Blue Jays Discussion: 2024 Season (better title pending)

aingefan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
5,058
2,830
Of note regarding the Pearson trade….he wasn’t expiring, had team control.


Maybe it’s just a roll of the dice, or maybe it signals that more guys are on the table than originally expected.

A bit odd to sell a controllable arm - especially a power one - since the cupboards aren’t exactly full.

Wonder who’s next.

The tank might be real.

Edit to add: Pinango is a major league name at least. Plus, why is Rivera in AA?

Just drafted last year.
 
Last edited:

metafour

Registered User
Apr 6, 2008
1,833
688
Pearson is 27 and has been worth -0,2 fwar in His career. What do you expect?

- Basically 28 years old
- Almost out of options
- Zero MLB success
- Reliever who gives up tons of HR's and doesn't strand baserunners
- Has displayed zero command on the mound

"wHy tRadE hIm foR aNoTher 4Th OuTfiElDEr??"
 
  • Like
Reactions: canucksfan

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,073
43,295
Junktown
Dear god, nobody is giving you a top prospect for Nate Pearson or half a season of Yimi Garcia who just came back from the IL with an elbow injury.

Top prospects are only traded for star players.

People REALLY need to adjust their expectations for what kind of returns the Blue Jays players will get. You only get incredible returns for star-level players.
 

Brock Boeser Laser Show

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
5,925
5,362
Nate pearson is worth a bag of baseballs. The return is what you would expect for a guy that serves taters.

Pearson has one of the flattest fastballs I've ever seen. Hitters at this level aren't going to miss high 90s fastball with no movement.

You would pretty much have to completely overhaul his mechanics and arm slot if you want to get some movement on his fastball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs10Habs and MS

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,142
1,840
- Basically 28 years old
- Almost out of options
- Zero MLB success
- Reliever who gives up tons of HR's and doesn't strand baserunners
- Has displayed zero command on the mound

"wHy tRadE hIm foR aNoTher 4Th OuTfiElDEr??"
But Pete Walker is the best pitching coach in baseball...

There's a reason why you don't trade Pearsons. They got a potential 4th OF and a potential backup IF (both of which can be claimed on waivers most springs).

Watch him return to an .850 ops catcher immediately, re-sign, and burn us for the next 5 seasons lol

Honestly nice to see Jansen get a shot at the playoffs again though.
Watch the Jays get another all D no bat prospect or a reliever prospect
 

Cloned

Begging for Bega
Aug 25, 2003
80,563
69,410
But Pete Walker is the best pitching coach in baseball...

There's a reason why you don't trade Pearsons. They got a potential 4th OF and a potential backup IF (both of which can be claimed on waivers most springs).


Watch the Jays get another all D no bat prospect or a reliever prospect
Remember when we thought AA had a fetish for toolsy athletes who couldn’t actually hit?

Turns out that was just a minor kink compared to Atkins.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kurtz

Woodman19

Registered User
Jun 14, 2008
18,545
1,981
Remember when we thought AA had a fetish for toolsy athletes who couldn’t actually hit?

Turns out that was just a minor kink compared to Atkins.
To be fair there is a difference between going for all athletic players out of highschool vs. ones who are in full season MiLB ball. But still, gut this front office. What have they done to show they know what they are even acquiring? Only things they hit on were with AA's scouting staff.
 

metafour

Registered User
Apr 6, 2008
1,833
688
There's a reason why you don't trade Pearsons. They got a potential 4th OF and a potential backup IF (both of which can be claimed on waivers most springs).

What is the reason? I'd love to hear this.

They have likely tried everything they can with him. He is almost out of options which means he pretty much has to stay on your MLB roster. Except he pitches like a potato, so he really shouldn't be on the roster at all.

So your brilliant idea is to what? Have him continue to get shelled at the MLB level in the off-chance that he magically learns how to pitch next season?

The "point" here is that if you keep him you are running a legitimate risk of DFA'ing him next season and getting nothing. This is a player that needs a fresh start somewhere else - he isn't figuring anything out here. He likely won't figure anything out with the Cubs either.

I'm dying here. Oh you can just claim backup OF's and IF's off waivers? Do you think there is a shortage of hard-throwing crap relievers or something? You realize they can do the same thing and easily land some other team's "Nate Pearson", right? A 28 year old pitcher with a negative career WAR LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wry n Ginger and MS

Woodman19

Registered User
Jun 14, 2008
18,545
1,981
What is the reason? I'd love to hear this.

They have likely tried everything they can with him. He is almost out of options which means he pretty much has to stay on your MLB roster. Except he pitches like a potato, so he really shouldn't be on the roster at all.

So your brilliant idea is to what? Have him continue to get shelled at the MLB level in the off-chance that he magically learns how to pitch next season?

The "point" here is that if you keep him you are running a legitimate risk of DFA'ing him next season and getting nothing. This is a player that needs a fresh start somewhere else - he isn't figuring anything out here. He likely won't figure anything out with the Cubs either.
Yeah I got no issues with it, better to clear the roster spot and add some lottery tickets at this point. We need a reset here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: canucksfan

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,142
1,840
What is the reason? I'd love to hear this.

They have likely tried everything they can with him. He is almost out of options which means he pretty much has to stay on your MLB roster. Except he pitches like a potato, so he really shouldn't be on the roster at all.

So your brilliant idea is to what? Have him continue to get shelled at the MLB level in the off-chance that he magically learns how to pitch next season?

The "point" here is that if you keep him you are running a legitimate risk of DFA'ing him next season and getting nothing. This is a player that needs a fresh start somewhere else - he isn't figuring anything out here. He likely won't figure anything out with the Cubs either.

I'm dying here. Oh you can just claim backup OF's and IF's off waivers? Do you think there is a shortage of hard-throwing crap relievers or something? You realize they can do the same thing and easily land some other team's "Nate Pearson", right? A 28 year old pitcher with a negative career WAR LOL.
He's minor league eligible meaning that he could have been AAA depth and a better callup than what they now have.

He's a better Trent Thornton whom the Jays kept until they couldn't.

It's not like the farm is missing these pieces. There is at least 1 of each at every single level.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad