GDT: 2025 Trade Deadline | Y’all Got Anymore of Them Trades?

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.

How many more trades will the Avs make?

  • 0

    Votes: 5 5.7%
  • 1

    Votes: 26 29.9%
  • 2

    Votes: 48 55.2%
  • 3

    Votes: 5 5.7%
  • 4+

    Votes: 3 3.4%

  • Total voters
    87


There’s a prevailing industry belief that teams were preparing to offer Rantanen a free-agent deal that would match the $14 million AAV on Leon Draisaitl’s new contract in Edmonton this summer, and it’s only logical to conclude that something similar could be out there for Marner in a rising-cap environment.

A key difference in those contracts was Marner securing a full no-movement clause when eligible in Years 5 and 6, while Rantanen accepted a nine-team no-trade list.

That put them in vastly different positions in their platform season, with Rantanen getting blindsided by a Jan. 24 trade to Carolina when the Avalanche didn’t like the direction contract talks were going. That was followed by an awkward six-week period where he was a reluctant member of the Hurricanes before Rantanen signed his life-changing third NHL deal in Dallas.

Marner, meanwhile, could sleep easy all year long while knowing that he didn’t have to negotiate at all.

Good point by Johnston that I haven't thought of enough. Mikko could've derailed the whole thing with a full NTC but that's the one thing he didn't get during those tough negotiations last time.

And yeah, Leafs are in trouble this summer.
 
I wonder what everyone here would say if CMac traded away Rantanen and Mittelstadt this year, and ended up with Stankhoven and a bunch of picks?
I mean it's not really the same though. Necas wasn't coming back to CAR after his contract. Necas and the FO and coach did not get along well in Carolina. Their relationship was ending. Carolina taking a shot at getting an elite player 1) in return for Necas and 2) to give them that extra boost to win a cup makes plenty of sense. It was a risk for sure and it didn't pan out, but for a team trying to get over the hump some risks would need to be made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS
Necas @ 6.125 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rantanen @ 12+. Knowing the cap situation next year, no brainer. Rantanen on this team would have had Malinski playing top 4 minutes and Ivan top 6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS
I mean it's not really the same though. Necas wasn't coming back to CAR after his contract. Necas and the FO and coach did not get along well in Carolina. Their relationship was ending. Carolina taking a shot at getting an elite player 1) in return for Necas and 2) to give them that extra boost to win a cup makes plenty of sense. It was a risk for sure and it didn't pan out, but for a team trying to get over the hump some risks would need to be made.

I have absolute respect for the shot Carolina took.

They even almost had Marner.

Sometimes you swing and miss.
 
I have absolute respect for the shot Carolina took.

They even almost had Marner.

Sometimes you swing and miss.
And in the end they traded Necas and Drury a 2nd and a 4th for Stankoven, 1st, 1st, 3rd, 3rd.

Obviously not ideal for a contender. But in a vacuum value wise it's really not bad. And we already knew that their team pre trade wasn't going to win a cup. Getting the chance to add a legit game breaker made all the sense in the world for them.
 
Really impressive work by C-Mac. Sure, it cost a lot and we can get into why they were in those predicaments to begin with he navigated it well.

My only real complaints would be that last 6D spot and dumb and dumber still being on the team.
Imagine that a bit over a year ago we called him CNap lol
 
Imagine that a bit over a year ago we called him CNap lol
Screen_Shot_2020-10-05_at_11.51.58_AM.png
 
And in the end they traded Necas and Drury a 2nd and a 4th for Stankoven, 1st, 1st, 3rd, 3rd.

Obviously not ideal for a contender. But in a vacuum value wise it's really not bad. And we already knew that their team pre trade wasn't going to win a cup. Getting the chance to add a legit game breaker made all the sense in the world for them.
Contention years are precious. You can not waste them. Their work this year is on par with the Avs landing Eller at the deadline. Aho and Slavin are elite players in their prime. I can appreciate their aggressiveness trying to go all in twice, but they have failed twice with it.
 
Contention years are precious. You can not waste them. Their work this year is on par with the Avs landing Eller at the deadline. Aho and Slavin are elite players in their prime. I can appreciate their aggressiveness trying to go all in twice, but they have failed twice with it.
They might need to use a page from Tampa, and use those picks on someone with term already
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS
Contention years are precious. You can not waste them. Their work this year is on par with the Avs landing Eller at the deadline. Aho and Slavin are elite players in their prime. I can appreciate their aggressiveness trying to go all in twice, but they have failed twice with it.
Not even close to similar imo. I'd rather miss out on a contention year swinging and missing on an elite player than betting it on Lars f***ing Eller.
 
So how much money do we have to re-up Nelson next year? Assuming we keep Drouin and Lindgren at 4M AAV each and Landy isn't on the payroll. @Richard88 ?
 

Ad

Ad