Well, as I don't like Burke (and I mean hockey-hate in the most passionate sense of the word), building (or supervising) a team to be all grity and "beat Canada" is dumb Babcock said it best - "what if you don't MEET Canada" (i mean to be fair, in most tournaments Canada/USA are either in the same pool, or ultimately end up, but the point is valid - why build your team to beat 1 team. build your team to beat ANY team. you don't know whom you are going to face).
I'm trying to think who the best choice for the US would be coach wise. I am thinking Jon Cooper (because he's a dual if not American - but he's with team NAT). I don't see USA Brass hiring the new DET coach.. and I regret I don't know the nationalities of all 30 coaches) - but i mean. Paul Maurice is part of team Europe's coaching staff, so who knows whose allowed to coach, right?)
they were saying on the radio - you have Marchand + Getzlaf playing the role of Dubinsky.
who in the USA can beat that - so you have Dubinsky playing the role of Dubinsky. you can name several people to go ahead of Dubs, but if you want that skill-rugged edge who is better (legit question, i dunno). I wouldn't have named him to the team either.
you guys had some injuries (Kessel) and dumb mandates. so maybe by bowing out early, Burke/Lombardi can go away and then you can use Poile(was it Poile?) who built team USA for sochi who until you hit Canada was pretty darned good.