Why would you want to trade an unprotected 1st from a team that is in major cap trouble?Win the lottery, trade the Vegas+PIT picks to move up and take Buium, prosper
If things go right next season we could potentially have 2 top 5 picks.
Why would you want to trade an unprotected 1st from a team that is in major cap trouble?Win the lottery, trade the Vegas+PIT picks to move up and take Buium, prosper
Do you actually think Vegas falls off that much next season? I just don’t see it.Why would you want to trade an unprotected 1st from a team that is in major cap trouble?
If things go right next season we could potentially have 2 top 5 picks.
I think it will actually be cheaper to move up (our second round pick), unless we really are trying to move into the top 5. That said, I would bet the farm that Vegas is a playoff team next yearWhy would you want to trade an unprotected 1st from a team that is in major cap trouble?
If things go right next season we could potentially have 2 top 5 picks.
I think it just depends on how much conviction the scouting staff has on any of the players. If they have conviction on Zeev and think they can trade down and still get him, then great. If instead they have conviction on Demidov, Lev, Silayev, or Dickinson, then even if it's a noisy tier below Celebrini, you pick the player you want to build your team around.Chicago owns Tampa's #1, currently at #20. What if we get #2 pick post lottery and Chicago is at #3 or #4 and offers us their pick + Tampa's to move up?
That way we get: #4, around #14, around #20:
#4 Zeev (he should still be available at #4, we don't need #2 to draft him)
~#14 Iginla or Helenius or whatever D slips
#20 anyone else slipping
Do you actually think Vegas falls off that much next season? I just don’t see it.
Yes i do see them fall off a cliff, they need to find close to 10 million in cap space just to build a full roster. And that was with Stone in LTIR which he will be coming off soon. Going to be close to 20 if he stays on the roster to start the season.Do you actually think Vegas falls off that much next season? I just don’t see it.
There’s an interesting group of D that’ll go in the 20-45 range and I’d probably target two of them: Jiricek, Elick, Emery, Badinka, Brunicke, Kiviharju, Hutson, Danford, Freij, Pulkkinen, Mews, etc.Who are people targeting with our 2 seconds?
There’s an interesting group of D that’ll go in the 20-45 range and I’d probably target two of them: Jiricek, Elick, Emery, Badinka, Brunicke, Kiviharju, Hutson, Danford, Freij, Pulkkinen, Mews, etc.
There’s also some good energy forwards in that area that would be alright picks.
Do you know much about Galvas? Seems like there's an argument that he's been better than Jiricek at the Czech men's level but he's pretty small.There’s an interesting group of D that’ll go in the 20-45 range and I’d probably target two of them: Jiricek, Elick, Emery, Badinka, Brunicke, Kiviharju, Hutson, Danford, Freij, Pulkkinen, Mews, etc.
There’s also some good energy forwards in that area that would be alright picks.
Depends who is available. I think they’re’ll be better options at 33, but at 43 I think he’s worth the risk. It seems like he might be healthy enough to play U18, so I’ll be super interested how he does if so. It will impact his draft rankings quite a bit I imagine.Kiviharju is interesting to me because if he recovers okay from his injury, he could be a big get (a Musty-like “can’t believe he dropped” situation). On the other hand, knee injuries freak me out.
If he drops to one of our 2nds though, feels like a no brainer.
Feels like another Havelid type to me. I almost included him in that list because he’s not that far off of the Kiviharju/Mews/Hutson group. Wouldn’t be my preference at 43 I don’t think. If I’m remembering correctly, I want to say I liked him at last year’s U18 a little.Do you know much about Galvas? Seems like there's an argument that he's been better than Jiricek at the Czech men's level but he's pretty small.
Boo 'em for BuiumBtw the name of this thread is kind questionable. There are so many things that rhyme with ‘Zeev’. Could have done ‘Play Like a Sieve So We Can Draft Zeev’ or ‘Risk That The Sharks Leave, End Up With Zeev’ or ‘Winning’s My Peeve, Give Me Zeev’ or anything else.
Done! To honor you as a key contributor to the draft threads over the years!Depends who is available. I think they’re’ll be better options at 33, but at 43 I think he’s worth the risk. It seems like he might be healthy enough to play U18, so I’ll be super interested how he does if so. It will impact his draft rankings quite a bit I imagine.
Feels like another Havelid type to me. I almost included him in that list because he’s not that far off of the Kiviharju/Mews/Hutson group. Wouldn’t be my preference at 43 I don’t think. If I’m remembering correctly, I want to say I liked him at last year’s U18 a little.
My ideal first two rounds would be something like (1) Celebrini, (12) Yakemchuk/Parekh/Silayev, (33) Elick, (43) Kiviharju.
I’ve wondered lately if Sam Dickinson could possibly fall out of the top-10. Other than size and skating he doesn’t really stand out all that much even at the junior level. Really depends on how risk-adverse the GMs in the top-10 are, as I think he’s got the lowest upside of the consensus top-6 D. That said I’d obviously sprint to the stage if he were there at the Pens pick.
Btw the name of this thread is kind questionable. There are so many things that rhyme with ‘Zeev’. Could have done ‘Play Like a Sieve So We Can Draft Zeev’ or ‘Risk That The Sharks Leave, End Up With Zeev’ or ‘Winning’s My Peeve, Give Me Zeev’ or anything else.
GMMG: "We're like a family here. Any player that joins the Sharks, we view it as their entire family, including their father, also joins as part of a package deal. That's all I have to say about this. Moving forward, I'll only answer questions about how excited we are about being able to draft Dean Letourneau at #1."Ok so I fully expect us to explode if we pick 1OA and pick Celebrini and say Grier picked the wrong guy.
Let’s make HF go bonkers
Time to bring in a body language expert to gauge the varying size of each fabrication.
It’s not hard to lottery protect the traded pick. Make it top 5 or 10 protected. Then it would have to be Sharks unprotected in 26 but that would mean 2 top 5 or 10 picks for the Sharks next year.Why would you want to trade an unprotected 1st from a team that is in major cap trouble?
If things go right next season we could potentially have 2 top 5 picks.
The Vegas pick is an unprotected 1st in 2025. There is absolutely zero chance i trade that until next season is over, makes absolutely zero sense to trade a pick that could still end up being a 1st overall or also could be 32nd also.It’s not hard to lottery protect the traded pick. Make it top 5 or 10 protected. Then it would have to be Sharks unprotected in 26 but that would mean 2 top 5 or 10 picks for the Sharks next year.
AI these days is getting pretty good. If what Rick was saying wasn't so unbelievable I might have believed this was real.
Wait a second. "Sieve" is pronounced "siv" but Zeev is, well, zeeeev, right?Done! To honor you as a key contributor to the draft threads over the years!