Yep.If I've learned one thing about being online, it's that it's only a matter of time before the porn bots find you.
They're on Facebook. They're on YouTube.
They're everywhere
Yep.If I've learned one thing about being online, it's that it's only a matter of time before the porn bots find you.
They're on hfboards, and their name is @dabidYep.
They're on Facebook. They're on YouTube.
They're everywhere
Right?Don't give me hope
Soto being only 26 next year is probably a factor in them being willing to splurge on him. You’d essentially be purchasing the entire prime of a generational talent. You almost never have the opportunity to do that in free agency. He’s a once in a lifetime free agent.Right?
I said it a few pages back. Maybe, just maybe he gets into Henry's moneyball head and checks all the boxes.
Agreed, plus a best ever OBP which will help as he ages.Soto being only 26 next year is probably a factor in them being willing to splurge on him. You’d essentially be purchasing the entire prime of a generational talent. You almost never have the opportunity to do that in free agency. He’s a once in a lifetime free agent.
It’s not like buying into him when he’s 30 or even 28. Getting him at 26 makes a big difference on a 12+ year deal
What if I told you the Red Sox could have one of these two options... which would you choose and why?
A. Juan Soto at 14-years, $630 million for an AAV of $45 million/year.
B. One of the premier starters on the market (Burns, Fried, Snell) AND one of the premier closers on the market (Helsley, Williams, Scott) for a combined AAV of $45 million/year.
Also, there's this...
Counterpoint: The Red Sox outfield was pretty good last year. Their rotation was OK. The bullpen was bad. The Sox will see a greater immediate impact if they spend their money fixing holes in their roster than they will trying to improve on a strength.Def Juan because generational talent
Can’t really go wrong with either option imo i just would prefer the megastar and would deal from the outfield depth to get pitchingCounterpoint: The Red Sox outfield was pretty good last year. Their rotation was OK. The bullpen was bad. The Sox will see a greater immediate impact if they spend their money fixing holes in their roster than they will trying to improve on a strength.
What if they get Soto, trade for Crochet, and make a run at Sasaki? The latter two won't make a lot and still leaves the ability to sign a closer. Hopefully Fulmer and Liam Hendricks can contribute as well.Counterpoint: The Red Sox outfield was pretty good last year. Their rotation was OK. The bullpen was bad. The Sox will see a greater immediate impact if they spend their money fixing holes in their roster than they will trying to improve on a strength.
What if I told you the Red Sox could have one of these two options... which would you choose and why?
A. Juan Soto at 14-years, $630 million for an AAV of $45 million/year.
B. One of the premier starters on the market (Burns, Fried, Snell) AND one of the premier closers on the market (Helsley, Williams, Scott) for a combined AAV of $45 million/year.
Also, there's this...
Soto all day everyday. He makes the lineup way better by slotting everyone correctly. You can also use that signing to deal away someone like Abreyu for a starter and, you've actually improved.
I think the play is sign Soto, deal Abreyu ++ for Crochet, sign a mid tier starter, and fill out bullpen.
Ideally deal Yoshida as well, but you're taking a bad contract or eating money there, so who knows
I am not attaching Anthony with essentially a salary dump. He's basically untouchable despite having a log jam in the OF.But, if you have Soto -- you can package Yoshida with Anthony for a better return, because Soto, Rafaella, Duran could be your outfield for the next 7-8 years.
Really?I am not attaching Anthony with essentially a salary dump. He's basically untouchable despite having a log jam in the OF.
I am in no way shape or form trading him for pitching either