Dubas is doing precisely what he should be doing. Essentially letting this team self implode.They are creating a culture of acceptance at being mediocre.
They say performance matters, but it doesn’t.
Dubas is turning us into Buffalo.
Dubas is doing precisely what he should be doing. Essentially letting this team self implode.They are creating a culture of acceptance at being mediocre.
They say performance matters, but it doesn’t.
Dubas is turning us into Buffalo.
They are creating a culture of acceptance at being mediocre.
They say performance matters, but it doesn’t.
Dubas is turning us into Buffalo.
Sullivan has been doing this for years as a coach. Dubas is the Sullivan of GM's and President.
We know of the trifecta of mediocrity
Yea, but the East sucks bad this year and the powerplay is fixed. So why not actually be pro-active? Why does everything have to be some process? Being paralyzed by a process is stupid - if an opportunity presents itself, take it. I understand still wanting to sell of some older pieces, but there's no reason why this team can't be the 7 or 8 seed in the East this season either.I would like them to be a playoff team again soon. I never expected them to be one this year and I don't think Dubas planned for them to be a playoff team this year.
As I've said elsewhere, I think the idea was to regroup, make a few more trades, acquire a few more assets, and then be aggressive and be competitive next season.
If you can improve the team without giving up valuable assets, and if you can still focus on the proper development path for your young players, then sure.Yea, but the East sucks bad this year and the powerplay is fixed. So why not actually be pro-active? Why does everything have to be some process? Being paralyzed by a process is stupid - if an opportunity presents itself, take it. I understand still wanting to sell of some older pieces, but there's no reason why this team can't be the 7 or 8 seed in the East this season either.
What is the max we could possibly get for Rickie Raks at the deadline if he keeps producing?
His contract is a little much to where what he can bring back may be hampered but not at the way he’s producing currently.
If you can improve the team without giving up valuable assets, and if you can still focus on the proper development path for your young players, then sure.
That's why they did the Tomasino deal. Who knows what he'll turn out to be, but the move fulfilled two things: 1) It gave the Pens a young potential scoring option with pedigree, 2) It didn't cost much at all.
This team hasn't shown enough to warrant risking a player's development though. They could fire Jarry into the sun tomorrow and promote Blomqvist, but the team in front of him could just as easily implode and turn every game into a shooting gallery throughout the next few months. That won't help his long-term development.
Who developed Jarry again?
I keep forgetting.
HC MS - development guru.
Who did he develop? Besides Bryan Rust, epitome of Penguins hockey? Uh.....
Exactly what assets can we realistically acquire to make this joke of a roster competitive? And why bother when the maximum this "competitive team" can achieve would be making the playoffs and being annihilated?As I've said elsewhere, I think the idea was to regroup, make a few more trades, acquire a few more assets, and then be aggressive and be competitive next season.
that's a good thing; your health will be much better for it.Who developed Jarry again?
I keep forgetting.
Yes, super great penalty killer Acciari,Competitive teams with a bad PK should be interested in Acciari. Edmonton stands out in particular.
Yep lol…
Vanilla Nick Spaling not looking so bad any more.From Pensburgh article re stock up and down this season so far…the first two are obvious, but I guess there were so many “stock downs” they didn’t include Nieto lol…
Anthony Beauvillier — Over the last month, Beauvillier has one goal and no assists and his average ice time has slumped to just over 10 minutes per game (the lowest on the team among forwards in this stretch). He’s become a non-factor on a team with too many passengers.
Cody Glass — Similar to Beauvillier, Glass has been too vanilla this season. He doesn’t stand out, he doesn’t get to dangerous areas with the puck, he just doesn’t do much of anything. That’s resulted in no goals and two assists in the last 14 games this month, which for a player who has been bouncing between the second and third lines isn’t going to cut it.
Noel Acciari and his usage — Acciari is an easy target given the recency effect of giving away the game with his crucial turnover against Tampa, which he readily acknowledged afterwards. Acciari’s averaged almost 14 minutes of ice time in the last month, a lot of that is PK, which has also been struggling lately (eight goals against in the last seven games, to only a 55% success rate). It’s one thing for Acciari to be a lineup regular when the focused area and reasons he are in there are working, but it’s not working right now.
Look, Acciari is bad at a lot of things, but the Penguins are an average penalty kill team and he plays by far the most of any Penguins forward on the PK. I would rather trade for DOC if I was Edmonton because he's a better overall player and a cheaper cap hit, but let's not pretend Acciari is bad at something he's actually pretty good at.Yes, super great penalty killer Acciari,
View attachment 960321
We could have just resigned him for less than what we’re paying Ned…lol
This is what is a bit frustrating when it comes to Acciari. "He's PK's and tries hard!" Yeah, but he f***ing sucks at it. We talk about guys like Puljujarvi not being in and roster spots being limited because he "doesn't" PK but would his numbers be any worse than Acciari's if give the same time?Yes, super great penalty killer Acciari,
View attachment 960321
I would be inclined to agree but Blomqvist is posting a meager .905 sv% (ish) in the AHL at the moment. He might need a bit more seasoning. Larsson however, has been doing quite well. I would imagine if Jarry or Neds went down or got traded, Larsson would get the call and it would be Blomqvist and Murashov in the AHL.
DOC would be the far more attractive asset to trade for being that his cap hit is much lower and not having the extra year. But honestly, if I'm Dubas, I have BOTH on the block. DOC with a "let's talk" price tag and Acciari for a "clearance" level price.Look, Acciari is bad at a lot of things, but the Penguins are an average penalty kill team and he plays by far the most of any Penguins forward on the PK. I would rather trade for DOC if I was Edmonton because he's a better overall player and a cheaper cap hit, but let's not pretend Acciari is bad at something he's actually pretty good at.