xjoeyc23x
Registered User
- Apr 1, 2015
- 1,278
- 1,424
Kakko would have fit well in the top 6 here..... oh well
Rangers probably didn't want him with an East Coast team just incase.
Any chance the Bruins could get Stamkos at the trade deadline?
He’ll get an opportunity in Seattle for sure. I think he’s a 50-60 point player when the dust settles. Good move for the Kraken.Youve got to think Drury is being fired after the season. We have our complaints with Sweeney but man, Drury is pretty bad. Wonder if Kakko can finally come to fruition w/ Beniers and Wright. Woulda looked good with the Bs.
If they are going to fire him after two conference finals in three seasons then why does Sweeney still have a job after ten years?Youve got to think Drury is being fired after the season. We have our complaints with Sweeney but man, Drury is pretty bad. Wonder if Kakko can finally come to fruition w/ Beniers and Wright. Woulda looked good with the Bs.
Sabre’s have a whole lot of good young players I’d love the Bruins to be in on, but I don’t think any of them are in the position to pull a Taylor Hall unfortunately.Yeah that’s the issue I foresee with trading with the Rags and Sabres.
Really want in on the Sabres fire sale.
I would like to seeThe Wahlstrom addition gives the team some options for line construction, with a number of the forwards playing pretty well lately.
The top 6 has Zacha, Pastrnak, Marchand, E. Lindholm, Geekie, Coyle, Brazeau and Wahlstrom to choose from.
I don’t expect Johnson will be playing but they have the following options for the bottom 6. They include the two not selected for the top 6 plus Frederic, Kastelic, Koepke, Beecher and McLaughlin.
That's 12 forwards and a spare. Assuming no call ups from Providence how would you construct the lines?
The Wahlstrom addition gives the team some options for line construction, with a number of the forwards playing pretty well lately.
The top 6 has Zacha, Pastrnak, Marchand, E. Lindholm, Geekie, Coyle, Brazeau and Wahlstrom to choose from.
I don’t expect Johnson will be playing but they have the following options for the bottom 6. They include the two not selected for the top 6 plus Frederic, Kastelic, Koepke, Beecher and McLaughlin.
That's 12 forwards and a spare. Assuming no call ups from Providence how would you construct the lines?
I like it, and the whomever would be koepke those three were the Bruins best line in the early going. IMO they never should of been separatedI would like to see
Freddy Zacha Pasta
Marchand Lindholm Wahlstrom
MM-Coyle-Geekie
Beecher-Kastellic-whomever
Agreed, line 2 looked good with Coyle there, worth another look. Geekie is playing well lately too. He's got 5 goals and 8 points in his last 10 games. He's on pace for 18 goals now. I'd leave him on the top line until we see a drop.I turned the corner on Brazeau for a few weeks there but as the team has started to play with more pace he is looking slow again.
I’d be curious about keeping Coyle at that RW spot for a stretch. He has been…inconsistent at best…at driving play up the middle and they looked good last night.
??? Zacha Pasta
Marchand Lindholm Coyle
??? ??? ???
Beecher Kastelic Koepke
I know you said no callups, but man…the center spot sure has Poitras name on it.
Yeah, there's a 15 game stretch leading up to that break and 9 of them are WPG, VGK, FLA level teams, and 2 are against OTT who's battling us for a WC slot.Bruins schedule starts to get a wee bit harder here in a short while and then turning into the new Year heading to the 4 nations tournament on February 10, I’m not so sure this team as currently constructed is above 500 when they hit the break.