Confirmed with Link: Alain Vigneault fired

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What part of the current administration would lead you to believe they'll go with a retread? They seem to be pretty forward thinking.

I actually worry about the opposite. Ironically after my comment of familiar vs unfamiliar I think that outside of that aspect of it the reason there are so many retreads is because so much new blood fails.
 
Would I be correct in saying coaches and leaders of every kind prefer a 50% chance of failure with the familiar than a 25% chance of failure with the unfamiliar?

Absolutely, sometimes even shockingly worse. Some people unconsciously choose a minimal chance of success (<10%) sticking with what they know vs. a huge opportunity for success (>50%) with the unfamiliar. Beyond the SCARF model, there are a number of cognitive biases that mess with our perception of risk, probability, and cause of outcomes (confirmation bias, choice-supportive bias, appeal to probability fallacy, and more).
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
I actually worry about the opposite. Ironically after my comment of familiar vs unfamiliar I think that outside of that aspect of it the reason there are so many retreads is because so much new blood fails.

I mean the simpler answer is coaching hockey is 1) hard and 2) has a high degree of randomness in outcomes.

In a given year only 5-6 teams are 'happy' with what they did or achieved. That's a lot of disappointment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
I actually worry about the opposite. Ironically after my comment of familiar vs unfamiliar I think that outside of that aspect of it the reason there are so many retreads is because so much new blood fails.

Same reason why new TV shows fail yet mediocre shows get renewed. Flawed belief that it's easier to take mediocre to great than it is to take a struggling new show to great. A show that is consistently mediocre rarely explodes but a new show with a strong premise, but needing some tweaks, can become great. Gets back to risk and fear - TV execs don't get fired for a lot of mediocrity but they do get fired for a few big best that fail.
 
Or maybe they said, "This guy has been a good coach for us. Won a lot of games. Won a lot of playoff series in his tenure. He's no longer right for us. We need to move in a new direction. There's no reason to keep him twisting in the wind, so let's let him go. We'll move on. He can get a jump on finding his next job. Its the right thing to do."

Absolutely.

Your speculation is as good as mine.

The right thing to do in any case. It's time to begin a new era and this just felt like an exclamation point to me. Can't wait to see what comes next.
 
Will never forgive him for his undying love affair for Glass, and ultimately running Stempniak out of town. We desperately could have used Stempniak's depth scoring in the playoffs that season.

13-14 was the most fun I have ever had watching the Rangers, so thanks for that AV, but other than that it's been underwhelming to say the least.
 
Or maybe they said, "This guy has been a good coach for us. Won a lot of games. Won a lot of playoff series in his tenure. He's no longer right for us. We need to move in a new direction. There's no reason to keep him twisting in the wind, so let's let him go. We'll move on. He can get a jump on finding his next job. Its the right thing to do."
I hardly think waiting until the Monday presser, or even after all the exit interviews are done later this week, would qualify as "twisting in the wind". He'd still be out early enough for every potential suitor to be aware he was available. There was definitely something (less than positive) to the timing, IMO.
 
Same reason why new TV shows fail yet mediocre shows get renewed. Flawed belief that it's easier to take mediocre to great than it is to take a struggling new show to great. A show that is consistently mediocre rarely explodes but a new show with a strong premise, but needing some tweaks, can become great. Gets back to risk and fear - TV execs don't get fired for a lot of mediocrity but they do get fired for a few big best that fail.
Same reason companies are so loath to hire new blood as CEOs/the "old boy" network is so strong in so many industries. The BoD can point to the resume and say "hey, can't blame us for the company's performance, we picked a guy with experience." There's a good deal of CYA in there (along with the well-documented discrimination).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gresch04
I hardly think waiting until the Monday presser, or even after all the exit interviews are done later this week, would qualify as "twisting in the wind". He'd still be out early enough for every potential suitor to be aware he was available. There was definitely something (less than positive) to the timing, IMO.

Yep. Felt like a bit of a dropkick to me as well. Though I'm certain they will claim nothing was amiss.

Nothing like a little Palace Intrigue to kick this rebuild into high gear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad