Salary Cap: '24-'25 Salary Thread: Crosbicles Volume MMXXVI: Sid is Still Goat

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
He's a year older than Pickering. Fair to say a 22 year old defenseman isn't anywhere close to a finished product, but he already has dynamic offense.

Yeah and with Clarke, I just think you need him to be fine defensively, not anything amazing. If these guys pan out, I figure he'd be playing with Pickering long-term and Pickering would be the DFD for that pair. Would be similar to Pettersson-Karlsson in makeup, just a question of how talented the pair would be.

I have my doubts that Clarke becomes top pair caliber, but he does seem like a safe bet to be at least top-4 caliber. Their RD would be set up really nice for the long term with Clarke and Brunicke as 2 of their best young players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry
I, for one, look forward to reading the coping on how it’s actually a great deal that we got some team’s 7th 9th and 12th best prospects along with a cap dump and 3rd rounder for Rakell.
Jake's situation was pretty uniquely f***ed with reports all year about the guy intent on testing FA. /shrug

Pretty happy with what Dubas managed for a 2nd pairing guy in Petts and a borderline AHL loser in DOC. Maybe the Rakell trade is a pleasant surprise.

But there's definitely the worry that you're right. :laugh:
 
I, for one, look forward to reading the coping on how it’s actually a great deal that we got some team’s 7th 9th and 12th best prospects along with a cap dump and 3rd rounder for Rakell.
Or that keeping him is what was really best for the team because he’s producing and with the cap rising he’s signed for another year at a reasonable rate.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Big Friggin Dummy
Nah, it came out relatively early that there was zero interest in Eller.

We wanted him to be moved but I don't even remember anyone suggesting it.
Yep nobody wanted term for the next year. He wanted out.
Allegedly Dubas' ask for Rakell is a 1st / 2nd and Clarke.

View attachment 987158

From what I've heard LA wants Rakell bad.

Maybe Dubas pulls another rabbit out of his hat here ala Petts.

Clarke would get the same exact treatment as LA here though under Sullivan.
1st + Clarke for a 3rd + Rakell.

That was Slavin.

Nobody is denying Faber is good. You just said he was arguably the best American defenseman which isn't even close to true.

Slavin was definitely the best American on Ice for USA.

Sounds like two 1sts + for Gourde and Bjorkstrand.



If Dubas cannot cross the finish line on Rakell given what Bjorkstrand and Gourde just went for, this year is a complete clusterf***.

If Rakell isnt moved by Friday there will be an angry mob outside Dubas' house and understandably so lol. You need to sell everything you can in this market


We better be moving Rakell at the price Tampa just paid (obviously less but holy smokes)
 
Get Moore and Clarke for Rakell and I'd be pretty satisfied. Don't even need the pick there.
I don't watch enough LA to have an opinion on Moore. If he's a live guy that can be Bunting level or better sure. If he's empty salary I want more than just a good young player.
 
1st + Clarke, don't really care about Moore tbh. That dude's just a play and flip project imo, and I think that's destined for failure in this system and under this coach. The 1st and young player are the important parts, regardless of whether it's LA or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Magnifique 66
I don't watch enough LA to have an opinion on Moore. If he's a live guy that can be Bunting level or better sure. If he's empty salary I want more than just a good young player.

Yeah he's another Bunting caliber guy, I don't think he has massive value but Clarke is the big piece in that return.

If they have the cap to make it would, I'd be pretty good with just Clarke for Rakell straight up. Moore is mostly included just to replace Rakell.
 
Yeah he's another Bunting caliber guy, I don't think he has massive value but Clarke is the big piece in that return.

If they have the cap to make it would, I'd be pretty good with just Clarke for Rakell straight up. Moore is mostly included just to replace Rakell.
I don't want to be giving away cap space for nothing. We might not care about it, but if it makes life easier for the Kings to dump a guy then they need to pay for the service.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad