Another guy I wouldnt signing near league minimum on a one year deal.
He'd cost our remaining cap space I'd imagine
Side note, if we have extra cap space, we should use it to buy free agent years from Moser
Another guy I wouldnt signing near league minimum on a one year deal.
Ironically I just downed a turkey spinach wrap. Which is why I have Pub Subs on the brain (literally and figuratively)Yea I was counting Sheary's teams as years by accident. It's more like 7...you're right. But that's still a lifetime ago.
Never said you implied Guentzel would spark Cirelli. I just can't imagine a scenario where we acquired Guentzel for any other reason than to be a foundation on the 1st line, especially for that money...whether that's to get the 2nd line going....to try and get chemistry back with Sheary....whatever. It's just grasping at straws IMO. Didn't mean any offense. I just think it's way simpler than people are making it out to be. He's a stud. He's gonna be a 1st liner.
Don't even Pub subs as much as I want to, so don't really have a fave, but I ate a chipotle chicken one the other day that was great. You?
I think he wound be around 4 million, but for some reason I thought he was still with EDM.He'd cost our remaining cap space I'd imagine
Side note, if we have extra cap space, we should use it to buy free agent years from Moser
So are we circling back to Sprong, JVR, TyJo?
21 goals, 21 assists at ESStamkos didn't produce much 5 on 5 so I don't think he will slow Hagel or Cirelli much. The powerplay may have a drop off overall if we dont find another top 6 forward.
I think Stamkos is the bottom one.21 goals, 21 assists at ES
24 goals, 42 assists at ES
15 goals, 21 assists at ES
Who is who?
We could go back to the 2022-2023 season and it gets funnier.
He's the top. Hagel is the baller in the middle, Cirelli at the bottom.I think Stamkos is the bottom one.
They are in cap hell so they might? lolWe could always trade for Ross Colton back, and give the Avs Sherry lmao
They are in cap hell so they might? lol
Now hes shitting on our prospects... or lack thereof
This quote pisses me off
Maybe the best argument for Sprong is to fill Stammer's spot on the PP.
We talk about what Stammer was getting bad at, not what he was good at, and it was firing clap bombs on the PP.
The way the PP worked pretty much requires a right-handed shooter.
AFP has him with 4m x 3y
There are limited options on the free agent market, and we don't really have a right-handed shooter.The big problem with Sprong is that he's a defensive blackhole, very passive in the defensive end and coasts instead of hustling to recover the puck.
This means the team that gets him, has to shelter him and give him very limited minutes.
Reason why, despite his very talented scoring ability, he's been on 5 different teams in the past 6 years. Teams don't take you seriously anymore if you seem to completely disregard the defensive side of the game.
This is why I don't see him as a great fit anymore, for us.
Could Sprong play a 3rd line role?Sprong would be nice, especially for the PP. Although he's pretty poor defensively and is forced to be shifted down the lineup because he's bad 5v5 defensively.