FLYguy3911
Sanheim Lover
- Oct 19, 2006
- 55,061
- 90,741
Nobody other than Sanheim scores double figure goals regularly as a non-PP defensemen. And Bonk cannot hold Sanheim's jock as a prospect.
TSN 1 spotted Briere in Ottawa checking out the talent at the Sweden-Switzerland game.
York had 10 last year.Nobody other than Sanheim scores double figure goals regularly as a non-PP defensemen. And Bonk cannot hold Sanheim's jock as a prospect.
That's a 50% hit rate, which isn't outrageous given where they'll pick.Could be. But it’s also impossible to predict the relative strength of the latter half of the first round of a draft over a year out, so what evidence do I have of a process based in sound logic?
…..what. That would be a very good outcome. Should?! With one late lottery pick?!
That's a 50% hit rate, which isn't outrageous given where they'll pick.
Flahr is doing better than that so far:
York #14, Brink #34, Foerster #23, Tuomaala #46, Cutter #5, Michkov #7, Bonk #22, Luchanko #13.
Only Tuomaala seems a clear miss so far.
Andrae #54, Bjarnson #51, Berglund #51, Gill #59 a bit past their picks.
They could blow this opportunity or hit a HR.
Drafting is funny, remember when Boston had 13-15 and only came away with DeBrusk, then hit on Carlo at #37. TB took TDA two rounds before Point. TDA #19, Masin #35, MacLeod #57, Point #79.
Augustine is buns too.US getting outplayed by this trash Finnish team.
So you set a ridiculous standard and point out how ridiculous it is? Lol.York had 10 last year.
Sanheim's highest at ES is 9, highest total is 9 and 10.
Provorov had 15 ES his 2nd season, then totaled 13 (6 ES) and 9 (8 ES).
"Bumper Bonk" will probably get his chance to score goals, that's a strong suit for him.
Torts likes his D-men to be aggressive in the O-zone, and Bonk is suited to that role.
If Bonk can give us what Justin Braun did at his NHL peak, he'll be a good 3-4 Dman, maybe good enough to play as the responsible top pairing partner, if we ever get a true #1. There is nothing special about him, he's just a solid all around player, not a star, not an offensive dynamo.So you set a ridiculous standard and point out how ridiculous it is? Lol.
York needed 3 empty netters to reach that mark. Provorov did as well. It was pointed out at the time how fluky it was. Provorov never sniffed that total again. Both guys were PP regulars that year. Most importantly, both guys are more skilled than Bonk.
Bonk went 57 games without a single goal in the OHL prior to getting moved to the bumper spot on the PP. And that's playing on a powerhouse team. Why? Because he can't create his own shot. He's an average at best skater, likely a tick below average. Average skill level. Again probably a tick below in the NHL. He's not an explosive athlete? Where are these consistent 10 goals seasons coming from?
Don't matter how aggressive you are if you don't have the tools and instincts. Drysalde has exactly 1 ES goal in this supposed friendly system and he has a hell of a lot more physical gifts.
I'm not naive enough to think Bonk won't get PP time in some form or fashion, we're getting the Risto experience currently since they are at the throw shit against the wall stage, but blind projections based on box score stats hold no weight. He can't even match the pace he set last year and London might be even better than they were last year.
Bonk is probably going to be a bigger, faster version of Braun with more shooting skills.
Braun was dependable but limited, and didn't become a regular starter until he was 26, at best was a 4th D-man, that would be more my ceiling [the 5% best outcome] for Grans. Hopefully, Bonk ends up better than that. Being a "bigger, more skilled version of Braun" is not an unreasonable expectation.@JojoTheWhale — he’s doing it again!
Remind me of who overrates prospects here. So, you’re saying Bonk will be Slavin. Gotcha. I’ll take the under.
Braun was dependable but limited, and didn't become a regular starter until he was 26, at best was a 4th D-man,
He didn't play the PP, so it was ES and PK for him. But even in his prime he was 2nd/3rd on San Jose, Burns the lead dog, Vlasic, Braun, then a rotating cast behind them. Better than I thought, probably b/c the Philly version was solid but limited to a smaller role.I don’t think we remember prime Braun all that well. It’s understandable given how long he held on and his archetype, but I would strongly disagree with the idea that he topped out at a 4. He hit a wall hard around 31. Before that, he was a damn fine Defeneseman. Depending on the prime year you sampled, you could easily argue he gave low end first pair impacts.