KIRK
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 109,700
- 51,216
ZAR has no redeeming qualities..
I think you may be being unfair to people with no redeeming qualities.
ZAR has no redeeming qualities..
You need to get some glasses. Little shit kills almost every possession Sid and Jake work hard for. It gets old watching it. That line could flat out dominate if it wasn’t for him. He’s too weak to be effective out there against the other teams top pairingI do not understand people who thought Sheary was bad that period.
The Power Play is like London Buses - wait forever for one, then two come all at once.
Feel a little more comfortable about things but another goal would help a lot.
Lol what game are you people watching
This just confirms my thought that this board picks whipping boys and they'll never change their mind regardless of what that player does.
Sheary runs hot and cold.. he makes good plays, then high profile bad plays... its easy to focus on the latter, but literally if he isn’t scoring goals he is worthless in the spot he is in ... he definitely isn’t a defensive stalwart or physical presence...
This whole Sheary discussion sounds very similar to the whole Simon debate, where "Simon can't finish" is replaced with "Sheary falls over".
Sheary generates a boatload of chances and he'd be a 60 point player if he consistently finished them.
He does generate a lot of chances... but he do miss A LOT of them too.
Just like me playing soccer
Calm down Dick Tracy
Hard passWhat would it cost to get Gally on this team? 1st, Poulin, Legare, McCann?
He does generate a lot of chances... but he do miss A LOT of them too.
Just like me playing soccer
You don't pay that for Gallagher, as good as he is. History of major hand issues, I would be wearyWhat would it cost to get Gally on this team? 1st, Poulin, Legare, McCann?
What would it cost to get Gally on this team? 1st, Poulin, Legare, McCann?
It can be both a trip and an embellishment. He fell a full second after the stick was no where near him and after taking a full stable stride.I've seen the refs all embellishment for a lot less. Sheary's stick swung around and hit the Hab player around his waist and the Hab player "tripped over".
The ref made the call based on the score and based on the Pens about to get possession of the puck for another shot on net.
The mere fact that he generates a ton of chances shows that he's playing well, though.
It's like people who crapped on Sheary for missing that penalty shot. The fact that he drew the penalty shot shows he made a good play.
Those 2 penalties Montreal took were weak, as was Sheary's penalty, but I'm not arguing results. Keep being aggressive on net and beating down on our weak sauce third pairing.
You can do it I believe in your team.
Beating us right now is what's best for Montreal's future.
Ain't he a free agent soon?Counter offer?
Dat Geno pass
You don't pay that for Gallagher, as good as he is. History of major hand issues, I would be weary
I’d be a billionaire if I knew the lottery numbers in advance. Go back and rewatch the period and watch how many possessions he kills. Guy provides nothing any competent NHL player couldn’t provide. Between him, ZAR, and JJ, I don’t know who is worse at giving the puck to the other team.This whole Sheary discussion sounds very similar to the whole Simon debate, where "Simon can't finish" is replaced with "Sheary falls over".
Sheary generates a boatload of chances and he'd be a 60 point player if he consistently finished them.