Gecklund
Registered User
I mean I don’t blame him for not wanting to Google tush push with no context.Google is your friend
I mean I don’t blame him for not wanting to Google tush push with no context.Google is your friend
Totally safe for workI mean I don’t blame him for not wanting to Google tush push with no context.
am i going to regret asking what "Tush Push" is
I think its funny they tried to "rename" it the Brotherly Shove, but that did not stick whatsoeverI mean I don’t blame him for not wanting to Google tush push with no context.
TFC got some business done this week as well, they also confirmed Insigne will be staying put for this season.
You just can’t amortize a transfer fee over a longer deal, but in the case of an extension that’s not an issue.Quite aside from the general wtf, didn't Chelsea force them to get rid of deals like that? or did they just disincentivise them from an accounting pov?
Also one big thing this gives a hint at is the charges against City and at least an assumed cap on the punishments.
Haaland isn’t signing a long term deal to be relegated or even just be a mid table squad, so you have to figure it at least means City internally don’t think the resolution will have much impact on their operations.
Only accounting POV toward FFP and PSR.Quite aside from the general wtf, didn't Chelsea force them to get rid of deals like that? or did they just disincentivise them from an accounting pov?
And being able to sell him for a huge amount in case of relegation.Or theyre trying to lock down a big star to keep him from running in the event of serious punishment?
It's not that IMO.Most rumors say he’s around 500k/week wages as a base and with bonuses might climb near 700k/week.
You just can’t amortize a transfer fee over a longer deal, but in the case of an extension that’s not an issue.
Right PSR/FFP aren’t the same as tax accounting. But frankly tax accounting is pretty irrelevant to anyone but the government. It doesn’t practically impact what they’re doing in terms of footballing business.It's not that IMO.
The amortization of the transfer fee in the FFP & PSR compliance can only be amortized for 5 years. They therefore prevent the long contract loop hole. Nothing to do with extensions and in their official financial book (not to do with FFP/PSR) they can still amortize it over whatever number of year they want (based on the contract length), for taxes purposes.