Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread VIII

JAD

Old School
Sponsor
Nov 19, 2009
3,264
4,531
Florida
Sweeney does not how to make adjustments to this roster, maybe he should go down to Washington and work......Chychrun, Managiapane, Varana, Dubois, Ellar, Roy, they all seem to be blending in quite well, and they have had the same amount of time as the Bruins new roster. Oh, and they have lost T.J. Oshie, no excuses there.
Sweeney needs to spend more time watching this mess than scouting for Canada's 4 nation tournament team.

A man cannot serve two masters.
 

Dicky113

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
4,522
3,477
Sweeney needs to spend more time watching this mess than scouting for Canada's 4 nation tournament team.

A man cannot serve two masters.
Sweeney needs to be fired into the f***ing sun. He might be the worst GM in the league when it comes to free agents and drafting. This is his mess, we need to get rid of him and start a rebuild with someone that doesn’t have their head up their ass. It’s starts the draft. Start unloading what you can for picks, and start fresh. It will never happen with that jackass in charge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: capecodder

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,209
19,013
North Andover, MA
Yeah God forbid a 9.5 million dollar "franchise" (snicker) defensemen should elevate his partners game. It's shouldn't matter if it's Lohrei, Zadorov or Lindholm. He should be able to adjust his game, considering he is "elite".

What of the elite D in the league right now have a shit partner?
1000%. There is no Bruin forward that off the rush even makes opposing D-men flinch. Pasta maybe when he's on but that is more finesse stickhandling than burning speed.

And what team trades away power forwards that can score anyways? Pretty rare commodity in today's NHL.

If Sweeney is limiting his search to only power forwards they have no chance and frankly only makes one question what the heck this front office is thinking.

I do think that come playoffs there are less rush chances and at the same time during the regular season it’s where most of the 5 on 5 goals from. You do need to sprinkle in some rush type players for the transition game, of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

RiverbottomChuck

Registered User
Jul 20, 2018
5,069
7,368
Washington DC
Last night on "What's Bruin" Dom's insights and gathered comments from another professional coach regarding the Bruins woes is probably more accurate than rumors of hurt feelings.
Other than that ... yeah training camp was a mess ... no one seamed ready for the season, players or coach.
What did the coach say about the B's woes?
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,398
24,435
What of the elite D in the league right now have a shit partner?


I do think that come playoffs there are less rush chances and at the same time during the regular season it’s where most of the 5 on 5 goals from. You do need to sprinkle in some rush type players for the transition game, of course.

You need a good mix. Guys who can gain the zone, push D back, shoot/score from range. And you need guys who crash the crease, score in tight, greasier goals. Although with the seemingly very fine line they are using for goalie interference now, I think that is swaying it a bit more towards scoring from range. Some of the goals being called back lately (league-wide) for minimal goalie interference is concerning for guys who make their living scoring while on top of the crease. Some more scoring from top offensive blue-line wouldn't hurt either. Opens up space in other areas. People poo-poo'd acquiring Chychrun last summer saying he wasn't needed but he would of been a much better add than Zadorov. Give you both a strong shooter AND a left-shot D for PP 1 (it really needs a left shot QB if the gameplan is Pasta one-tees). And without the long-term commitment.
 

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,873
27,782
Medfield, MA

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,340
18,849
Newton, MA.
Yep. If someone wants to point to one thing, one reason they're struggling, it's not the offense, the defense, the goaltending, the coaching... it's a lack of urgency, passion, give a shit.

The question is why.

Fairly or unfairly, taking player responsibility and management decisions into account, nearly every problem besetting the Bruins can be laid at Jim Montgomery's doorstep.
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,407
45,739
At the Cross
youtu.be
What of the elite D in the league right now have a shit partner?


I do think that come playoffs there are less rush chances and at the same time during the regular season it’s where most of the 5 on 5 goals from. You do need to sprinkle in some rush type players for the transition game, of course.
Who is his shit partner?

Cleary McAvoy is not the same player he was before his big contract. Three top 10 Norris finishes, inks the deal, last two seasons has 2 4th and 2 5th place votes combined.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,398
24,435
Yep. If someone wants to point to one thing, one reason they're struggling, it's not the offense, the defense, the goaltending, the coaching... it's a lack of urgency, passion, give a shit.

It's the lack of talent that means they have to work their asses off every game just to give themselves a chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Memokerobi

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,873
27,782
Medfield, MA
The question is why.

Fairly or unfairly, taking player responsibility and management decisions into account, nearly every problem besetting the Bruins can be laid at Jim Montgomery's doorstep.
Maybe they read HFBoards and have been convinced the regular season doesn't matter. :sarcasm:

I jest but... that's definitely a theory I'm considering. They had the best regular season in history and it didn't help them in the playoffs. The fans couldn't care less. So why should they? All they need to do is get in, and they don't even need to worry about that until Thanksgiving.

Another theory is the perfect storm. 3 of their 4 best players all had complicated off-seasons and are off to slow starts. Marchand's surgeries, Pasta's surgery, Swayman's hold out... Those guys elevate everyone around them but you could argue they've dragged people down at times this fall.

I'm not a big Monty guy, but I do think he's done things to try to get these guys going. He's chewed out Marchand. He benched Pasta. He's started Korpisalo over Swayman. He's demoted Coyle to the 4th line. He's played 4th liners in the top6 to embarrass the top6 into playing harder. He's changed lines and D pairs. He's tried to let lines and D pairs stay together. None of it seems to work. Which, may be why they need to fire him. At this point he seems like he's out of ideas and at a loss for how to get them to care enough to show up for 60 minutes a night every night.

Edit: I'll add that there's yet another theory that Swayman broke the culture with his holdout. I wasn't happy with Swayman's approach but that seems a bit unfair considering Pasta and McAvoy also held out. Still, they didn't claim to be holding out to set a new precedent for the goalie union and right or wrong, the players in that locker room may feel he put himself and/or the goalie union ahead of his team and teammates. That kind of animosity can be hard to hide in a closed loop like the locker room.
 
Last edited:

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,873
27,782
Medfield, MA
It's the lack of talent that means they have to work their asses off every game just to give themselves a chance.
It's the NHL, everybody has to work their asses off to have a chance.

They had similar talent last year and were one of the best teams in the league.

Last year they were willing to work for it. This year they haven't been.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grumpy Grizz

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,340
18,849
Newton, MA.
Maybe they read HFBoards and have been convinced the regular season doesn't matter. :sarcasm:

I jest but... that's definitely a theory I'm considering. They had the best regular season in history and it didn't help them in the playoffs. The fans couldn't care less. So why should they? All they need to do is get in, and they don't even need to worry about that until Thanksgiving.

Another theory is the perfect storm. 3 of their 4 best players all had complicated off-seasons and are off to slow starts. Marchand's surgeries, Pasta's surgery, Swayman's hold out... Those guys elevate everyone around them but you could argue they've dragged people down at times this fall.

I'm not a big Monty guy, but I do think he's done things to try to get these guys going. He's chewed out Marchand. He benched Pasta. He's started Korpisalo over Swayman. He's demoted Coyle to the 4th line. He's played 4th liners in the top6 to embarrass the top6 into playing harder. He's changed lines and D pairs. He's tried to let lines and D pairs stay together. None of it seems to work. Which, may be why they need to fire him. At this point he seems like he's out of ideas and at a loss for how to get them to care enough to show up for 60 minutes a night every night.
Great post.

I would only quibble with the line changing. He rarely lets a line gel.

As I say to anyone who will listen, he changes them like a bodily function. Players can't get used to each other because they're always playing on another line two seconds later. I exaggerate, but I think you understand what I'm saying.

Also, he is not a competent defensive head coach. Not at present and not in the NHL.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,398
24,435
It's the NHL, everybody has to work their asses off to have a chance.

They had similar talent last year and were one of the best teams in the league.

Last year they were willing to work for it. This year they haven't been.

There isn't a team in hockey history that worked it's asses off all 82 games. Just not realistic.

You say they lack passion, well they are 3rd in hits and among the more frequent fighting teams.

Want to know a good way to demoralize a group of hockey players? Build a bad hockey team. Players are all students of the game, they know when as a group they just aren't good enough to win consistently. They won't say it to the media, and drop buzzwords like urgency. But deep down the players know what Sweeney and Neely has assembled this year just won't cut it.

Let's be honest about last year's team. They made a lot of hey when the sun shined in the first half of the season. It was far from one of the best teams in the 2nd half.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,586
22,081
Tyler, TX
Swayman's even strength save percent is 34th. Worse than every starter and a couple backups. Korpisalo is 22nd with the same defense. Link

Yes, team defense has been bad, but no way should Korpisalo be ahead of Swayman across the board in every category. Swayman has not been good enough. Not by a mile. Team defense, team offense also not good enough, but Swayman shouldn't be getting a free pass.
The only problem I have with using save percentage is that all shots are equal in that calculation. On a defensive trainwreck like the Bruins, the shots are of a higher quality than allowed by a strong defending team. Has Swayman been great? No, but I think hes been okay. If he was playing this way behind a team that can defend well and spend more time in the offensive zone, his numbers would look acceptable I believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,209
19,013
North Andover, MA
You need a good mix. Guys who can gain the zone, push D back, shoot/score from range. And you need guys who crash the crease, score in tight, greasier goals. Although with the seemingly very fine line they are using for goalie interference now, I think that is swaying it a bit more towards scoring from range. Some of the goals being called back lately (league-wide) for minimal goalie interference is concerning for guys who make their living scoring while on top of the crease. Some more scoring from top offensive blue-line wouldn't hurt either. Opens up space in other areas. People poo-poo'd acquiring Chychrun last summer saying he wasn't needed but he would of been a much better add than Zadorov. Give you both a strong shooter AND a left-shot D for PP 1 (it really needs a left shot QB if the gameplan is Pasta one-tees). And without the long-term commitment.

Yeah I think a nuance here is that this team needs more guys who can score beyond 8 feet. I don’t care if it’s a big bruising cycle guy or a rush guy or someone that wears purple lipstick. It’s very hard for all but a select few on this team to score more than dirty goals. And dirty goals is good! But as you say, balance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad