shadow1
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2008
- 16,722
- 5,519
Question for those more knowledgeable about hockey positions and strategy than me.
Been listening to a few podcasts/local Denver radio interviews lately and a couple of hockey poo-bahs have stated the the NHL has become "positionless" - at least at the forward position: forwards are forwards and talent is talent and speed is speed and it doesn't matter whether you call them wingers or centers. Find the best, most effective combos you can and throw them out regardless of whether they are true wingers or centers.
Which brings us to the Avs. Its been a fait accompli around here and a mantra that the Avs desperately, feverishly need a 2C. But is that really true? I mean, it would be great to have Kadri 2.0 (or even 3.0) but suppose (hell, let's just accept it) that the asking price for even middling centers at the TDL will invoke a gag reflex among fans and Sakic/Mac. I mean, the object of a TDL deal is to make your team better overall - not the same or worse after you trade the talent. If other GM's won't cough up just OK centers without raiding the Avs pantry, at what point is it just not worth it to give up picks/players just to say "OK, we have our 2C" . . .without making the Avs appreciably better?
Question: Is it better to overpay (maybe way overpay) for a true Center or underpay (or use the same money) for a couple of depth wingers that you can mix and match across 4 lines and to hell with positioning?
Please, no "MacFarland is an incompetent moron and is screwing the team" takes. It's not true and doesn't move the needle. Mac-Sakic have been working the phones for weeks/months trying to address this. I'm just wondering what our true pain threshold is to solve a problem . . . that may not be a problem if it can be overcome by volume. Or involves a solution that doesn't net a better team on the ice
What was it Stalin said: "Quantity has a quality all it's own"? Maybe that the answer. I don't know.
Thoughts?
Centers have more responsibilities than wingers, particularly in the defensive zone. Going with an all-wing line would just exasperate the Avalanche's defensive struggles, and probably be a disaster overall.
With that said, Colorado has never been shy about moving wingers with center experience to the middle of the ice. Colton and Olofsson were wingers last year, and to my knowledge Wagner hadn't played center in at least a few seasons. Helm was moved back to center after many years of playing LW with Detroit. And lest we forget how often Compher, Kerfoot, Jost, and Newhook were bounced back-and-forth between C and W.
That modus operandi has led the club to where they are now: again (eternally?) in need of center help.