Olympics: 2026 U.S. Olympic Team

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Tkachuk Eichel Hughes
Boldy Matthews Tkachuk
Connor Miller Tuch
Guentzel Cooley Larkin

Hughes McAvoy
Slavin Faber
Werenski Fox
Sanderson

Hellebyuck
Oettinger
Swayman
 
Stop. It's at the end of the shift. That is a typical type of pass up the wall to have your forward tip it along into the zone, and for everyone to change.

The forward there is supposed to tip the puck or at least tie it up and make it difficult. Blaming his pass is completely reaching. It was like a B- level pass. It was not a "bad" pass.

Fox was expecting to change (like numerous other players) because he didn't expect Canada to emerge cleanly with the puck into the American zone in warps speed time. Of course he didn't initially have proper body shape to defend that rush. He shouldn't have had to defend it.

Calling him the main culprit is completely insane. He's probably like the fourth most to blame there (Hellebuyck, Nelson, the forward on the boards there, arguably the LW for just vacating the play because it would've allowed Hanifin to take Marner (as opposed to the forward who dragged him wide) and Fox to take Bennett.

You are essentially blaming a guy defending an odd man run for not making a hero play on the puck. Fox played it exactly as he should've. He took the puck carrier, didn't allow him to walk down the middle of the ice and get a shot, and forced Marner to pass it to the wide trailer at a bad angle. What he could've done better is time the hero play well, which is easier said than done
As an outsider into this conversation, this is about the most forgiving review of the play to Fox as you can get.

He reads Miller going to the bench for the tip and misses the pass (when it’s the tournament of the best, you can’t accept a “b-“ pass. Fox mad a bad pass for that moment. He also could have circled back around and flip out if he needed. Miller was lazy too, he should’ve expected the pass and made a better effort, but it wasn’t a hard crisp pass for Miller on the tape.

Fox then is slow to pivot back, although I don’t think that mattered much in the scheme of things.

Nelson is coming from the left to Marner, while Hughes is working from the right. Fox, potentially from his slow pivot, steps to the center to attack Marner while Mitch is coasting in from the blue line. Too much gap is given to Bennett, who walks in and puts it short side. If Fox stays central between Bennett and Marner, Hughes comes in and back checks Marner to attack worst for the US a shot from the top of the circles. Which Helly is squared to.

Fox is the central culprit. His less than stellar pass and slow pivot + his unnecessary pressure to Marner opened the lane for Sam. Match it to Slavins play on the 3 on two when he matched the shooter and shifted to the secondary player only to then “hero play” the shot block, and Fox leaves a lot to be desired.

My opinion of course, but not a pretty play by Adam
 
Obviously, there’s a lot of hockey between now and Milan, but I think McAvoy, Quinn Hughes, Werenski and Slavin are the “core four” defensively for the next 3+ years (you can probably throw Faber in there too if you hate rhyming and want a “core five”).

I think it’s very likely Fox will be there… but I don’t think it’s a lock, and I’m of course even more uncertain that he’ll be a regular in the lineup even if he’s on the roster. Which, if you would’ve said that about Adam Fox in reference to the 2026 Olympics at literally any time from spring 2021 through last week, would’ve sounded absolutely insane.
 
As an outsider into this conversation, this is about the most forgiving review of the play to Fox as you can get.

He reads Miller going to the bench for the tip and misses the pass (when it’s the tournament of the best, you can’t accept a “b-“ pass. Fox mad a bad pass for that moment. He also could have circled back around and flip out if he needed. Miller was lazy too, he should’ve expected the pass and made a better effort, but it wasn’t a hard crisp pass for Miller on the tape.

Fox then is slow to pivot back, although I don’t think that mattered much in the scheme of things.

Nelson is coming from the left to Marner, while Hughes is working from the right. Fox, potentially from his slow pivot, steps to the center to attack Marner while Mitch is coasting in from the blue line. Too much gap is given to Bennett, who walks in and puts it short side. If Fox stays central between Bennett and Marner, Hughes comes in and back checks Marner to attack worst for the US a shot from the top of the circles. Which Helly is squared to.

Fox is the central culprit. His less than stellar pass and slow pivot + his unnecessary pressure to Marner opened the lane for Sam. Match it to Slavins play on the 3 on two when he matched the shooter and shifted to the secondary player only to then “hero play” the shot block, and Fox leaves a lot to be desired.

My opinion of course, but not a pretty play by Adam
We're beating this to death perhaps, but ...

It wasn't a good pass by Fox, but he put it off the boards to hit Miller on his forehand side. The biggest mistake, which led to the entire tying goal sequence, was Miller not chipping the puck cleanly past Bennett right here.

1740202304950.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Herby
Assuming Robertson and Beniers bounce back next season:

Tkachuk-Eichel-Tkachuk
Guentzel-Matthews-Boldy
Hughes-Larkin-Tuch
Knies-Miller-Thompson
Robertson, Beniers

Hughes-McAvoy
Slavin-Faber
Sanderson-Pesce
Hanifin

Hellebuyck
Oettinger
Swayman
 
Assuming Robertson and Beniers bounce back next season:

Tkachuk-Eichel-Tkachuk
Guentzel-Matthews-Boldy
Hughes-Larkin-Tuch
Knies-Miller-Thompson
Robertson, Beniers

Hughes-McAvoy
Slavin-Faber
Sanderson-Pesce
Hanifin

Hellebuyck
Oettinger
Swayman
That bottom six isnt very impressive. Also same with the bottom pairing dmen.

Comparing Canada top 6 its vastly superior to US.

No one in their right mind is taking a Tkachuks over McKinnon and point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peiskos
The discourse around Fox is going to go on all year. As a Rangers fan I just want to add he has not looked himself since his knee injuries. He is not the player who won the Norris right now. That doesn't mean he's not still an elite NHL defensemen. But in a best on best, only 6 spots you need to build out the most well rounded D core you can. If Hughes and Werenski are healthy, I think they fill the offensive QB needs. A slightly diminished Adam Fox might not be what is needed, but rather someone else who might be bigger, faster, or more physically imposing.
 
The discourse around Fox is going to go on all year. As a Rangers fan I just want to add he has not looked himself since his knee injuries. He is not the player who won the Norris right now. That doesn't mean he's not still an elite NHL defensemen. But in a best on best, only 6 spots you need to build out the most well rounded D core you can. If Hughes and Werenski are healthy, I think they fill the offensive QB needs. A slightly diminished Adam Fox might not be what is needed, but rather someone else who might be bigger, faster, or more physically imposing.
They will prbably carry 8 Dmen. Luke Hughes and maybe John Carlson added.
Hanifin probably not there.
 
Last edited:
They will prbably carry 8 Dmen. Luke Hughes and maybe John Carlson added.
Hanifin probably not there.
I do wonder if they go with some younger guys as their extras, to get them some experience in that kind of environment in advance of 2028 and 2030. Maybe 1 vet and 1 young player for each forwards and defensemen. Hughes would be a top candidate for that. Probably Cooley for the forwards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KillerMillerTime
I thought Boldy played a very strong tournament, positionally he was excellent throughout, played with tremendous pace and mixed in aggressive physicality at times. A couple of puck bobbles came into play but he was highly involved in generating US possession and chances against the top competition that was also very defensively sound.

My main takeaway for the roster is that speed is going to remain paramount for success. It was very obvious who the underperforming players were and they pretty much all had the same issue being below the pace. For that reason, I just don’t think it’s likely Robertson makes the team even with a torrid scoring pace. I do think Tuch could get a shot and play a depth role well, but would need to see him at the WCs making an impact and also would want him getting in a lot of PK practice.

I think the forwards were more of an issue than the defensemen when push came to shove, a few guys were just out of their depth with the effort and pace required for this level of competition. JT Miller is a lot closer to a cut than a lock for me based on that, he was far too soft on the puck in the neutral zone. Jack Hughes needs to improve his battling skills between now and the Olympics. Nelson won’t be back, Kreider shouldn’t be either.

Keller won’t make this team based on playstyle and past attitude toward USA hockey. Tage is not a Guerin style player but may get a better shot next year, needs to add more truculence to his game though. Cooley and Beniers are the guys I think could be very interesting adds but may be a few more years away.

Hard to go too wrong on the roster with the core here, team is going to be challenging for gold on paper and should be right in the mix for best we have seen at this level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KillerMillerTime
After watching the Four Nations and knowing who the U.S. management team for the Olympics will be, I find it hard to believe they will change all that much. I think some tweaks in personnel and pairings/lines are in order though. My current 25 man roster:

Goaltenders (x3):

Connor Hellebucyk-starter
Jake Oettinger-backup
Jeremy Swayman

Other possibilities include Demko and Wolf.

Defensemen (x8):

Hughes/Charlie McAvoy
Jaccob Slavin/Brock Faber
Zach Werenski/Jake Sanderson
Adam Fox/Noah Hanifin

Other possibilities include Vlasic, Carlson, and Pesce.

I think with the expanded roster, Fox will make it, but there's no guarantee he will be a regular with Hughes and Werenski in the lineup. I can live without Hanifin and so can see him replaced.

Forwards (x14):

Kyle Connor/Jack Eichel/Matt Boldy
Matthew Tkachuk/Auston Matthews/Jake Guentzel
Brady Tkachuk/Jack Hughes/JT Miller
Tage Thompson/Dylan Larkin/Alex Tuch
Clayton Keller/Logan Cooley

I wish we had a little more playmaking on the winger. Most of our forwards are more of the goal scoring variety (although that didn't manifest itself as much as I would have liked in this tournament. Does Kane get a shot if he's playing at a high-level next year? Will they consider a guy like Keller? Whatever the case, I don't want to see the black hole that was our 4th line at the Four Nations.

Overall, we'll be a gold medal contender, but we need better finishing, and certain guys have to step up. A guy like Matthews can't be content with being a Danault like player and Jack Hughes has to morph into 2nd stage Dean Youngblood.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad