Wasn’t he just dealt for a 1 st ?
Why, exactly, do the Ducks entertain that offer? Zegras may be traded at some point but it’s not for a downgrade. It’ll be in a package for an upgrade, a player who fits whatever Verbeek is trying to build, or for a different position of need. Newhook is none of those.Not sure he carries any positive value at this point. Soft, one dimensional, missed a lot of time last year to injury and now just 2 goals in 9 games this year? With another 2.5 years left on his deal.
Wouldn't get any positive value but maybe a swap for another similarly struggling player. Like a Peyton Krebs or maybe a Kaapo Kakko(Though he's having a decent start to his year so maybe not).
One "bigger" scenario I could see playing out would be a Newhook+ for Zegras+ type of deal.
General rule around NHL should be to not trade for prospects drafted by Avs.Not really sure what he's good at. But he's also not glaringly awful at most things either. Avs scouting staff seemed to have a real knack for finding those sorta guys for a bunch of years there.
A Kaapo Kakko swap would be interesting, but I'm not sure Rags offer it plain.Not sure he carries any positive value at this point. Soft, one dimensional, missed a lot of time last year to injury and now just 2 goals in 9 games this year? With another 2.5 years left on his deal.
Wouldn't get any positive value but maybe a swap for another similarly struggling player. Like a Peyton Krebs or maybe a Kaapo Kakko(Though he's having a decent start to his year so maybe not).
One "bigger" scenario I could see playing out would be a Newhook+ for Zegras+ type of deal.
I don't think this means as much as you think it means. He entered the league 1 year after being drafted. 3 of the top 15 were dman.2019 draft class - drafted 16th
Games played- 6th
Points - 10th
Goals - 8th
Newhook is 23...
Cap hit (of all players 24U) - 39th
Zero chance KH moves him for anything short of a steep overpayment, considerably more than the picks it cost to get him.
Can confirmGeneral rule around NHL should be to not trade for prospects drafted by Avs.
If your team needs a shooter trying to find his shooting way ...
His value has only dropped since KH overpaid for him the first time.2019 draft class - drafted 16th
Games played- 6th
Points - 10th
Goals - 8th
Newhook is 23...
Cap hit (of all players 24U) - 39th
Zero chance KH moves him for anything short of a steep overpayment, considerably more than the picks it cost to get him.
Only amongst fans who largely fail to grasp actual player value... See every other trade thread lolHis value has only dropped since KH overpaid for him the first time.
Really ? Doesn’t Dach have a ton more potential ? Newhook is just a blah player . Reminds me of the Dvorak deal . Too much for a middling talentI'd keep him
He's been good for us, he ain't the center I'd trade (that would be Dach)
That's a great point. Often we are always shooting for the next great thing when a bird in hand...Here we go. It seems like everyone in Montreal is allergic to depth.
No, Newhook isn’t a top 6 forward. He’s better suited on the third line and second PP but what (Habs) fans needs to understand is you need players like that to win. Not everyone can or should be a top 6 and it doesn’t mean they don’t have any value if they aren’t superstars.
Newhook isn’t going anywhere.
Dvorak is literally the most vanilla player Montreal has spent good assets on in quite a while.Really ? Doesn’t Dach have a ton more potential ? Newhook is just a blah player . Reminds me of the Dvorak deal . Too much for a middling talent