Cornwallace
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2021
- 299
- 690
It also explains why the Bruins get all their players to sign team friendly contracts, they’re taking advantage of Massachusetts being an income tax free state.This explains why the Panthers have been a constant contender since entering the league!!
Not a free agent technically but Jeff Carter pouted his way out of Columbus so he could go party in Los Angeles.
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".
Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.
Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.
Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".
Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.
Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.
Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
You’re the one who said NJ is boring though. Look at a map. Newark is right next to NYC. Anyone playing for the Devils has access to the same stuff as anyone playing for the Rangers.
We feel the same about all of the New Yorkers who come to Jersey to use our beaches and malls for no taxes on clothes.Classic bridge and tunnel
Not sure if an employer could force it's employees to show them their taxes, but i could see it working with a more dynamic cap system like in the NFL where unused cap space rolls over to the next season giving team accountants some breathing room to do their job.
Honestly though it's a terrible and complicated idea that wouldn't bring in any additional revenue to the NHL and barely any entertainment value to the fans.
I wouldn't say so because I think it should be based on whichever is dominant and they get paid in whichever dollar that happens to be. Which is how it currently is.
Does this mean the floor would also be higher? Melnyk would be out for sureJust do like they do in Europe with soccer players. They sign a post-tax salary. ie: in France they always get a bigger gross salary because their income tax is the most brutal.
Having a salary cap that considers income tax would actually make the league more equal.
Does this mean the floor would also be higher? Melnyk would be out for sure
Talk about beating a deadhorse. You may actually want to try to calculate the actual monetary advantage teams have. Try researching it and putting numbers to it, don't forget the jock tax and how signing bonuses are taxed. Do this and come back to it rather than make a blanket claim that these teams have an advantage.Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".
Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.
Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.
Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
Because contrary to popular belief, it is about cost control for the league. Nothing to do with competitive balance. I know Bettman touted that when the cap started and everyone with a brain knew it was pure b.s. Players on the NY and California teams paying higher taxes does not change how much the owners are paying out.Curious, how come the caps aren't calculated off of Net income? Wouldn't this be a simple solution to this discrepancy?
Because contrary to popular belief, it is about cost control for the league. Nothing to do with competitive balance. I know Bettman touted that when the cap started and everyone with a brain knew it was pure b.s. Players on the NY and California teams paying higher taxes does not change how much the owners are paying out.
The drawback of the no state tax thing is that you have give much more NTC-s out, cause if a player takes less money because of no taxes, then he doesn't want to be traded to a place where he gets even less money.
If you think NHL players pay taxes the way most people on here do, you're a moron.
Base the players caphit after the take home pay as opposed to the total. It’s not perfect but it would help make it more fair.
You don’t even need to see their taxes, just look at what the take home pay would be after the income tax of that city.
That would mean, that almost every team would have a different salary cap.