2025 WJC Discussion

hawksfan50

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
14,654
2,155
So are the Hawks going to draft the Latvian goalie.?..they have put up a wall goalie before on the history of this tournament when playing Canada...thebokd Elvis is in the building routine and he wins the shoot-out goalieduel ...He isx18 undraftddandvplays for Sherbrooke in the QMJHL ...6'2 goalie..
 

Hattrick Kane

Registered User
Oct 8, 2018
10,138
15,145
I think Bonk sucks so that’s not surprising. Was he just not getting chances? They had 55 shots I’d have to assume he had plenty of chances
Catton took some really lazy penalties in this game. Just not moving his feet like he should be.

I haven’t watched much of Cowan, but holy hell his game will not translate to the NHL. He literally does not pass the puck. He just skates around passing off golden opportunities.
 

Hattrick Kane

Registered User
Oct 8, 2018
10,138
15,145
Also, Nick Lardis absolutely could have been on this team. That’s a guy who loves to shoot and score goals. I’m looking more carefully, and he’s having a way better season than a lot of the plugs they chose.
 

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,944
14,051
Strongly disagree with this. If you can get a strong 3rd line contributor at 19 that's a huge win. I'm sure the Hawks were hoping for a 2nd line C, but would be thrilled with a good 3rd line C.
Right. A productive NHLer is already a huge success of a draft pick.

Player comps and draft potential is a stupid thought process IMHO. These kids are all such wildcards you can’t extrapolate that out. It just lays the ground for disappointment. Especially comparing these kids to very good NHLers
 

CanadianHawks

Registered User
Feb 23, 2018
1,718
1,520
Catton took some really lazy penalties in this game. Just not moving his feet like he should be.

I haven’t watched much of Cowan, but holy hell his game will not translate to the NHL. He literally does not pass the puck. He just skates around passing off golden opportunities.

Cowan had a brutal turnover when we were up 2-0 against the Finns and I was scratching my head why he didn’t dump it in on the line change. Even the announcers called him on it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hattrick Kane

Hattrick Kane

Registered User
Oct 8, 2018
10,138
15,145
Cowan had a brutal turnover when we were up 2-0 against the Finns and I was scratching my head why he didn’t dump it in on the line change. Even the announcers called him on it
They’ve been hyping up this point streak he apparently has in the OHL. But his numbers are honestly not that impressive. Certainly nothing that screams superstar. And he turns the puck over way too much to be a defensively responsible middle sixer.
 

CanadianHawks

Registered User
Feb 23, 2018
1,718
1,520
They’ve been hyping up this point streak he apparently has in the OHL. But his numbers are honestly not that impressive. Certainly nothing that screams superstar. And he turns the puck over way too much to be a defensively responsible middle sixer.

He reminds me of another former London Knight, Max Domi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hattrick Kane

Styles

No Light, No Signal
Apr 6, 2017
8,414
13,630
Strongly disagree with this. If you can get a strong 3rd line contributor at 19 that's a huge win. I'm sure the Hawks were hoping for a 2nd line C, but would be thrilled with a good 3rd line C.

That is not a huge win at all. I can find a decent 3rd line center in every free agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clownish

MTU34

Registered User
Oct 6, 2020
1,383
2,588
That is not a huge win at all. I can find a decent 3rd line center in every free agency.
*You can find a decent third line center to severely overpay

Give me the cost controlled guy you have in his prime over the 32 year old that you gave a huge contract to play in your bottom 6. Go look at how a vast majority of drafts play out. Walking away with a high end 3C with a mid/late first is objectively a successful pick
 

Styles

No Light, No Signal
Apr 6, 2017
8,414
13,630
*You can find a decent third line center to severely overpay

Give me the cost controlled guy you have in his prime over the 32 year old that you gave a huge contract to play in your bottom 6. Go look at how a vast majority of drafts play out. Walking away with a high end 3C with a mid/late first is objectively a successful pick

Doesn’t take much to please you people. There is a relentless forechecking forward out there putting up 16 goals and 39 points for this pick. But hey that’s not allowed because we WoUlDnT hAvE gOt BeDaRd!
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
32,094
21,471
Kind of a stupid play by Schaefer to get himself hurt. Hopefully nothing too serious but kid needs to play smarter out there than that.
 

MTU34

Registered User
Oct 6, 2020
1,383
2,588
Doesn’t take much to please you people. There is a relentless forechecking forward out there putting up 16 goals and 39 points for this pick. But hey that’s not allowed because we WoUlDnT hAvE gOt BeDaRd!
Well that’s certainly a coherent and good faith argument. We’re not debating whether or not it would’ve been better to keep Hagel. We’re debating whether or not Moore turning into a Dave Bolland makes this pick a success.

Isolating Moore as the return for Hagel is also just objectively bad faith arguing. Pretty easy to convince yourself that you’re right if you ignore the fact that there’s a second first rounder in the deal huh?

And trading Hagel had absolutely nothing to do with “getting Bedard”. When that deal was made Hagel was a very good complimentary player riding a ridiculous shooting bender. No one in their right mind saw a guy that’d end up being good enough to play for Canada at a best on best there. Either way, now that he’s turned into that player, had you not dealt him you’d be faced with the reality of paying a winger 6.5 million dollars a year only to win nothing because you were rebuilding for his entire prime.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad