yep AINEC.Barkov for both
Barkov has hardware that Getz was nowhere close to getting.
I think it's really close but either way unless Barkov falls off a cliff he is only 29 and will end up having the better career.I think recency bias is going to cloud this a bit but I’d still go Barkov for better player. Getz was good defensively himself and was a better playmaker but Barkov is a better goal scorer and better defensively. Offensively it’s close but Barkov’s defensive edge wins out. Getzlaf’s career length and playoff record might have him ahead for career currently though. He also had better points and point per game finishes. I think people forget that Getzlaf was one of the best playoff producers for a good period. From ‘07 to ‘17 he was 5th in playoff points and 2nd in playoff points per game to Crosby. He was also runner up to the Hart and Art Ross in 13-14.
Barkov has hardware that Getz was nowhere close to getting.
The 2010s weren't really that long ago and people are already comparing the raw stats of that era to the current one.The fact that Barkov already has both a Selke and a 96 point season, when Getzlaf didn't achieve either of these tells me all that I'd need to pick the big Finnish forward.
Barkov had 96 points in 18-19, which was in the 10s... Or what do you mean?The 2010s weren't really that long ago and people are already comparing the raw stats of that era to the current one.
There was quite a few unappreciated centers in the shadow of Malkin, Crosby, Toews, Bergeron and even Stamkos. But Getzlaf might be at the top of that list...
he was injured in some of his best seasons. But 5 seasons finishing top 10 in PPG is really damn good. Im pretty sure that's only bested by Crosby, Malkin and Thornton for centers from 2005-2015.
The poster I quoted compared Barkov's 96 point season to Getzlaf's lower career high, despite both happening in vastly different scoring environments.Barkov and Barkov
Barkov had 96 points in 18-19, which was in the 10s... Or what do you mean?
Barkov and Barkov
Barkov had 96 points in 18-19, which was in the 10s... Or what do you mean?
I think it's really close but either way unless Barkov falls off a cliff he is only 29 and will end up having the better career.
Pretty good and even poll if one stop to think about it.
Career should include everything but a handful of games doesn't make much of a difference one would think.Does career include Olympics
Yes surely Barkov is the worse player because he didn't get carried by other centers that are better than him.Does career include Olympics
You serious with this ?The fact that Barkov already has both a Selke and a 96 point season, when Getzlaf didn't achieve either of these tells me all that I'd need to pick the big Finnish forward.