Rumor: - 2026 Trade Rumors and Free Agency: Offseason Edition | Page 163 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: 2026 Trade Rumors and Free Agency: Offseason Edition

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
Really hard to say. The projections Ive seen have him around $4.5M. But given the lack of Dmen he could certainly end up higher.

Cap wages has Shea at $4.4M and Kulak at $4.0M.

I'd take both of them at those numbers, and then I think we'd have just enough space for a 7D at league minimum type deal:



Lehky - Mack - Necas
Landy - Nelson - Hughes/Brindley
Roy - Kadri - L'Heureux
LOC - Svechkov - Kelly
Brindley/Hughes

Toews - Makar
Kulak - Malinski
Shea - Manson
Gagne/Aamodt


Would be a very solid roster for October IMO. That defense would honestly be pretty deep, everyone essentially at a #5D level or higher.


And we wouldn't use any of our draft picks to make that happen, so we'd still have some good ammo to make moves at next year's deadline to fix the edges(Probably would want 1 Top 9F, and maybe a better 6/7D).
Put Brindley with MacK. Force MacK to stop being a perimeter guy and take the puck into scoring areas. Hopefully Necas and Nelson can find their inner not suck during the playoffs. If it exists.

But I like the lineup overall.
 
Or he just doesn’t want to play in Seattle for the next 8 years.

Since Seattle is toward the bottom of the league in who you'd bet to win the Cup any time soon, and there's a pretty good chance he can get that money elsewhere in this market, it kinda makes sense IMO.

Decent bet the next offers will be for similar money from a team with a better chance to win.
 
I think it's been clear the "no tax" status doesn't matter too much for vet players unless you're a good team since about 2000 or so, when the Panthers were having trouble drawing as a bad team.

But what also seems clear is that once players are choosing between contending teams, the "no tax" status matters a lot. Which makes plenty of sense. Why wouldn't it if most everything else is roughly equal?
 
Seattle might as well go the Knies route at this point as Fat Frank mentioned earlier. 7th overall+ for him. He’s only 23 years old, is signed long term, has no trade protection, and is awesome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill Peckerskull

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad