wmupreds
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2022
- 925
- 2,221
Yeah I don’t really agree with this. It’s not a perfect analogy- tackling is a different thing than hockey hitting- but the NFL/college football cracked down on targeting and it turns out it’s really difficult to blow people up while avoiding head contact, so you just see way fewer of those types of hits now. Sure it changed the game to some degree, it’s harder to break up passes for example when you can’t just lay a guy out, but the league is still doing just fine. IIHF has way less tolerance for blowing people up and is still a good product IMO.Only way to stop legal hits from causing injuries is to remove hitting. When you have the variances the NHL does in height, weight, and strength someone is always going to get injured.
Frankly I put Carrier's injury on his teammates. They poked the bear, don't complain when he wakes up.
Honestly you could just change the rule from “principal point of contact” to “head contact” like many leagues do and take care of plenty of it. It’s not about getting rid of all injuries, of course that’s never gonna happen. Nor is it about banning all physical play. Just that I don’t think the thrill or whatever of seeing Tom Wilson destroy someone (while still hitting him in the head btw) is really worth potentially maiming people.