Hopefully this starts an arms race in the east. I can see Detroit, Toronto, Florida, and Ottawa as players for Rakell honestly.
Wait til he flips those picks for the most vanilla players in the game today.I'm genuinely shocked. Francis has been a total disaster there for the most part
He's a year older than Pickering. Fair to say a 22 year old defenseman isn't anywhere close to a finished product, but he already has dynamic offense.
Jake's situation was pretty uniquely f***ed with reports all year about the guy intent on testing FA. /shrugI, for one, look forward to reading the coping on how it’s actually a great deal that we got some team’s 7th 9th and 12th best prospects along with a cap dump and 3rd rounder for Rakell.
Or that keeping him is what was really best for the team because he’s producing and with the cap rising he’s signed for another year at a reasonable rate.I, for one, look forward to reading the coping on how it’s actually a great deal that we got some team’s 7th 9th and 12th best prospects along with a cap dump and 3rd rounder for Rakell.
Yep nobody wanted term for the next year. He wanted out.Nah, it came out relatively early that there was zero interest in Eller.
We wanted him to be moved but I don't even remember anyone suggesting it.
1st + Clarke for a 3rd + Rakell.Allegedly Dubas' ask for Rakell is a 1st / 2nd and Clarke.
View attachment 987158
From what I've heard LA wants Rakell bad.
Maybe Dubas pulls another rabbit out of his hat here ala Petts.
Clarke would get the same exact treatment as LA here though under Sullivan.
That was Slavin.
Nobody is denying Faber is good. You just said he was arguably the best American defenseman which isn't even close to true.
Sounds like two 1sts + for Gourde and Bjorkstrand.
If Dubas cannot cross the finish line on Rakell given what Bjorkstrand and Gourde just went for, this year is a complete clusterf***.
If Rakell isnt moved by Friday there will be an angry mob outside Dubas' house and understandably so lol. You need to sell everything you can in this market
There'll be top-six openings. You can pay him close to minimum, play him in the top-six and trade him at the next deadline for a pretty good pick.He's 29. There is no use for him.
If Seattle is getting 2 1sts for Gourde and Bjorkstrand then maybe Rakell for Clarke and a pick isn't totally insane. Here's hoping someone else decides to go all in.
I don't watch enough LA to have an opinion on Moore. If he's a live guy that can be Bunting level or better sure. If he's empty salary I want more than just a good young player.Get Moore and Clarke for Rakell and I'd be pretty satisfied. Don't even need the pick there.
I don't watch enough LA to have an opinion on Moore. If he's a live guy that can be Bunting level or better sure. If he's empty salary I want more than just a good young player.
How many eggs could we get with four first round picks?Inflation has hit player value hard lol
Those are two very late 1sts.
It's not that great, it's not giving up any top prospects or anything. You all are amazed at lame assets.
Not that Tampa has any of those to give anyways.
Trade Ricky, claim Vrana. I think he has the skills to be able to produce respectably next to Sid. Sign him to a cheap 1 year deal if he looks serviceable and flip him next year.
I don't want to be giving away cap space for nothing. We might not care about it, but if it makes life easier for the Kings to dump a guy then they need to pay for the service.Yeah he's another Bunting caliber guy, I don't think he has massive value but Clarke is the big piece in that return.
If they have the cap to make it would, I'd be pretty good with just Clarke for Rakell straight up. Moore is mostly included just to replace Rakell.
Rakell > Bjorkstrand but also should remember that centres are at a premium too and Gourde had a lot of value.