Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
31,474
21,073
Connecticut
The NHL loves Cap friendly being gone, Bettman said years ago that he does not think fans care about salaries, etc and just want to watch the games. Bettman does not want any of the "inner workings" of the game available to the fans, just spend your money and shut up.

Should make for more outrageous trade proposals now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kegs

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,576
4,959
sure did, forgot about the Pasta/Willie friendship too
I am coming full circle, let's give Lysell, a legitimate look and find out if he is ready, I also would agree Nylander and also Vrana, tight to the cap should be worth a look.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,576
4,959
Im going to miss CapFriendly. But at least there is Puckapedia. Better than nothing.
I am with you, it was good for someone like me to try and make some sense, but then again such a great game that shoots itself in the foot again and again, well at least so-called leadership does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenian24

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,824
19,332
Connecticut
In terms of Brazeau it really depends on where he plays. If he ends up down on the 4th line then 12-15 goals is great. If he is up on the second line than it is a problem

If Brazeau is playing on the 2nd line than 1 of 2 things have happened:

1. He's playing/producing like a 2nd line player and has earned the spot
2. The team has a ton of injuries and Brazeau is the best option available that's healthy
 
  • Like
Reactions: sarge88

Bruins4Lifer

Registered User
Jun 28, 2006
8,945
1,033
Regina, SK
If Brazeau is playing on the 2nd line than 1 of 2 things have happened:

1. He's playing/producing like a 2nd line player and has earned the spot
2. The team has a ton of injuries and Brazeau is the best option available that's healthy
Or

3. Lysell didn't show enough in camp to earn a roster spot, and they like the chemistry of a line of Freddy-Poitras-Geekie enough to not break it up.
 

Fenian24

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 14, 2010
11,040
15,499
I still like Sprong and Johnson on PTO's, both bring a different skill set to the team that we are missing.
I cannot see Sprong coming in to anybody's camp on a PTO. I am sure he has had offers but probably nothing high enough yet or he is a major distraction off the ice and in the room and no one wants him. He is a decent player and could help.

Can't see Sweeney doing anything until Swayman is signed, nor should he.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sarge88 and lopey

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,576
4,959
Or

3. Lysell didn't show enough in camp to earn a roster spot, and they like the chemistry of a line of Freddy-Poitras-Geekie enough to not break it up.
Well this is another year, lets see what he is made of, decision time for some of these prospects, if not good enough, time to move on from them, use them to add to a trade package or recoup picks.
 

Number8

Registered User
Oct 31, 2007
18,892
19,421
Meanwhile here at the world's largest online hockey community 90% of the discussion is about trades/signings/contracts/etc.

If the marketing geniuses at the NHL head office had any brains at all, the NHL should of bought Cap Friendly themselves and monetized it. What's that, you like using Armchair GM and Buy-out calculators all day? OK, that'll be $1.99 per month. You just want to view, make that tier free. Make it proprietary and shut down the competitors like Puck-Pedia, it's your own data FFS.

Use it to advertise your own product, I wager to guess Cap Friendly probably gets more clicks and views per day than NHL.com does. This should of been a lay-up instead NHL drops the ball. Again.
They have NHL NTF’s to sell. That’s where the big money lies.

“Hey, wanna see my proprietary certified video clip of Sidney Crosby scoring a goal?”

“No”

“Wanna buy it?”

“I’ll pay you $10 if you go away. How’s that? $15 if it’s forever”
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

BruinsJoe

Registered User
Sep 29, 2020
1,738
1,740
Or

3. Lysell didn't show enough in camp to earn a roster spot, and they like the chemistry of a line of Freddy-Poitras-Geekie enough to not break it up.
think we could be very surprised by Brazeau every time he s on the ice something happen and with whoever he is on the ice with
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeIsAStud

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,428
18,964
Newton, MA.
BRUINS

Projecting the 2024-25 lineup: Could the Bruins opt for a youth movement up front?​

By Conor Ryan Boston.com Staff,Updated July 10, 2024, 1 hour ago

3
David Pastrnak, left, and Pavel Zacha figure to be back on the top line for the Bruins next season.
David Pastrnak, left, and Pavel Zacha figure to be back on the top line for the Bruins next season.CHARLES KRUPA/ASSOCIATED PRESS
There’s more than two months to go before Boston’s training camp opens at Warrior Ice Arena.
But barring any trades, Don Sweeney and his staff likely have just one task left on their summer to-do list.
The Bruins have already allocated a hefty portion of their cap space toward two of the top targets on the free-agent market in Elias Lindholm and Nikita Zadorov — leaving roughly $8.6 million to craft a long-term deal for Jeremy Swayman.
Operating with the assumption that the Bruins and Swayman will reach the finish line on a hefty contract extension (especially with both sides opting to avoid arbitration), the Bruins’ depth chart is likely set for training camp.
RELATED: Bruins plan on giving Joonas Korpisalo a fresh start, but roster spot far from a lock
Boston has addressed some sizable vacancies while adding a lot more physicality, but there are still a few question marks hovering over the team, especially up front.

ADVERTISING

Advertisement



Here’s our first projected depth chart for the 2024-25 Bruins, starting with the forwards.
Get Sports Headlines
The Globe's most recent sports headlines delivered to your inbox every morning.
Enter Email
Sign Up

Pavel Zacha – Elias Lindholm – David Pastrnak​

Lindholm’s arrival gives the Bruins a proven, 200-foot center cut from the similar cloth to Patrice Bergeron.
Even though Lindholm’s offensive production dipped in 2023-24 between Calgary and Vancouver, a full season stapled next to one of the top goal-scorers in the league in David Pastrnak (along with featured reps on the bumper with the top power-play unit) should allow Lindholm to comfortably surpass the 60-point threshold in 2024-25.
“Way back in the [2013] draft, we identified Elias as a player that has a lot of Bergeron qualities,” said Sweeney. “It’s kind of been a two-year pursuit to tell you the truth, wondering maybe down the road if he would ever get to free agency. … He’s only played in a top-line role.
“And now he’s got a chance to go play with Pasta like he might have had with [Johnny] Gaudreau and [Matthew] Tkachuk [in Calgary]. I think the bumper spot on our power play is an area that Elias is going to fit in seamlessly in that regard. And he wins his draws. So you start to realize like there’s a little bit of what we had and what we missed.”
RELATED: Will Bruins’ decision to bolster defense over scoring help backfire?
With Lindholm in place next to Pastrnak, the Bruins also have the luxury of shifting Zacha over to wing, but keeping him on a line next to his fellow countryman in Pastrnak. While Zacha did an admirable job slotting in as a top-six center (59 points in 78 games) last season, the 27-year-old should benefit from playing a more simplified game on the wing — especially if he takes a more shoot-first mentality with Lindholm setting him up.
Advertisement



Zacha and Pastrnak have already logged plenty of shifts together over the previous two seasons, with Lindholm providing the proper defensive fortitude and playmaking acumen to round out what should be a very dangerous trio.

Brad Marchand – Charlie Coyle – Morgan Geekie​


Keeping Marchand and Coyle together in 2024-25 shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, considering the duo logged over 684 minutes of 5-on-5 ice time last season, per Natural Stat Trick.
The 32-year-old Coyle had a strong season as the center on the first line in 2023-24, posting a career-best 60 points while playing in all situations during special-teams play.
He should benefit from getting slotted to the second line, where he will not be tasked with head-to-head matchups against top-line talents like Sasha Barkov and Auston Matthews night in and night out.
Marchand turned 36 in May, but the captain is still an on-ice spark plug and top-six talent. His ability to win puck battles and two-way talents meshes well with a player like Coyle.

The top question mark lies on the right side, with the Bruins now staring at a sizable vacancy in their top-six grouping after Jake DeBrusk signed a seven-year deal with the Canucks in free agency.
The decision to sign Nikita Zadorov over a top-six winger gives the Bruins one of the most formidable D corps in the league. But Boston was a pedestrian offensive club last season (14th in goals per game) that struggled to find twine in the playoffs. They scored two goals or fewer in eight of their last nine postseason games.
Advertisement



The addition of Elias Lindholm helps, but the Bruins still lost some critical scoring depth with DeBrusk (19 goals), Danton Heinen (17 goals), and James van Riemsdyk (11 goals) no longer in the equation.
Based on Sweeney and the rest of his staff’s comments over the last week, the Bruins are likely looking internally at top-six options. And while it might be tempting to roll with a prospect like Fabian Lysell in such a featured role, we have Morgan Geekie being the first man up for top-six reps come September.
One of the many Bruins who exceeded expectations in an elevated role last season, Geekie scored 17 goals and 39 points over 76 games, adding 137 hits while showcasing a knack for finding soft areas of the ice. His steady game should complement a pair of seasoned veterans in Coyle and Marchand.

Trent Frederic – Matt Poitras – Fabian Lysell​

A featured role as Boston’s third center stands as an ideal springboard for Poitras, who is coming off of major shoulder surgery but showcased plenty of potential as a poised, middle-six playmaker during his rookie season.
Slotting him next to a physical, two-way forward like Frederic should benefit Poitras, with the 27-year-old forward establishing a pretty steady track record of elevating players around him over the years thanks to his well-rounded game, knack for winning puck battles, and propensity to hover around Grade-A ice.

Boston could opt to beef up its third line by slotting in rookie Justin Brazeau on the right side (five goals, seven points in 19 games last season), but we’ll tab Lysell as the youngster who earns the spot out of camp.
Advertisement



Lysell has been knocking at the door for NHL reps for roughly a year, with his skating and high-end skill making him an appealing player to slot in next to Poitras.
RELATED: Eight takeaways from last week’s Bruins Development Camp
“Just pin your ears back, train your [butt] off this summer, and come with the intent that there will be an opportunity here,” Sweeney said Monday of the message to Lysell and Boston’s next wave of young talent. “If you’re the best player, then we find a way to get you in the lineup. … Those guys should have clear intentions to come and find an opportunity to beat somebody out, because it’ll be there.”

The onus falls on Lysell to seize that spot on the roster with a strong preseason. But if both Poitras and Lysell make the most of their opportunity, both forwards could conceivably push themselves into the top-six grouping if they hit their stride thanks to their playmaking talent.
Such a result would be a welcome problem for Montgomery and his staff to have, especially if it prompts moving some talented players like Coyle or Geekie further down the depth chart where they can exploit more matchups.

Max Jones – Johnny Beecher – Mark Kastelic​

Sweeney and Cam Neely both stressed the need for Boston to get faster up front this offseason.
While the departure of DeBrusk looms large, the Bruins are set to roll out an intriguing checking unit bolstered by a pair of big-bodied forwards who can close in quick on skaters in Max Jones and Mark Kastelic.
Advertisement



Kastelic, acquired as part of the Linus Ullmark trade, is a big body at 6-foot-3, 210 pounds and racked up 126 hits over 63 games last season.
The right-shot forward has won 56.3 percent of his faceoffs over his three years in the NHL, giving Boston another useful asset on the dot to pair alongside left-shot pivot Johnny Beecher (54.6 faceoff percentage).
Jones projects as a similar fleet-footed, big-bodied skater on the fourth line. The 6-foot-3 winger appeared in 52 games for the Ducks last season, compiling 15 points including five goals and delivering 127 hits.

If the Bruins are looking for an aggressive forechecking unit with a promising offensive ceiling, this trio offers plenty of appeal.


Conor Ryan can be reached at [email protected].
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,824
19,332
Connecticut
Or

3. Lysell didn't show enough in camp to earn a roster spot, and they like the chemistry of a line of Freddy-Poitras-Geekie enough to not break it up.

They'd need to show some insane chemistry in camp for that to happen. That trio has played all of 40 minutes together and they were out-shot, out-scored and out high danger chanced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,566
37,778
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
I stand corrected. 🙂
The issue with Puckpedia is a lot of people find it difficult to navigate with everything that they have. Things like what is a cost in terms of draft picks to move out a salary? Or what is trading down worth at the draft? Things you never saw on Capfreindly.

But once you get use to it, it's a great resource. And they are trying to make it easier
 

BlackFrancis

Athletic Supporter Patch Partner
Dec 14, 2013
6,176
9,860
The issue with Puckpedia is a lot of people find it difficult to navigate with everything that they have. Things like what is a cost in terms of draft picks to move out a salary? Or what is trading down worth at the draft? Things you never saw on Capfreindly.

But once you get use to it, it's a great resource. And they are trying to make it easier
Love the fact they have the player's agent right up at the top. Not even sure another site has the agents listed at all.
 

CellyHard

Registered User
May 27, 2012
1,230
2,230
Massachusetts
Any rumors who will be given PTOs?
No rumors that I know of but I want them to grab a San Jose guy either Barabanov or Zadina. That team was so bad last year I feel like it messed with a lot of guys performances.

We give Peeke an excuse for two years ago leading the league with an awful +/- because he was on a poor CBJ team but with San Jose their goal differential this year was -146 which was just substantially worse than any other team in the league.

I just feel like you cant defend Peeke without at least considering someone on that team since they were even more bad.

Take Duclair for example. His 5v5 Corsi was 41.6% in San Jose (one of the worst on the team) and went up all the way to 50.1% on the Lightning. Massive jump. Went to almost a PPG player.

Barabanov had a 45.5% Corsi 5v5, which was higher than Charlie Coyle...

And his expected even strength goals per 60 minutes was the same as Brad Marchand...

I think there could still be something there considering the two years prior he was basically considered a top six forward whereas Zadina is still much more of a question mark and has basically failed on two teams now.

Barabanov needs a chance out of SJ IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad