MakoSlade
Registered User
I don't think people realize how sub-par of a season Hedman had in his sophomore year. Lots of people were ready to label him a bust.
I remember that. Quite clearly. Glad someone else does...
I don't think people realize how sub-par of a season Hedman had in his sophomore year. Lots of people were ready to label him a bust.
I remember that. Quite clearly. Glad someone else does...
Great all-situations defensemen don't happen overnight. Remember how down everyone was on Niedermeyer in the 90's? Everyone was expecting him to score on an end-to-end rush every time he touched the puck. Given time, he found his game.
I see Larsson developing a nice (Ottawa-era)Redden-esque style game.
Mike Green was terrible as well until his third season. Giving up on Larsson is foolish.I also remember it very well he was horrible.
Nieds became elite fairly quickly. I don't see the comparison.
I don't think anyone is comparing Larsson to Nied's in terms of style of play. Nied's was a GREAT skater. It was his biggest strength.Biggest difference between everyone Larsson is being compared to especially Neids is Larrson cannot skate on the level he needs too. His O is weak because he is not good at the point. He gets beat by too often, trails the play way too much. His smarts and reach compensated for his lack of footwork and skating for so long that now when he needs to be on that higher level its not there. If he can improve his skating everything else will fall in place if not hes going to become a good maybe even very good sah D but never develop into what the 4th choice in the draft should but I dont see bust like Thomas Hickey was.
Mike Green was terrible as well until his third season. Giving up on Larsson is foolish.
Why are we trying to compare Larsson with players like Karlsson and Niedermayer?
Larsson can't skate as good as both of those players and that's why he'll never be like them. Adam is a smart d-men with a long reach and terrible foot speed. The players mentionned above have ELITE skating and played smart defense but going with body position over physical force.
The kid is 20 years of age, his skating technique can be improved over the next couple of years and to me, that's probably the easiest thing to learn/upgrade as a hockey player. I'm not saying he'll skate like the wind ala Niedermayer but he needs work on his pivots and his 1st step, that's for sure.
If we wanted someone that could skate like Nieds, Letang or Karlsson... we should've went with Ryan Murphy cause that kid can flat out skate but we wouldn't have all the other assets Larsson can give us in terms of overall skills.
One thing I'm hoping for next year is that Larsson plays in all 82 games, injuries put aside of course and for that happen, Lou needs to do something about our ****ing blueline so that Pete doesn't pull the same game of musical chair as soon as a rookie commits a error.
If Lou wants a 20 year old on our roster, well then let's live with the consequences of his growing pains, if not, just send him somewhere we're he'll play heavy minutes and learn on the fly, like Albany. Having a 1st pairing of Larsson/Merrill in Albany wouldn't be the end world and would actually build chemistry between the two players since both of them look to be future of our blueline.
someone call the television crew in cause we got a bust on our hands
Not only is Larsson a smart player, but people are often seeing his 'lack of intensity' as a problem. I think what people are incorrectly seeing his is consistent, even demeanor. And with that I think will come hockey consistency as well. His head is in the right place, he has the physical tools, and now he needs to put it all together. He's young, he's got plenty of time.
Nicklas Lidstrom didn't have an "urgent" style of play. He wasn't very physical or fleet of foot either.