Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
26,318
29,238
Medfield, MA
98.5 just reported the cred guy in Columbus has Sweenuios on the list. Playing Winny. Who would they be looking at?
It took me a minute to figure out what you were saying...

Ehlers is one of the highest profile UFA's on the board this summer. I believe rumors are that he does not want to re-sign with Winnipeg. Niederreiter and Namestnikov are also UFA's in Winterpeg. Sweeney loves to trade for UFA's he wants to sign.

With both team ahead of the Bruins in the standings it would have to be a hockey trade that makes both sides better.
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,797
5,232
Coyle only has an 8-team NTC, he no doubt will put most of the Canadian teams on it and probably San Jose and Anaheim, he could be moved. Nashville may be looking to shake things up, I would see of they agree to Coyle + Geekie + Merkulov for O'Reilly + Evangelista.
I would rather move Lindholm with that shitty contract, but we all know that is not happening.
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,797
5,232
You are probably right, maybe both, who knows,......Who paid for the plane Jeremy or team USA.?
 

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
9,318
10,041
Moncton NB
I would rather move Lindholm with that shitty contract, but we all know that is not happening.
I think Coyle is the one they could be shopping along with Geekie. LIndholm just signed, so to move him they would have to be getting a real good player back, they could spin it that they could not refuse the deal, otherwise they won't move him this year. Vancouver though tried to trade him last year not long after acquiring him from Calgary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CellyHard

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,797
5,232
I think Coyle is the one they could be shopping along with Geekie. LIndholm just signed, so to move him they would have to be getting a real good player back, they could spin it that they could not refuse the deal, otherwise they won't move him this year. Vancouver though tried to trade him last year not long after acquiring him from Calgary.
You are no doubt right, that was my wishful thinking, taking over reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
9,318
10,041
Moncton NB
You are no doubt right, that was my wishful thinking, taking over reality.
I would love to deal him for someone like Necas and then make another deal for a top C, even if that means dealing a Marchand or even Pasta if that gets you a true #1 under 30 Center.
 

4ORRBRUIN

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 27, 2005
24,058
19,120
boston
True, but to be honest, I am not looking to trade him, but with his contract and if continues to play like this, it should be explored and considered.
Why would anyone want him if this was the case? I'm not worry about McAvoy he will come around,

Not many tradable pieces on this team that will fetch a better player coming this way.
 

Absurdity

light switch connoisseur
Jul 6, 2012
11,611
8,427
If the Bruins want to move someone to make a statement, I look at Frederic, Geekie, or Coyle.

If the Bruins end up sellers, that list gets bigger, but if they are trying to salvage this season, those are the three I would look at moving if I was Sweeney.
 

4ORRBRUIN

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 27, 2005
24,058
19,120
boston
If the Bruins want to move someone to make a statement, I look at Frederic, Geekie, or Coyle.

If the Bruins end up sellers, that list gets bigger, but if they are trying to salvage this season, those are the three I would look at moving if I was Sweeney.
Coyle you would need to add a prospect with that contract. No ones touching him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenian24

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
26,596
23,496
It took me a minute to figure out what you were saying...

Ehlers is one of the highest profile UFA's on the board this summer. I believe rumors are that he does not want to re-sign with Winnipeg. Niederreiter and Namestnikov are also UFA's in Winterpeg. Sweeney loves to trade for UFA's he wants to sign.

With both team ahead of the Bruins in the standings it would have to be a hockey trade that makes both sides better.

Does H. Lindholm have any trade protection?
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,503
22,730
Maine
Would you McAvoy ?

Bruins have no potential #1 dman in the system if McAvoy is traded. While McAvoy has had his issues ( TBH, last year was inconsistent too ), he would leave a massive hole behind with nobody to fill those shoes. I think the right play to make is let McAvoy work thru his issues - sometimes, good players have down year(s) before they revert back to the player they were. I think it's very premature to start talking about trading McAvoy.
 

Caper Bruins fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 4, 2011
10,216
6,102
Cape Breton
I think Coyle is the one they could be shopping along with Geekie. LIndholm just signed, so to move him they would have to be getting a real good player back, they could spin it that they could not refuse the deal, otherwise they won't move him this year. Vancouver though tried to trade him last year not long after acquiring him from Calgary.
Lindholm has been the biggest disappointment for me so far . I never notice him playing half the time . Hes invisible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kegs and bbfan419

Absurdity

light switch connoisseur
Jul 6, 2012
11,611
8,427
Coyle you would need to add a prospect with that contract. No ones touching him.
I agree, with him it's more of an offseason move where he hopefully is decent the rest of the year and not a super negative asset. His contract is more attractive with 1 more year left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4ORRBRUIN

RoccoF14

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 1, 2016
6,547
10,131
Chicago, IL
Pasta NMC
McAvoy NMC
Lindholm NMC
Lindholm NMC
Zadorov NMC
Marchand (Outstanding Service Clause)

Zacha 10 team NTC
Carlo 10 team NTC
Coyle 8 team NTC
Swayman No restrictions for 2 years
When I read this post and saw that Zadorov had a NMC, I literally spit my bourbon on my keyboard. I had no idea.

Who gives a NMC to a guy who's played on 6 different teams over the past 10yrs? Seriously?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

dugg133

Registered User
Jan 11, 2023
1,625
4,071
Coyle you would need to add a prospect with that contract. No ones touching him.
I don't really agree with this. I think some teams would bite on a 2-way center that had 60 points last season for less then 6mil AAV. Especially teams with weak center depth.

But I think we're a ways off from this being a real conversation, they aren't moving anyone right now. Firing Monty will be the first domino to fall, if they do that and still suck then maybe a move happens.
 

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
76,899
99,936
HF retirement home

Gotta hand it to the Bruins, they’re bad right now, and for a reason, in fact for many reasons.

All of which point to no one but themselves and, to put a finer point on it, some month-long atrocious performances from key individuals fitted far too comfortably behind those Spoked-B sweaters. Topping the list of the culpable, in no particular order: Charlie Coyle, Charlie McAvoy, Jeremy Swayman, and Nikita Zadorov.

For those keeping track of the dollars, those Failing Four haul down a collective $28 million per season, roughly one-third of the payroll.

Much is expected of those four. As go the best players, so goes a team. Thus far, they have been the oversized cement shoes dragging the Bruins to a 4-6-1 start. The Bruins stand but 2 points better than the Blackhawks, who on Friday morning owned the No. 32 spot in the standings.

The Bruins, 2 points from dead last in the Original 32. Are we being entertained?

Sure, Montgomery could be canned, and let us not forget, the third-year Bruins coach is carrying the history of two failed postseason runs. He needs to be better, find answers, and right now it’s obvious he doesn’t have any.

If he can, Montgomery needs to tap into some mojo soon. However, it’s clear, a month into the season, the front office handed him a roster stocked with far too much AHL talent, most notably among the low-temp, low-producing forwards.

A priority right now should be to sign Tyler Johnson out of his PTO. He’s not a cure-all for the forward group, but a simple Band-Aid would stem some of the bleed-out.

It’s also painfully obvious that the aforementioned key/core players have, for whatever reasons, submitted performances worthy of being on that make-believe shuttle down Route 95 to AHL Providence. Such wakeup calls no longer exist in the NHL.

By virtue of cap restrictions and negotiated contract perks, most veterans belong to a protected class, shielded from demotion and typically not able to be traded. It’s only pride and a coach’s willingness to restrict ice time that truly can motivate them.

As for those failing individual performances:

▪ Swayman. The true definition of an elite No. 1 stopper is … ? While numbers are important, the finer print comes down to whether he makes big, timely saves. We’re not seeing that from Swayman, now four weeks into his Franchise Stopper tenure.

Swayman was hardly the lone issue against the Hurricanes, but after Brad Marchand’s goal erased the early 1-0 deficit, they needed him to go Full Hasek on at least one of the shots that delivered three Carolina goals across 52 seconds by Andrei Svechnikov, Jackson Blake, and Martin Necas.

▪ McAvoy. The franchise defenseman opened the season by tallying five shots and two goals across the first two games. Looked like a new, bolder CM73. But here we are again, and the No. 1 point option on the power play has but 16 shots on net through 11 games.

That shot total ranked McAvoy T-48 among NHL backliners, including ex-Bruin Colin Miller, as of Friday morning. Miller normally skates third pairing for the Jets and averages 13:57 in ice time, compared with McAvoy’s 23:21. Miller also has a line of 2-3—5, not one of those points collected on the power play. Mercy.

Your point man has to shoot. Repeat, your point man HAS to shoot. Witness current shot totals for the top four point men: Roman Josi, 45; Dougie Hamilton, 44; Quinn Hughes, 34; Brandon Montour, 33.

▪ Coyle. Performed admirably last season, moving into top-six center role. Won 51.6 percent of his faceoffs, helped drive lines.

Thus far, he’s missing in action. Coyle has been hammered at the dot (42.3 percent) and his minus-9 is tied with Trent Frederic for worst in Black-and-Gold show. His goal at Colorado Oct. 16 stands as his lone point for the season. Montgomery has been trigger-happy with mixing and matching centers and wingers; that hasn’t helped.

The place to begin a Coyle do-over would be his comfort spot, No. 3 center, and perhaps go with sophomore Matt Poitras as No. 2 pivot for 10-14 days, if he can bear the physical load. For the moment, Coyle is lost in space.

▪ Zadorov. The 6-foot-6-inch New Z piled up penalty minutes out of the gate (at least two in each of the first seven games), and he at least has jumped off the express train to the sin bin. Super.
Signed for five years/$30 million in July, the towering Russian was hired on to help apply a crusty veneer on a skilled, oft-soft backline. Thus far, he has displayed not nearly enough sandpaper, and his quick-decision game has been wanting.

He desperately needs to find a groove, deliver on his job definition, all perhaps to fall into place if he started landing some crushing “statement” hits. Those big bangs would be the equivalent of a No. 1 stopper making, say, a big timely save.

He has 32 hits, proof that he can land them, but he needs to launch a body or two to Palookaville as a way of getting the attention of opponents, and more important, the faith and confidence of his teammates.

Because what’s most obvious of all right now, everyone in those Black-and-Gold unis is in need of a wakeup call.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad