molon labe
Registered User
Oh so a tax haven sunbelt team is getting another FA/trade target? Cue Bettman chiding us for saying these teams have an advantage. Let’s just pack sixteen teams in Florida and sixteen in Nevada and call it a day. Panama City Penguins lets go!
I love the favorable tax situation here and so too should anyone, really.
Objectively I think a way to curb what will increasingly gain popularity is to severely limit trade clauses and allow each team to have a single franchise tag which allows them to pay 1 player some under-the-cap situation (like what Toronto does with all their sponsorships for all the bellyaching they do about the taxes).
E.g.
- 3 trade clauses per team, period
- (and/or) trade clauses can only ever protect up to 75% of the league
+ One single player can earn up to 5M extra non-cap money. So a 97 could get paid 15, then an additional 5 but only count towards 15
Something in that realm which would permanently create situations where every team has something to offer these oft-times 25-30 year olds who are no longer JUST thinking about money but also where they want to cement themselves. Tampa would have none left but Utah might - and it would be something to give that player pause to think they could have trade protections and a life in Utah but a forever-volatile situation in Tampa.
Or somehow structure the league where everyone pays a small escrowed tax - though that would eventually hurt those same Canadian teams when the ownership / investor groups realize that each time they remove one of them from the equation the maths change substantially.


