Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread VII

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
76,301
97,593
HF retirement home

RALEIGH, N.C. — When the battles were over Thursday night, the battle cries were the same: Time to stick together.
On the heels of an 8-2 shellacking at the hands of the Hurricanes, the Bruins locker room at the newly renamed Lenovo Center was quiet. Confidence, however, still hung in the air.
Confidence that the recent skid the team has been on — dropping five of six games — can be halted with work. Teamwork, to be exact.
“Well, we’re going to get out of it together. That’s the only way,” said David Pastrnak, who assisted on both Boston goals. “Again, tightening up as a group together and finding a way to win games against the good teams.
“And that’s how sometimes you get to know each other, know what to expect, and we just need to get on a winning streak and compete. Compete level needs to be way higher. Details. That’s going to get us out of there.”

They couldn’t match up with Carolina and were forced into illegalities — three high sticking and two interference penalties — to try to staunch the bleeding. That almost always backfires, and it did against Rod Brind’Amour’s club, which scored three demoralizing power-play goals.

As of Friday, the Bruins led the NHL with 134 penalty minutes.

“Definitely move our feet,” said Pastrnak, when asked how the Bruins can stay out of the penalty box. “There’s a lot of stick penalties, high sticking, so that’s one. But honestly, this game, we just weren’t good enough five-on-five at all. They were all over us and we’ve got to be better.”

When a team is forced to spend an exorbitant amount of time killing penalties, it can’t establish a flow, and in the Bruins’ case, it has their most creative offensive player — Pastrnak — spending too much time watching and not enough time skating.

The Bruins, perennially among the league’s elite penalty-killing teams, are squashing opponents on the man-advantage at just a 76 percent clip.

Coach Jim Montgomery gave his lines a complete makeover for the Carolina game, but because of special teams situations, none of them was able to form chemistry or generate chances.

Tinkering with lines is usually done to generate a spark. It also can have the opposite effect, though Bruins players dismissed the notion that the juggling has hurt their confidence.

“I mean, Monty [is] just starting to get us going, so obviously it didn’t work,” said Pastrnak. “So, the mixing lines needs to happen. So personally, I have no problem with it. I can read off anybody.

“It’s just like I said, right now, it’s not about a combination. We are not good enough as a team, and that’s where it starts.”

Trent Frederic concurred.

“I think we’re used to it,” he said. “I think that’s kind of something they’ve done for whatever this is three years now with Monty. I don’t think it’s anything too crazy. I don’t think that’s the reason or anything like that. I think it just comes down to individuals and playing as a team.”

Under Montgomery, the Bruins got off to excellent starts the last two seasons, so this uninspired beginning is uncharted territory.

Montgomery said it’s not a case of guys just waiting for the magic to happen.

“I look at it a little differently,” he said. “We had a lot of success the last two years and we’re first place in the league at Thanksgiving the last two years. We never achieved anything we wanted to do.

“Right now, we’re not happy. Nobody’s happy with what’s going on, but we will get out of it, and we will be better, and hopefully it creates a better result come playoff time.”

Pastrnak preached patience as well

“It’s definitely something new,” he said. “Usually we have good starts, but honestly, it’s very early. So, it’s good.

“We need to get together, tighten up, learn, and the only way we’re going to get out of there is together and to compete. So, we have two games in two days. That’s a perfect way to get back on the winning track.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreghorn2

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
9,213
9,838
Moncton NB
Lindholm has been the biggest disappointment for me so far . I never notice him playing half the time . Hes invisible.
He was the same way with Vancouver after they traded for him and they were trying to move him at the TDL, he did however play well in the playoffs. I think he is a little over paid and is more a #2 center. They need a real #1 C someone like MacKinnon, Eichel, Barkov, Aho etc. To get a #1C, they would need to move someone like Swayman or McAvoy or Pastrnak. E.Lindholm though may get you a top 6 winger?
 

mar2kbos

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
7,136
8,233
Pasta NMC
McAvoy NMC
Lindholm NMC
Lindholm NMC
Zadorov NMC
Marchand (Outstanding Service Clause)

Zacha 10 team NTC
Carlo 10 team NTC
Coyle 8 team NTC
Swayman No restrictions for 2 years
Too many players with comfort. These guys are playing for a check and know that even when they are bad they have the comfort of a controlled contract to fall back on.

This is why the coach will be the sacrificial lamb. It’s the easiest to pull off. This weekend I think could spell the end of his tenure if they lose both. One win will extend him for a bit
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,311
4,651
He was the same way with Vancouver after they traded for him and they were trying to move him at the TDL, he did however play well in the playoffs. I think he is a little over paid and is more a #2 center. They need a real #1 C someone like MacKinnon, Eichel, Barkov, Aho etc. To get a #1C, they would need to move someone like Swayman or McAvoy or Pastrnak. E.Lindholm though may get you a top 6 winger?
Now you are stuck with this guy for 7 years, just an awful signing. They would have been better off showing patience and signing a wing that can put the puck in the net, at Lindholms price you might have been able to sign another wing. Then when a top line center came along go for it.
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,216
21,833
Maine
Lindholm has been the biggest disappointment for me so far . I never notice him playing half the time . Hes invisible.

E. Lindholm hasn't clicked well with his linemates yet but I do think his overall game is solid. He's sneakily one of the more physical guys they have - he's caught more than a few guys with surprisingly hard body checks. I didn't know he had that in him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigGoalBrad

BigGoalBrad

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
10,669
3,364
Now you are stuck with this guy for 7 years, just an awful signing. They would have been better off showing patience and signing a wing that can put the puck in the net, at Lindholms price you might have been able to sign another wing. Then when a top line center came along go for it.
Nah at worst he's a Coyle upgrade.

We just need to get rid of Coyle. Thank him for a few good years and let him cash his checks and mail it in elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,765
27,313
Medfield, MA
Thoughts on Coyle for Bertuzzi?

We know Bert can play with Pasta so we get a 1st line again. I love Bertuzzi's compete level in the playoffs the last 2 years. Similar money, but Bert is signed for 4 years vs Coyle's 2.

Nick Foligno is currently Chicago's 2nd line center so they get an upgrade at C and they can reunite Hall and Coyle who also have chemistry. Heck, they can ice Hall-Coyle-Smith which was a good line for us a few years ago.

(Fwiw, I'm not a Coyle hater, just trying to figure out a deal we could afford that would move the needle.)
 
  • Love
Reactions: wintersej

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,311
4,651
Thoughts on Coyle for Bertuzzi?

We know Bert can play with Pasta so we get a 1st line again. I love Bertuzzi's compete level in the playoffs the last 2 years. Similar money, but Bert is signed for 4 years vs Coyle's 2.

Nick Foligno is currently Chicago's 2nd line center so they get an upgrade at C and they can reunite Hall and Coyle who also have chemistry. Heck, they can ice Hall-Coyle-Smith which was a good line for us a few years ago.
Big pass
 

JAD

Old School
Sponsor
Nov 19, 2009
3,161
4,282
Florida
I keep looking at the roster / lineup and keep wondering - who on this team other than Pastrnak is capable of scoring a goal more often than once every 5 games if that?
Who is going to step up?
It doesn't look good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

RoccoF14

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 1, 2016
6,250
9,534
Chicago, IL
Thoughts on Coyle for Bertuzzi?

We know Bert can play with Pasta so we get a 1st line again. I love Bertuzzi's compete level in the playoffs the last 2 years. Similar money, but Bert is signed for 4 years vs Coyle's 2.

Nick Foligno is currently Chicago's 2nd line center so they get an upgrade at C and they can reunite Hall and Coyle who also have chemistry. Heck, they can ice Hall-Coyle-Smith which was a good line for us a few years ago.

(Fwiw, I'm not a Coyle hater, just trying to figure out a deal we could afford that would move the needle.)
If I'm Chicago, I'm interested in that deal. Who slots in at Center for us?

To be honest though, if I'm making a trade for forward help, I'd be looking at moving one of our defensemen, not creating a hole to fill a hole at forward. I think Lohrei, McAvoy, Lindholm and Carlo all have value. I get that most are gonna be tough to move due to contract restrictions, but that's the one area where I think we have some depth and some trade value.

....I'm not a Coyle hater either, btw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayMakers

Mr. Make-Believe

The happy genius of my household
Thoughts on Coyle for Bertuzzi?

We know Bert can play with Pasta so we get a 1st line again. I love Bertuzzi's compete level in the playoffs the last 2 years. Similar money, but Bert is signed for 4 years vs Coyle's 2.

Nick Foligno is currently Chicago's 2nd line center so they get an upgrade at C and they can reunite Hall and Coyle who also have chemistry. Heck, they can ice Hall-Coyle-Smith which was a good line for us a few years ago.

(Fwiw, I'm not a Coyle hater, just trying to figure out a deal we could afford that would move the needle.)
Love it
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayMakers

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,765
27,313
Medfield, MA
If I'm Chicago, I'm interested in that deal. Who slots in at Center for us?

To be honest though, if I'm making a trade for forward help, I'd be looking at moving one of our defensemen, not creating a hole to fill a hole at forward. I think Lohrei, McAvoy, Lindholm and Carlo all have value. I get that most are gonna be tough to move due to contract restrictions, but that's the one area where I think we have some depth and some trade value.

....I'm not a Coyle hater either, btw.
Lindholm, Zacha, Poitras, Kastelic... Frederic and Geekie can both play C, wouldn't be afraid of moving Kastelic to 3c either (and Beecher to 4c).

They do have numbers on D. Every time Wotherspoon plays he looks like he should be an every day player. I'd be nervous about creating a hole there too though. Lohrei, Wotherspoon and Peeke are all probably best suited to 3rd pair right now... So if you take out a top4 guy (let's say Carlo) you're going to create a top4 hole.

Maybe you could flip Lohrei for a forward of similar age and upside and not lose anything defensively. High risk move, and probably hard to find a forward who's similarly promising that another team would be willing to move, but if you could that might make sense since the left side of the top4 is locked up for years and have NMC's.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad