Rebuild, in general, is a valid option, especially if we miss the playoffs. i.e., trade off some valuable pieces for high draft picks. But rebuilding through the draft is not a guaranteed path to success either. Drafting can be such a crapshoot. Bergeron and Krejci were 2nd and 3rd round picks who went on to be pillars of a successful franchise for years. Marchand, 3rd round.
Obviously if the consensus of the great hockey minds and scouts was that those three would be future pillars of a Cup-winning team and perennial contenders, they would have been ranked much higher. So, just pure luck?
On the other hand, we have a few former top-10 picks playing on the club currently, who have not exactly been carrying any franchises on their backs as one might expect:
E Lindholm, 5th overall. I mean, he's been good at times in his career, but spotty. Certainly not having the impact in Boston that his draft pedigree (and salary) would suggest.
Zaccha, 6th overall. H Lindholm, 6th overall - Again, both have had their moments, and have overall been good additions, but top-10-worthy?
Oliver "Where's Wahlly" Wahlstrom, 11th overall - Nuff said. Too soon? We'll see. Or we won't.
We also had #1 pick Taylor Hall. Good player, but has never been a franchise saviour.
So, should we trade pieces (McAvoy, Freddy, Marchand, etc) to get high draft picks for a rebuild? I suppose a better approach (is this stating the obvious?) is to target picks and prospects; try to get up-and-coming prospects for whom we have more data, use good ol' hockey sense to identify guys who have a good chance of developing into something special, and add a 1st round pick or two if possible. And then hope we get lucky.