Dekes For Days
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2018
- 22,091
- 16,633
Don't try and put words in my mouth. You have no clue what I think, and no, that's not what I said at all.That is precisely what he thinks. When all of his other reasoning flops that is always his fall-back argument. He can't even use the sample size BS with playoffs, it's 6 years of sample size of the Leafs PP falling of a cliff in the playoffs.
Also, we don't have a 6 year sample size of the Leaf's PP falling off a cliff in the playoffs. For the record, our top unit actually produced well in the 2017, 2018, and 2019 playoffs, and our PP% was higher in the playoffs than the regular season in 2018. Rielly actually has a better on-ice GF/60 in the playoffs than the regular season over those 3 years. Our secondary units struggled, and we faced a ridiculous Boston PP with a lacking PK.
Even in 2020, the top unit did produce less on the PP, but when you consider that they were all on the ice for the multiple 6v5 goals we scored, it looks a bit different.
Our worst year for that unit by far was 2021, when we lost Tavares and our best shooter was playing through a surgery-requiring wrist injury.
Our biggest PP struggles have also just coincidentally coincided with facing 3 of the best playoffs goaltenders of the past 3 years.
I think there are concerns - especially about the quality of our 2nd unit and the amount that we use them under this setup - and things we could try - even for the 1st unit that I think can get in their heads a bit on the PP when the goalie is locking it down and try too much to make "the play" - but there's also a lot of exaggerated hysteria about this without much consideration for what's going on beyond they all sux0rs blow it up.