If Demidov is still on the board, and we move back from 5…it better be for a massive overpay…
Really?!? My memory could be foggy but wasn’t Gorton fighting hard for him?
David be like : water is wet
Maybe you don't remember but this is the NHL lineup the Habs had last yearUse where? Did you find a taker for Gallagher and Anderson? Cause with Gallagher, Anderson, Roy, Dvorak and cie i see no place for depth before another 2 years at least.
We covered that shit already: water is not wetDavid be like : water is wet
I do remember comments about ultra-talented high potential players with more risk. It did sound like they liked the player but were scared of the risk.I remember he asked a question about the team not willing to take the "risk", which I assume meant Michkov. I also find Gorton tends to have a contrarian approach during these meetings to make his team think, but I really don't remember anyone fighting hard for anyone but Reinbacher and that scout for the goalie.
According to some TVA guy in Vegas, the top 5 will stay intact but Habs might looking to take their 5+21 to move up again
wet!!!!!We covered that shit already: water is not wet
It seems clear the sweet spot this draft is having two picks in the 8-12 range than having a top 5 (excluding number 1) and early 20.
In that scenario who are we getting ? Demidov ? I would have a hard time getting the 50/50 toss up of Chicago picking Demidov or not for the assets we'd give.Anaheim - Montreal just seem like natural partners considering the Ducks would likely get their player whether at 3 or 5.
We covered that shit already: water is not wet
Marek called that on 32 thoughts podcast earlier.1-Celebrini
2-Levshunov
3-Buium
4-Lidstrom
5-Demidov
That's how it's gonna go down
Calgary has what that would be intriguing enough ?
Not here.Texier for a fourth ? Were missing the bus again. He'd be exactly the type of depth we could use.
I do remember comments about ultra-talented high potential players with more risk. It did sound like they liked the player but were scared of the risk.
And they were pretty much wrong about that said risk but were not here for that.
Oh like just playing devil’s advocate. Maybe. Yeah I could be wrong. I thought Hughes was being more level headed contrarian while Gorton seemed to think passing on MM was a real mistake.I remember he asked a question about the team not willing to take the "risk", which I assume meant Michkov. I also find Gorton tends to have a contrarian approach during these meetings to make his team think, but I really don't remember anyone fighting hard for anyone but Reinbacher and that scout for the goalie.
In that scenario who are we getting ? Demidov ? I would have a hard time getting the 50/50 toss up of Chicago picking Demidov or not for the assets we'd give.
Much rather sit back relax and pick Iggy/Catton/Lindstrom at 5, or even drop lower.
Lmao what are they adding to Askarov to get top 5 he's good but that's just stupid of them
The funny thing for me is Hughes makes his move.David be like : water is wet