Have the Bruins already found a winning trio on revamped 4th line?
The Bruins' new-look fourth line of Mark Kastelic, Cole Koepke, and Johnny Beecher dominated in limited reps on Thursday.
www.boston.com
Also - have we underestimated Kastelic, small sample size notwithstanding?
What if we get a “3rd line that could be a second line on some mediocre teams.”It’s will all be fine except against the most elite teams. Until you look at that 2nd line and think “that could be a first line on a mediocre team”, the Bruins are in the second group of contenders.
Fourth line has been great both games. First line is very good and I really like what should be a good mix of size and skill with 11-51-55. Geekie is the glaring hole at forward, need an upgrade there badly.I want to see them stick with that 4th line. It's fantastic so far.
What if we get a “3rd line that could be a second line on some mediocre teams.”
Fourth line has been great both games. First line is very good and I really like what should be a good mix of size and skill with 11-51-55. Geekie is the glaring hole at forward, need an upgrade there badly.
Maybe Lohrei or Carlo and a prospect get them a legit 25 goal scorer with some jam.
I agree he does have potential to be a good bottom 6 forward, but Johnson is a vet that does have a bit of a scoring touch and would be a good addition, especially on the PP.Not ready to give up on Jones,way to early
If the Sabres fall out of the race, wonder if they would deal Alex Tuch? I know he is a local Buffalo guy, but he could be a good add and his salary is not that bad.Fourth line has been great both games. First line is very good and I really like what should be a good mix of size and skill with 11-51-55. Geekie is the glaring hole at forward, need an upgrade there badly.
Maybe Lohrei or Carlo and a prospect get them a legit 25 goal scorer with some jam.
run withWhat if we get a “3rd line that could be a second line on some mediocre teams.”
Zacha - Poitras - Pastrnak
Marchand - Lindholm - Geekie
Frederic - Coyle - Brazeau
Beecher - Kastelic - Koepke
Seven preseason games and I don't think we got a single look of Lysell + Poitras. Not that I think Lysell is completely ready but it would be nice to know if there's something there
He didn’t earn it.Seven preseason games and I don't think we got a single look of Lysell + Poitras. Not that I think Lysell is completely ready but it would be nice to know if there's something there
He earned it by having a good season in Providence. Preseason is free ice, might as well try different looks rather than staple him to Patrick Brown.He didn’t earn it.
Poitras is clearly on another level. Poitras is a gem. Another example of Sweeneys horrible drafting ability.
18-28-88 isn’t working either, sorry to say. They were on the ice for 1 shot attempt for, 11 against.run with
18-28-88
63-51-55
11-13-39
18-28-88 isn’t working either, sorry to say. They were on the ice for 1 shot attempt for, 11 against.
I wouldn't mind Trent Poitras Pasta
They paid big money to get Lindholm to play with Pasta, and first line has produced 6 goals in 3 games, I don't see them breaking them up quickly
The production isn’t there but it’s 3 games. You can see the chemistry a bit though.Where are you getting 6 goals?
They've been on the ice for 2 even strength goals (both against MTL) and the Montreal game notwithstanding, shot attempts are 8 for, 22 against and their xG% is 34.5.
I don't see them getting broken up quickly either but I'm also not seeing the chemistry we were hoping for.