HF Reader
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2018
- 541
- 386
Thanks for this. Always interesting to read these different opinions.If you liked that you are going to love this Robinson: “Final” 2020 NHL Draft Rankings (June 2020)
Thanks for this. Always interesting to read these different opinions.If you liked that you are going to love this Robinson: “Final” 2020 NHL Draft Rankings (June 2020)
Byfield + Raymond or Rossi and its a Stanley cup within three years.
That's some pretty sexy edge work right there! Nice seeing him improve his skating
That's some pretty sexy edge work right there! Nice seeing him improve his skating
Edgework has never been the issue for Rossi. Ever since he entered the league, he has been one of the most slippery players down low in the league. He will be really good on the cycle at the NHL level given his edges and commitment to strength and balance. He is more inclined to turn back to the blueline and maintain possession with his back to the defender, than take him on 1 v 1 while facing him.
The issue for Rossi's skating is that his acceleration has always been good by OHL standards, but certainly not great for a small skilled pro, and he also lacks a top gear. It's why there is a question about his upside as a top line center, as there are not too many small centers with average speed who thrive. Once NHL defenders get the book that he won't beat them wide, will they collapse on him negating his favorite plays? Doubt they can shut him down, but might reduce his effectiveness.
That said, his edgework and strength are why he's a sure fire pro and likely will play in the NHL as soon as next year. Combined with his IQ, it's still a great package. He's a bit unique, so it will be interesting to see how he turns out.
The way I took it he just totally disregarded a players potential floor. So I can see why the picks are laid out that way.Maybe, but to be fair, he did say this before making his list:
"This is not intended to mock up what the selections will eventually be this… fall?. This is how I perceive the player today in conjunction with how I believe they will progress and develop. It’s projection over current product."
Which in retrospect is an odd excuse because the entire draft is generally based on how good the player will be later on, and not just now. Is this guy supposed to be a reliable opinion on the draft, has he ever been right in previous years? Does he really think Rossi and Holtz are going to be better than Stutzle?
I've found his skating to be consistantly underrated around here. I think he gets compared to other smaller star players who are typically burners and because he isn't that everything else gets overlooked. If he were 5'11 people would be talking about how great his edges are, how shifty he is, how great his lateral movement is, how strong he is on his skates, how hard he is to knock off stride and all that. Skating would be viewed as a strength not a flaw.I don't know if its just me but im always impressed by his acceleration. he consistently explodes for loose pucks and is first on them. he does it with the puck as well. slowing play down and lulling the opposition and out of nowhere exploding for a chance or for empty space. Very Alfie like.
I do agree his top speed still needs some work but with how hard he works im sure hes gonna get there.
Excellent point. Rossi will do everything he can to improve both his technique and his power...Anyway the game is not usually played at everyone going flat out. That extra gear helps in certain situations but if his straight line speed is good enough his edges and iq will get him the rest of the way. Rossi plays knowing what he's going to do next.. get open get the puck move it to an advantageous position and repeat.I don't know if its just me but im always impressed by his acceleration. he consistently explodes for loose pucks and is first on them. he does it with the puck as well. slowing play down and lulling the opposition and out of nowhere exploding for a chance or for empty space. Very Alfie like.
I do agree his top speed still needs some work but with how hard he works i'm sure hes gonna get there.
Not everyone is a fabulous skater. *most* prospects skating or accelerations is good by whatever the current standards are of whatever league their in. There are many prospects you can say “yeah their skating will be top tier in the NHL right now”. Only a select few have elite nhl skating. Rossi doesn’t. But i don’t think it will be a hinderance. Yes, are players his size usually a bit more speedy and hyper? Yes. But how many have been as talented as him? As smart? NotEdgework has never been the issue for Rossi. Ever since he entered the league, he has been one of the most slippery players down low in the league. He will be really good on the cycle at the NHL level given his edges and commitment to strength and balance. He is more inclined to turn back to the blueline and maintain possession with his back to the defender, than take him on 1 v 1 while facing him.
The issue for Rossi's skating is that his acceleration has always been good by OHL standards, but certainly not great for a small skilled pro, and he also lacks a top gear. It's why there is a question about his upside as a top line center, as there are not too many small centers with average speed who thrive. Once NHL defenders get the book that he won't beat them wide, will they collapse on him negating his favorite plays? Doubt they can shut him down, but might reduce his effectiveness.
That said, his edgework and strength are why he's a sure fire pro and likely will play in the NHL as soon as next year. Combined with his IQ, it's still a great package. He's a bit unique, so it will be interesting to see how he turns out.
It just something to criticize for people preferring someone else. He could take Foudy there if you want a skater.I've found his skating to be consistantly underrated around here. I think he gets compared to other smaller star players who are typically burners and because he isn't that everything else gets overlooked. If he were 5'11 people would be talking about how great his edges are, how shifty he is, how great his lateral movement is, how strong he is on his skates, how hard he is to knock off stride and all that. Skating would be viewed as a strength not a flaw.
For the Sens the only disadvantage is height. He plays a mature 2 way 3 zone game. He is a very strong offensive player with the skills they are looking for. He is arguably one of the most NHL ready prospects. He can win face offs and could add C depth at a minimum. I think he checks some boxes for them if they want a forward at 5. The 2 next best and top ranked forwards are Raymond and Perfetti that tower over Rossi by an inch or possibly less , according to elite prospects. So that will not be the reason to take one of them over Rossi.Not everyone is a fabulous skater. *most* prospects skating or accelerations is good by whatever the current standards are of whatever league their in. There are many prospects you can say “yeah their skating will be top tier in the NHL right now”. Only a select few have elite nhl skating. Rossi doesn’t. But i don’t think it will be a hinderance. Yes, are players his size usually a bit more speedy and hyper? Yes. But how many have been as talented as him? As smart? Not
Many. I mean this is the nhl. They like
Big. And we know some of them have rossi creeping into their top 5. Maybe even have him in their top 5.
Yeah I thought the same when I checked out their profiles. Like they’re not tall. And this whole “well their not close to their maturity yet they have more development room” I don’t buy that. It’s not “you see is what you get “ with rossi sure he’s already pretty strong. So what. There’s more to hockey than your strength. It’s not as if he comes in he gets 50 points next year and that’s it that’s all he will ever be. There are other things that a player can develop. Especially a smart player like rossi. It’s going to be very interesting to see what red wings do at 4.For the Sens the only disadvantage is height. He plays a mature 2 way 3 zone game. He is a very strong offensive player with the skills they are looking for. He is arguably one of the most NHL ready prospects. He can win face offs and could add C depth at a minimum. I think he checks some boxes for them if they want a forward at 5. The 2 next best and top ranked forwards are Raymond and Perfetti that tower over Rossi by an inch or possibly less , according to elite prospects. So that will not be the reason to take one of them over Rossi.
I will guarantee you Rossi won’t go 4th.Yeah I thought the same when I checked out their profiles. Like they’re not tall. And this whole “well their not close to their maturity yet they have more development room” I don’t buy that. It’s not “you see is what you get “ with rossi sure he’s already pretty strong. So what. There’s more to hockey than your strength. It’s not as if he comes in he gets 50 points next year and that’s it that’s all he will ever be. There are other things that a player can develop. Especially a smart player like rossi. It’s going to be very interesting to see what red wings do at 4.
You just ever know. Heck he may not even go fifth to us eitherI will guarantee you Rossi won’t go 4th.
I will guarantee you Rossi won’t go 4th.
Because we're taking him 3rd?I will guarantee you Rossi won’t go 4th.
Yeah I thought the same when I checked out their profiles. Like they’re not tall. And this whole “well their not close to their maturity yet they have more development room” I don’t buy that. It’s not “you see is what you get “ with rossi sure he’s already pretty strong. So what. There’s more to hockey than your strength. It’s not as if he comes in he gets 50 points next year and that’s it that’s all he will ever be. There are other things that a player can develop. Especially a smart player like rossi. It’s going to be very interesting to see what red wings do at 4.
Yeah but people will say he had that extra room to fill out. (Honestly I thiught point was terrible at the wjcs. Like I never would have guessed he would have became what he is).Brayden Point was 5'9 161 in his draft year
Brayden Point was 5'9 161 in his draft year
Yeah but people will say he had that extra room to fill out. (Honestly I thiught point was terrible at the wjcs. Like I never would have guessed he would have became what he is).
Seriously? He was incredible and had more chemistry with Mcdavid than anyone.Yeah but people will say he had that extra room to fill out. (Honestly I thiught point was terrible at the wjcs. Like I never would have guessed he would have became what he is).
Not to mention that many of the same things were said about both players in their draft profiles. Also not to mention that Brayden Point put up 91 pts in 72 Games in his draft year (1.26 pts /g) and Marco Rossi put up 120 in 56 (2.14 pts /g) thats very close to 1 pt/g difference. Also Rossi is over 20 lbs bigger than Point in their Draft years. So given that both were considered to have similar playing styles .. one clearly surpasses the other in size, strength and statistically to adequately justify a higher ranking.Not to mention Braydon Point was drafted in the 3rd round. It has never been a question of whether or not Rossi will be a good NHL player, but rather, is he worth the risk in the top 7ish picks or are there safer options between 4 and 7?
Braydon Point didn't set top 20 all time pts/g records for his age bracket in his league,Not to mention Braydon Point was drafted in the 3rd round. It has never been a question of whether or not Rossi will be a good NHL player, but rather, is he worth the risk in the top 7ish picks or are there safer options between 4 and 7?